Suppr超能文献

双相情感障碍和重度抑郁症的诊断:在三级精神卫生保健机构的一组情绪障碍患者样本中,MINI与临床访谈相比的适用性。

Diagnosis of bipolar and major depressive disorders: The appropriateness of MINI compared to the clinical interview in a sample of patients with mood disorders in tertiary mental health care.

作者信息

Rodrigues Graziela Smaniotto, Pellini Giorgia Lionço, Rocha Rafael, Lima Ana Flávia, Pio de Almeida Fleck Marcelo, Panzenhagen Alana Castro, Shansis Flávio Milman, Capp Edison

机构信息

Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciências da Saúde, Ginecologia e Obstetrícia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, Brazil; Laboratório de Pesquisa Translacional em Comportamento Suicida (LAPETS), Universidade do Vale do Taquari (UNIVATES), Lajeado, Brazil.

Hospital Psiquiátrico São Pedro, Porto Alegre, Brazil.

出版信息

J Psychiatr Res. 2024 Jan;169:341-346. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2023.11.012. Epub 2023 Nov 28.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) is one of the most used instruments for the assessment of Mental Disorders, playing an essential role in psychiatric research and in clinical and hospital practice. Despite this, the accuracy of the MINI, when used by a psychiatrist, is poorly studied, particularly in relation to Bipolar Disorder (BD). The early diagnosis of BD and Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) is extremely important, as it provides an opportunity for intervention that can reduce the impact on the patient's daily life and functionality. As such, this study assesses the suitability of MINI for diagnosing BD or MDD in a sample of patients with mood disorders.

METHOD

Agreement between the MINI and the clinical interview was assessed in a sample of 347 outpatients by calculating Cohen's kappa, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and the area under the curve (AUC).

RESULTS

The sample consisted of 347 patients with mood disorders. 279 were women (80.40%), 105 (30.3%) were diagnosed with MDD and 242 (69.7%) with BD from the assessment performed in the clinical interview. In the MINI assessment, 97 individuals (28%) were classified with a diagnosis of MDD and 250 (72%) with BD. We found a sensitivity of 87.2% and specificity of 62.8% for the MINI in the diagnosis of BD and a Cohen's kappa between the MINI and the clinical interview of 0.51. The AUC was 0.75.

CONCLUSIONS

MINI has greater sensitivity (87.2%) for the diagnosis of BD and greater specificity (87.2%) for the diagnosis of MDD. In addition, the moderate Cohen kappa (0.51) and AUC (0.75) values between the MINI and the clinical interview are acceptable when considering most available psychiatric diagnostic tools.

摘要

目的

迷你国际神经精神病学访谈量表(MINI)是评估精神障碍最常用的工具之一,在精神病学研究以及临床和医院实践中发挥着重要作用。尽管如此,精神科医生使用MINI时的准确性研究较少,尤其是与双相情感障碍(BD)相关的研究。BD和重度抑郁症(MDD)的早期诊断极为重要,因为它为干预提供了机会,可减少对患者日常生活和功能的影响。因此,本研究评估了MINI在一组情绪障碍患者样本中诊断BD或MDD的适用性。

方法

通过计算科恩kappa系数、敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和曲线下面积(AUC),评估了347名门诊患者样本中MINI与临床访谈之间的一致性。

结果

样本包括347名情绪障碍患者。在临床访谈评估中,279名(80.40%)为女性,105名(30.3%)被诊断为MDD,242名(69.7%)被诊断为BD。在MINI评估中,97名个体(28%)被诊断为MDD,250名(72%)被诊断为BD。我们发现MINI诊断BD的敏感性为87.2%,特异性为62.8%,MINI与临床访谈之间的科恩kappa系数为0.51。AUC为0.75。

结论

MINI诊断BD的敏感性较高(87.2%),诊断MDD的特异性较高(87.2%)。此外,考虑到大多数现有的精神病学诊断工具,MINI与临床访谈之间中等的科恩kappa系数(0.51)和AUC(0.75)值是可以接受的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验