School of Medical, Indigenous and Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.
School of Health Sciences, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.
Nutr Diet. 2024 Apr;81(2):170-179. doi: 10.1111/1747-0080.12857. Epub 2023 Dec 13.
University students may experience food insecurity due to financial constraints, reducing the quality of their diet. This study aimed to identify students at higher risk of food insecurity, their engagement with on-campus food initiatives and evaluate the relationship between food insecurity and a validated index of diet quality.
A cross-sectional online survey used the six-item Household Food Security Survey Module to assess food insecurity. Total diet quality and subscale scores for eight food groups were measured using the Australian Recommended Food Score (range 0-73). Univariate and multivariate regression identified groups at risk of food insecurity, their engagement with campus food initiatives and relationship with diet quality scores.
Of student respondents (n = 197), over half (54%) experienced food insecurity (14% mild, 23% moderate and 18% severe food insecurity). Male students and students not living with parents were at significantly higher risk. Food-insecure students were significantly more likely to use the campus food pantry (odds ratio = 2.3 [95% confidence interval = 1.286-4.142]; p = 0.005) but not a campus community garden. The mean diet quality score was 32.9 (standard deviation = 8.9). Food-insecure students reported a mean diet quality score over three points lower than food-secure respondents (B = -3.5 [95% confidence interval = -6.0 to -1.0]; p = 0.006), with significantly lower fruit and vegetable subscale scores.
Results suggest a high occurrence of food insecurity and poor dietary quality in university students. Despite high levels of engagement with the campus food pantry, the poor diet quality of food-insecure students suggests an urgent need for greater university-led interventions to improve students' dietary intake.
由于经济限制,大学生可能会经历食物不安全,从而降低饮食质量。本研究旨在确定食物不安全风险较高的学生,他们对校内食物计划的参与情况,并评估食物不安全与经过验证的饮食质量指数之间的关系。
采用横断面在线调查,使用六项目家庭食物安全调查模块评估食物不安全。使用澳大利亚推荐食物评分(范围 0-73)测量总饮食质量和 8 种食物组的亚量表评分。单变量和多变量回归确定了食物不安全风险较高的群体、他们对校园食物计划的参与情况以及与饮食质量评分的关系。
在学生受访者(n=197)中,超过一半(54%)经历了食物不安全(14%轻度、23%中度和 18%重度食物不安全)。男性学生和不和父母住在一起的学生风险显著更高。食物不安全的学生更有可能使用校园食品储藏室(优势比=2.3[95%置信区间=1.286-4.142];p=0.005),但不太可能使用校园社区花园。平均饮食质量评分为 32.9(标准差=8.9)。食物不安全的学生报告的饮食质量评分比食物安全的受访者低三分以上(B=-3.5[95%置信区间=-6.0 至-1.0];p=0.006),水果和蔬菜亚量表评分显著较低。
结果表明,大学生中存在较高的食物不安全和较差的饮食质量。尽管对校园食品储藏室的参与度很高,但食物不安全学生的饮食质量较差表明,迫切需要更多的大学主导的干预措施来改善学生的饮食摄入。