Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Nutrients. 2022 Oct 27;14(21):4522. doi: 10.3390/nu14214522.
Poor diet quality is commonly reported in young adults. This study aimed to measure the diet quality of students attending a large Australian university (including domestic and international students), and to examine the effect of food security status and other key factors likely to impact their diet quality. Using the Automated Self-Administered 24-h recall Australian version, a cross-sectional survey collected dietary recalls from domestic and international students in one university in Sydney. Diet quality was assessed using the validated Healthy Eating Index for Australian Adults (HEIFA-2013) which gives a score out of 100. Food security status was measured by the 18-item Household Food Security Survey Module. Differences in the mean HEIFA-2013 scores by student characteristics were determined by analysis of covariance. A total of 141 students completed one dietary recall. The mean HEIFA-2013 score for students was low (mean 52.4, 95% CI 50.0-54.8). Food-insecure students had a poorer diet quality (mean 43.7, 95% CI 35.7-51.8) than their food-secure peers (mean 53.2, 95% CI 50.8-55.7, 0.027). The mean HEIFA-2013 score was similar in domestic (mean 52.5, 95% CI 49.9-55.2) and international students (mean 51.9, 95% CI 46.3-57.5, 0.845). Those reporting self-perceived excellent cooking skills and higher cooking frequency had better diet quality. Interventions to improve food and nutrition knowledge and skills and address food insecurity may help tertiary education students cook more frequently and achieve better diet quality.
年轻人普遍存在饮食质量较差的问题。本研究旨在衡量在澳大利亚一所大型大学就读的学生(包括本地学生和国际学生)的饮食质量,并探讨食品安全状况和其他可能影响其饮食质量的关键因素的影响。研究使用经过验证的澳大利亚成人健康饮食指数(HEIFA-2013)的自动自我管理 24 小时回忆澳大利亚版本,从悉尼一所大学的本地学生和国际学生中收集饮食回忆。饮食质量通过验证的澳大利亚成人健康饮食指数(HEIFA-2013)进行评估,该指数的得分为 100 分。食品安全状况通过 18 项家庭食品保障调查模块进行衡量。通过协方差分析确定学生特征对平均 HEIFA-2013 评分的差异。共有 141 名学生完成了一次饮食回忆。学生的平均 HEIFA-2013 评分较低(平均 52.4,95%CI 50.0-54.8)。与食品安全的同龄人相比(平均 53.2,95%CI 50.8-55.7,0.027),食品不安全的学生饮食质量较差(平均 43.7,95%CI 35.7-51.8)。本地学生(平均 52.5,95%CI 49.9-55.2)和国际学生(平均 51.9,95%CI 46.3-57.5,0.845)的平均 HEIFA-2013 评分相似。报告自我感知烹饪技能优秀和更高烹饪频率的学生饮食质量更好。改善食物和营养知识和技能以及解决食品安全问题的干预措施可能有助于提高高等教育学生的烹饪频率,改善其饮食质量。