Chen Wanting, Wu Shengdong, Gong Lingwen, Guo Yu, Wei Li, Jin Haoran, Zhou Yan, Li Chuanshuang, Lu Caide, Xu Lanman
Department of Infectious Diseases and Liver Diseases, Ningbo Medical Centre Lihuili Hospital, Affiliated Lihuili Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo, China.
Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Ningbo Medical Center Lihuili Hospital, Affiliated Lihuili Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo, China.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Nov 29;10:1274961. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1274961. eCollection 2023.
Sepsis is a severe and common complication of liver transplantation (LT) with a high risk of mortality. However, effective tools for evaluating its risk factors are lacking. Therefore, this study identified the risk factors of early post-liver transplantation sepsis and established a nomogram.
We analyzed the risk factors of post-liver transplantation sepsis in 195 patients. Patients with infection and a systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) score ≥ 2 were diagnosed with sepsis. The predictive indicators were screened with the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and collinearity analyses to develop a nomogram. The prediction performance of the new nomogram model, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, and Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS) was compared through assessment of the area under the curve (AUC), decision curve analysis (DCA), net reclassification index (NRI), and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI).
The nomogram was based on postoperative heart rate, creatinine concentration, PaO/FiO ratio < 400 mmHg, blood glucose concentration, and international normalized ratio. The AUC of the nomogram, the SOFA score, and MEWS were 0.782 (95% confidence interval CI: 0.716-0.847), 0.649 (95% CI: 0.571-0.727), and 0.541 (95% CI: 0.469-0.614), respectively. The DCA curves showed that the net benefit rate of the nomogram was higher than that of the SOFA score and MEWS. The NRI and IDI tests revealed better predictive performance for the nomogram than SOFA score and MEWS.
Heart rate, creatinine concentration, PaO/FiO, glucose concentration, and international normalized ratio should be monitored postoperatively for patients at risk of post-liver transplantation sepsis. The nomogram based on the aforementioned risk factors had a better predictive performance than SOFA score and MEWS.
脓毒症是肝移植(LT)严重且常见的并发症,死亡率高。然而,缺乏评估其危险因素的有效工具。因此,本研究确定了肝移植术后早期脓毒症的危险因素并建立了列线图。
我们分析了195例肝移植术后脓毒症的危险因素。感染且全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)评分≥2的患者被诊断为脓毒症。通过最小绝对收缩和选择算子(LASSO)及共线性分析筛选预测指标以建立列线图。通过评估曲线下面积(AUC)、决策曲线分析(DCA)、净重新分类指数(NRI)和综合判别改善(IDI),比较新列线图模型、序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分和改良早期预警评分(MEWS)的预测性能。
列线图基于术后心率、肌酐浓度、PaO/FiO比值<400 mmHg、血糖浓度和国际标准化比值。列线图、SOFA评分和MEWS的AUC分别为0.782(95%置信区间CI:0.716 - 0.847)、0.649(95% CI:0.571 - 0.727)和0.541(95% CI:0.469 - 0.614)。DCA曲线显示列线图的净获益率高于SOFA评分和MEWS。NRI和IDI测试显示列线图的预测性能优于SOFA评分和MEWS。
对于有肝移植术后脓毒症风险的患者,术后应监测心率、肌酐浓度、PaO/FiO、血糖浓度和国际标准化比值。基于上述危险因素的列线图比SOFA评分和MEWS具有更好的预测性能。