Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Clinical Research, Investigation, and Systems Modeling of Acute Illness (CRISMA) Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
JAMA Surg. 2022 Sep 1;157(9):817-826. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.2761.
Rapid source control is recommended to improve patient outcomes in sepsis. Yet there are few data to guide how rapidly source control is required.
To determine the association between time to source control and patient outcomes in community-acquired sepsis.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICPANTS: Multihospital integrated health care system cohort study of hospitalized adults (January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2017) with community-acquired sepsis as defined by Sepsis-3 who underwent source control procedures. Follow-up continued through January 1, 2019, and data analyses were completed March 17, 2022.
Early (<6 hours) compared with late (6-36 hours) source control as well as each hour of source control delay (1-36 hours) from sepsis onset.
Multivariable models were clustered at the level of hospital with adjustment for patient factors, sepsis severity, resource availability, and the physiologic stress of procedures generating adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% CI.
Of 4962 patients with sepsis (mean [SD] age, 62 [16] years; 52% male; 85% White; mean [SD] Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score, 3.8 [2.5]), source control occurred at a median (IQR) of 15.4 hours (5.5-21.7) after sepsis onset, with 1315 patients (27%) undergoing source control within 6 hours. The crude 90-day mortality was similar for early and late source control (n = 177 [14%] vs n = 529 [15%]; P = .35). In multivariable models, early source control was associated with decreased risk-adjusted odds of 90-day mortality (aOR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.63-0.80). This association was greater among gastrointestinal and abdominal (aOR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.43-0.80) and soft tissue interventions (aOR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.55-0.95) compared with orthopedic and cranial interventions (aOR, 1.33; 95% CI, 0.96-1.83; P < .001 for interaction).
Source control within 6 hours of community-acquired sepsis onset was associated with a reduced risk-adjusted odds of 90-day mortality. Prioritizing the rapid identification of septic foci and initiation of source control interventions can reduce the number of avoidable deaths among patients with sepsis.
快速控制感染源被推荐用于改善脓毒症患者的预后。然而,目前几乎没有数据可以指导我们需要多快控制感染源。
确定社区获得性脓毒症患者的感染源控制时间与患者预后之间的关联。
设计、地点和参与者:这是一项多医院综合医疗保健系统队列研究,纳入了 2013 年 1 月 1 日至 2017 年 12 月 31 日期间被诊断为脓毒症-3 的社区获得性脓毒症住院成人患者,并接受了感染源控制治疗。随访持续到 2019 年 1 月 1 日,数据分析于 2022 年 3 月 17 日完成。
与晚期(6-36 小时)相比,早期(<6 小时)进行感染源控制,以及从脓毒症发作开始后每延迟 1 小时到 36 小时进行感染源控制(1-36 小时)。
采用医院聚类的多变量模型,对患者因素、脓毒症严重程度、资源可用性以及产生调整后优势比(aOR)和 95%置信区间的操作生理应激进行调整。
在 4962 名脓毒症患者中(平均[标准差]年龄为 62[16]岁;52%为男性;85%为白人;平均[标准差]序贯器官衰竭评估评分 3.8[2.5]),感染源控制中位数(IQR)发生在脓毒症发作后 15.4 小时(5.5-21.7),1315 名患者(27%)在 6 小时内进行了感染源控制。早期和晚期感染源控制的 90 天死亡率相似(n=177[14%] vs n=529[15%];P=0.35)。在多变量模型中,早期感染源控制与降低 90 天死亡率的风险调整优势比相关(aOR,0.71;95%CI,0.63-0.80)。与骨科和颅骨干预(aOR,1.33;95%CI,0.96-1.83;P<.001 用于交互作用)相比,这种关联在胃肠道和腹部(aOR,0.56;95%CI,0.43-0.80)和软组织干预(aOR,0.72;95%CI,0.55-0.95)中更大。
社区获得性脓毒症发作后 6 小时内进行感染源控制与降低 90 天死亡率的风险调整优势比相关。优先快速识别感染灶并启动感染源控制干预措施,可以减少脓毒症患者中可避免的死亡人数。