Department of Biological Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Department of Genetics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Genome Biol Evol. 2023 Dec 1;15(12). doi: 10.1093/gbe/evad203.
When the ancestors of modern Eurasians migrated out of Africa and interbred with Eurasian archaic hominins, namely, Neanderthals and Denisovans, DNA of archaic ancestry integrated into the genomes of anatomically modern humans. This process potentially accelerated adaptation to Eurasian environmental factors, including reduced ultraviolet radiation and increased variation in seasonal dynamics. However, whether these groups differed substantially in circadian biology and whether archaic introgression adaptively contributed to human chronotypes remain unknown. Here, we traced the evolution of chronotype based on genomes from archaic hominins and present-day humans. First, we inferred differences in circadian gene sequences, splicing, and regulation between archaic hominins and modern humans. We identified 28 circadian genes containing variants with potential to alter splicing in archaics (e.g., CLOCK, PER2, RORB, and RORC) and 16 circadian genes likely divergently regulated between present-day humans and archaic hominins, including RORA. These differences suggest the potential for introgression to modify circadian gene expression. Testing this hypothesis, we found that introgressed variants are enriched among expression quantitative trait loci for circadian genes. Supporting the functional relevance of these regulatory effects, we found that many introgressed alleles have associations with chronotype. Strikingly, the strongest introgressed effects on chronotype increase morningness, consistent with adaptations to high latitude in other species. Finally, we identified several circadian loci with evidence of adaptive introgression or latitudinal clines in allele frequency. These findings identify differences in circadian gene regulation between modern humans and archaic hominins and support the contribution of introgression via coordinated effects on variation in human chronotype.
当现代欧亚人的祖先从非洲迁徙出来并与欧亚古人类(即尼安德特人和丹尼索瓦人)杂交时,古人类的 DNA 就整合到了现代人类的基因组中。这个过程可能加速了对欧亚大陆环境因素的适应,包括减少紫外线辐射和增加季节性动态变化。然而,这些群体在生物钟生物学方面是否存在显著差异,以及古人类的基因渗入是否适应性地促进了人类的生物钟类型,这些仍然未知。在这里,我们根据古人类和现代人类的基因组追踪了生物钟类型的进化。首先,我们推断了古人类和现代人类之间生物钟基因序列、剪接和调控的差异。我们确定了 28 个包含潜在改变古人类剪接的变体的生物钟基因(例如 CLOCK、PER2、RORB 和 RORC),以及 16 个可能在现代人类和古人类之间存在不同调控的生物钟基因,包括 RORA。这些差异表明基因渗入有可能改变生物钟基因的表达。为了验证这一假说,我们发现,渗入的变体在生物钟基因的表达数量性状基因座中富集。这些调节效应具有功能相关性的证据支持了这一假说,我们发现许多渗入的等位基因与生物钟类型有关。引人注目的是,对生物钟类型影响最大的渗入效应增加了早晨倾向,这与其他物种对高纬度地区的适应一致。最后,我们确定了几个具有适应性基因渗入或等位基因频率纬度梯度的生物钟基因座。这些发现确定了现代人类和古人类之间生物钟基因调控的差异,并支持通过协调影响人类生物钟类型的变化来促进基因渗入。