Hygiene Laboratories, Department of Biology, University of Naples Federico II, Via Cinthia 21, I-80126 Naples, Italy; Hygiene Laboratory, Centro Servizi Metrologici e Tecnologici Avanzati (CeSMA), University of Naples Federico II, Corso Nicolangelo Protopisani, NA, Naples 80146, Italy.
Acqua & Sole s.r.l., Via Giulio Natta, Vellezzo Bellini, 27010 Pavia, Italy.
Sci Total Environ. 2024 Feb 20;912:169341. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.169341. Epub 2023 Dec 12.
The present study investigates the ecotoxicity of 7 biofertilizers, including biowaste-derived organic matrices. Real-field tests were conducted to assess the impacts of soil fertilization with sewage sludge digestate from high-solid thermophilic anaerobic digestion (HSTAD) compared to those obtained on non-amended and urea-fertilized soils. The physical-chemical and ecotoxic impact of HSTAD digestate on soil was monitored for 12 months, at 5 time points and 2 soil depths, on a maize field divided in 3 portions (non-treated, fertilized with urea, amended with digestate). The chemical and physical characteristics of the soil were previously analyzed for 3 years to provide a long-term outlook of the impacts of biofertilizer application. Seven bioindicators were utilized for direct (on whole soil) and indirect (on soil elutriates) ecotoxicological tests on fertilizers and amended soils, including plant seeds (Lepidium sativum, Sorghum saccharatum, and Sinapsis alba), the aquatic organism Daphnia magna, the alga Raphidocelis subcapitata, the luminescent bacterium Aliivibrio fischeri, and the Nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. No serious negative effects on soil fertilized with HSTAD digestate were evidenced. Conversely, bioassays rather showed positive effects, encouraging the utilization of HSTAD digestate in agriculture, considering the proper concentrations of use. The obtained data were interpolated and a test battery integrated index was generated, confirming the absence of ecotoxicological risk for the soils amended with the applied fertilizers. The long-term evolution of the physical-chemical soil characteristics (including the concentrations of potential contaminants) was similar for both HSTAD digestate and urea application as well as for non-fertilized soil, indicating no negative effects due to digestate application on land. On the contrary, digestate application improved the content of stabilized organic matter and nutrients in soil. This study proposes a more correct approach to ecotoxicity assessment of fertilized soils for biofertilizer evaluation and demonstrates the long-term safe application of HSTAD digestate on agricultural soil.
本研究调查了 7 种生物肥料的生态毒性,包括生物废物衍生的有机基质。进行了现场试验,以评估与未施肥和尿素施肥土壤相比,用高温好氧厌氧消化(HSTAD)产生的污水污泥消化物施肥对土壤的影响。在 12 个月内,分 5 个时间点和 2 个土壤深度,在一块分为 3 个部分的玉米地(未处理、用尿素施肥、用消化物施肥)上监测 HSTAD 消化物对土壤的物理化学和生态毒性影响。在 3 年内对土壤的化学和物理特性进行了分析,以提供生物肥料应用影响的长期展望。利用 7 种生物指示剂进行了直接(对整个土壤)和间接(对土壤浸出液)的肥料和施肥土壤生态毒性测试,包括植物种子(生菜、高粱和白芥)、水生物大腹圆趾蟾、绿藻莱茵衣藻、发光细菌发光杆菌和线虫秀丽隐杆线虫。在 HSTAD 消化物施肥的土壤中,没有证据表明有严重的负面影响。相反,生物测定结果显示出积极的影响,鼓励在农业中使用 HSTAD 消化物,只要使用适当的浓度。将获得的数据进行内插,并生成一个测试电池综合指数,证实了应用肥料施肥的土壤没有生态毒性风险。HSTAD 消化物和尿素应用以及未施肥土壤的土壤物理化学特性(包括潜在污染物浓度)的长期演变相似,表明消化物应用对土地没有负面影响。相反,消化物的应用提高了土壤中稳定有机质和养分的含量。本研究提出了一种更正确的方法来评估施肥土壤的生态毒性,以评估生物肥料,并证明 HSTAD 消化物在农业土壤上的长期安全应用。