Departments of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2024 Apr 1;118(5):1507-1518. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.12.002. Epub 2023 Dec 12.
The intracranial benefit of offering dual immune-checkpoint inhibition (D-ICPI) with ipilimumab and nivolumab to patients with melanoma or non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases (BMs) is unknown. We hypothesized that D-ICPI improves local control compared with SRS alone.
Patients with melanoma or NSCLC treated with SRS from 2014 to 2022 were evaluated. Patients were stratified by treatment with D-ICPI, single ICPI (S-ICPI), or SRS alone. Local recurrence, intracranial progression (IP), and overall survival were estimated using competing risk and Kaplan-Meier analyses. IP included both local and distant intracranial recurrence.
Two hundred eighty-eight patients (44% melanoma, 56% NSCLC) with 1,704 BMs were included. Fifty-three percent of patients had symptomatic BMs. The median follow-up was 58.8 months. Twelve-month local control rates with D-ICPI, S-ICPI, and SRS alone were 94.73% (95% CI, 91.11%-96.90%), 91.74% (95% CI, 89.30%-93.64%), and 88.26% (95% CI, 84.07%-91.41%). On Kaplan-Meier analysis, only D-ICPI was significantly associated with reduced local recurrence (P = .0032). On multivariate Cox regression, D-ICPI (hazard ratio [HR], 0.4003; 95% CI, 0.1781-0.8728; P = .0239) and planning target volume (HR, 1.022; 95% CI, 1.004-1.035; P = .0059) correlated with local control. One hundred seventy-three (60%) patients developed IP. The 12-month cumulative incidence of IP was 41.27% (95% CI, 30.27%-51.92%), 51.86% (95% CI, 42.78%-60.19%), and 57.15% (95% CI, 44.98%-67.59%) after D-ICPI, S-ICPI, and SRS alone. On competing risk analysis, only D-ICPI was significantly associated with reduced IP (P = .0408). On multivariate Cox regression, D-ICPI (HR, 0.595; 95% CI, 0.373-0.951; P = .0300) and presentation with >10 BMs (HR, 2.492; 95% CI, 1.668-3.725; P < .0001) remained significantly correlated with IP. The median overall survival after D-ICPI, S-ICPI, and SRS alone was 26.1 (95% CI, 15.5-40.7), 21.5 (16.5-29.6), and 17.5 (11.3-23.8) months. S-ICPI, fractionation, and histology were not associated with clinical outcomes. There was no difference in hospitalizations or neurologic adverse events between cohorts.
The addition of D-ICPI for patients with melanoma and NSCLC undergoing SRS is associated with improved local and intracranial control. This appears to be an effective strategy, including for patients with symptomatic or multiple BMs.
对于接受立体定向放射外科(SRS)治疗脑转移瘤(BMs)的黑色素瘤或非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者,联合使用伊匹单抗和纳武单抗的双重免疫检查点抑制(D-ICPI)是否能带来颅内获益尚不清楚。我们假设 D-ICPI 可改善局部控制,优于单独的 SRS。
评估了 2014 年至 2022 年接受 SRS 治疗的黑色素瘤或 NSCLC 患者。根据 D-ICPI、单免疫检查点抑制剂(S-ICPI)或单独 SRS 治疗对患者进行分层。使用竞争风险和 Kaplan-Meier 分析估计局部复发、颅内进展(IP)和总生存。IP 包括局部和远处颅内复发。
共纳入 288 例(44%黑色素瘤,56% NSCLC)1704 个 BMs 的患者。53%的患者有症状性 BMs。中位随访时间为 58.8 个月。D-ICPI、S-ICPI 和单独 SRS 的 12 个月局部控制率分别为 94.73%(95% CI,91.11%-96.90%)、91.74%(95% CI,89.30%-93.64%)和 88.26%(95% CI,84.07%-91.41%)。在 Kaplan-Meier 分析中,只有 D-ICPI 与降低局部复发显著相关(P =.0032)。多因素 Cox 回归分析显示,D-ICPI(风险比 [HR],0.4003;95% CI,0.1781-0.8728;P =.0239)和计划靶区体积(HR,1.022;95% CI,1.004-1.035;P =.0059)与局部控制相关。173 例(60%)患者发生 IP。D-ICPI、S-ICPI 和单独 SRS 的 12 个月累积 IP 发生率分别为 41.27%(95% CI,30.27%-51.92%)、51.86%(95% CI,42.78%-60.19%)和 57.15%(95% CI,44.98%-67.59%)。在竞争风险分析中,只有 D-ICPI 与降低 IP 显著相关(P =.0408)。多因素 Cox 回归分析显示,D-ICPI(HR,0.595;95% CI,0.373-0.951;P =.0300)和>10 个 BMs 的表现(HR,2.492;95% CI,1.668-3.725;P <.0001)与 IP 仍显著相关。D-ICPI、S-ICPI 和单独 SRS 后中位总生存期分别为 26.1(95% CI,15.5-40.7)、21.5(16.5-29.6)和 17.5(11.3-23.8)个月。S-ICPI、分割和组织学与临床结果无关。各组之间的住院和神经不良事件无差异。
对于接受 SRS 治疗的黑色素瘤和 NSCLC 患者,联合使用 D-ICPI 可改善局部和颅内控制。这似乎是一种有效的策略,包括对有症状或多发性 BMs 的患者。