• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

髋部骨折患者手术时间的语境决定因素。

Contextual Determinants of Time to Surgery for Patients With Hip Fracture.

机构信息

VOICES Health Policy Research Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Redwood City, California.

Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Dec 1;6(12):e2347834. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.47834.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.47834
PMID:38100104
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10724766/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Surgery within 24 hours after a hip fracture improves patient morbidity and mortality, which has led some hospitals to launch quality improvement programs (eg, targeted resource management, documented protocols) to address delays. However, these programs have had mixed results in terms of decreased time to surgery (TTS), identifying an opportunity to improve the effectiveness of interventions.

OBJECTIVE

To identify the contextual determinants (site-specific barriers and facilitators) of TTS for patients with hip fracture across diverse hospitals.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This qualitative mixed-methods study used an exploratory sequential design that comprised 2 phases. In phase 1, qualitative semistructured interviews were conducted with stakeholders involved in hip fracture care (orthopedic surgeons or residents, emergency medicine physicians, hospitalists, anesthesiologists, nurses, and clinical or support staff) at 4 hospitals with differing financial, operational, and educational structures. Interviews were completed between May and July 2021. In phase 2, a quantitative survey assessing contextual determinants of TTS within 24 hours for adult patients with hip fracture was completed by orthopedic surgeon leaders representing 23 diverse hospitals across the US between May and July 2022. Data analysis was performed in August 2022.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Thematic analysis of the interviews identified themes of contextual determinants of TTS within 24 hours for patients with hip fracture. The emergent contextual determinants were then measured across multiple hospitals, and frequency and distribution were used to assess associations between determinants and various hospital characteristics (eg, setting, number of beds).

RESULTS

A total of 34 stakeholders were interviewed in phase 1, and 23 surveys were completed in phase 2. More than half of respondents in both phases were men (19 [56%] and 18 [78%], respectively). The following 4 themes of contextual determinants of TTS within 24 hours were identified: availability, care coordination, improvement climate, and incentive structure. Within these themes, the most commonly identified determinants across the various hospitals involved operating room availability, a formal comanagement system between orthopedics and medicine or geriatrics, the presence of a physician champion focused on timely surgery, and a program that facilitates improvement work.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this study, contextual determinants of TTS within 24 hours for patients with hip fracture varied across hospital sites and could not be generalized across various hospital contexts because no 2 sites had identical profiles. As such, these findings suggest that guidance on strategies for improving TTS should be based on the contextual determinants unique to each hospital.

摘要

重要性

髋部骨折后 24 小时内进行手术可改善患者的发病率和死亡率,这促使一些医院启动质量改进计划(例如,针对性资源管理、有记录的协议)以解决延迟问题。然而,这些计划在缩短手术时间(TTS)方面的效果各不相同,这表明有机会提高干预措施的效果。

目的

确定不同医院髋部骨折患者 TTS 的背景决定因素(特定于地点的障碍和促进因素)。

设计、设置和参与者:这是一项采用探索性序贯设计的定性混合方法研究,包括 2 个阶段。在第 1 阶段,对参与髋部骨折护理的利益相关者(骨科医生或住院医师、急诊医生、医院医生、麻醉师、护士以及临床或支持人员)进行了半结构化访谈,这些利益相关者来自 4 家具有不同财务、运营和教育结构的医院。访谈于 2021 年 5 月至 7 月进行。在第 2 阶段,2022 年 5 月至 7 月,代表美国 23 家不同医院的骨科医生领导完成了一项评估成人髋部骨折患者 24 小时内 TTS 的背景决定因素的定量调查。数据分析于 2022 年 8 月进行。

主要结果和措施

对访谈的主题分析确定了髋部骨折患者 24 小时内 TTS 的背景决定因素。然后在多个医院中测量了新出现的背景决定因素,并使用频率和分布来评估决定因素与各种医院特征(例如,设置、床位数)之间的关联。

结果

第 1 阶段共访谈了 34 名利益相关者,第 2 阶段完成了 23 份调查。两个阶段的受访者中均有一半以上是男性(分别为 19 名[56%]和 18 名[78%])。确定了以下 4 个与 24 小时内 TTS 相关的背景决定因素主题:可用性、护理协调、改进氛围和激励结构。在这些主题中,不同医院最常涉及的决定因素包括手术室可用性、骨科和内科或老年病学之间的正式共同管理系统、专注于及时手术的医生冠军的存在以及促进改进工作的计划。

结论和相关性

在这项研究中,髋部骨折患者 24 小时内 TTS 的背景决定因素因医院地点而异,由于没有两个地点具有相同的特征,因此无法在不同的医院环境中进行概括。因此,这些发现表明,改善 TTS 的策略指导应该基于每个医院特有的背景决定因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4aed/10724766/8e04fac271a1/jamanetwopen-e2347834-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4aed/10724766/8e04fac271a1/jamanetwopen-e2347834-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4aed/10724766/8e04fac271a1/jamanetwopen-e2347834-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Contextual Determinants of Time to Surgery for Patients With Hip Fracture.髋部骨折患者手术时间的语境决定因素。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Dec 1;6(12):e2347834. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.47834.
2
Evaluation of Systemwide Improvement Programs to Optimize Time to Surgery for Patients With Hip Fractures: A Systematic Review.系统改进项目以优化髋部骨折患者手术时间的评估:系统评价。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Sep 1;5(9):e2231911. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.31911.
3
Implementation of a Geriatrics-Focused Orthopaedic and Hospitalist Fracture Program Decreases Perioperative Complications and Improves Resource Utilization.实施以老年医学为重点的骨科与内科医生骨折治疗项目可降低围手术期并发症并改善资源利用。
J Orthop Trauma. 2022 Apr 1;36(4):213-217. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000002258.
4
Patient and hospital-level factors associated with time to surgery after hip fracture in Ireland: Analysis of national audit data 2016-2020.爱尔兰髋部骨折后手术时间相关的患者和医院层面因素:2016 - 2020年国家审计数据分析
Injury. 2023 Apr 16. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2023.04.038.
5
An Orthopedic-Hospitalist Comanaged Hip Fracture Service Reduces Inpatient Length of Stay.骨科-住院医师共同管理的髋部骨折治疗服务可缩短住院时间。
Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2016 Dec;7(4):171-177. doi: 10.1177/2151458516661383. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
6
Complex organisational factors influence multidisciplinary care for patients with hip fractures: a qualitative study of barriers and facilitators to service delivery.复杂的组织因素影响髋部骨折患者的多学科护理:对服务提供的障碍和促进因素的定性研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Feb 16;24(1):128. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06164-9.
7
Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data.医疗服务量与健康结果:来自系统评价及意大利医院数据评估的证据
Epidemiol Prev. 2017 Sep-Dec;41(5-6 (Suppl 2)):1-128. doi: 10.19191/EP17.5-6S2.P001.100.
8
Impact of Preoperative Specialty Consults on Hospitalist Comanagement of Hip Fracture Patients.术前专科会诊对髋部骨折患者主治医生共管的影响。
J Hosp Med. 2020 Jan 1;15(1):16-21. doi: 10.12788/jhm.3264. Epub 2019 Aug 16.
9
No Differences Between White and Non-White Patients in Terms of Care Quality Metrics, Complications, and Death After Hip Fracture Surgery When Standardized Care Pathways Are Used.在使用标准化护理路径的情况下,白人患者和非白人患者在护理质量指标、并发症和髋部骨折手术后的死亡率方面没有差异。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023 Feb 1;481(2):324-335. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002142. Epub 2022 Mar 1.
10
Streamlining an existing hip fracture patient pathway in an acute tertiary adult Irish hospital to improve patient experience and outcomes.简化爱尔兰一家大型成人急症医院现有的髋部骨折患者治疗路径,以改善患者体验和治疗结果。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2019 Dec 22;31(Supplement_1):45-51. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzz093.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of three sequential orthogeriatric care models on time to surgery after hip fracture: a retrospective study.三种连续的骨科老年护理模式对髋部骨折后手术时间的影响:一项回顾性研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2025 Jul 11;25(1):515. doi: 10.1186/s12877-025-06156-5.
2
Managing Mortality: Key Factors Influencing Hemiarthroplasty Outcomes in Geriatric Patients with Proximal Femur Fractures.控制死亡率:影响老年股骨近端骨折患者半髋关节置换术预后的关键因素
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Mar 22;61(4):568. doi: 10.3390/medicina61040568.

本文引用的文献

1
Effects of hospitalist co-management for hip fractures.髋部骨折医院医师共管的效果。
J Orthop Sci. 2024 Jan;29(1):278-285. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2022.11.004. Epub 2022 Nov 26.
2
AAOS Clinical Practice Guideline Summary: Management of Hip Fractures in Older Adults.美国骨科学会临床实践指南摘要:老年髋部骨折的管理
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2022 Oct 15;30(20):e1291-e1296. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-22-00125. Epub 2022 Jun 17.
3
Evaluation of Systemwide Improvement Programs to Optimize Time to Surgery for Patients With Hip Fractures: A Systematic Review.
系统改进项目以优化髋部骨折患者手术时间的评估:系统评价。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Sep 1;5(9):e2231911. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.31911.
4
The association between surgical fixation of hip fractures within 24 hours and mortality : a systematic review and meta-analysis.髋部骨折 24 小时内手术固定与死亡率的关联:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Bone Joint J. 2021 Jul;103-B(7):1176-1186. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.103B7.BJJ-2020-2582.R1.
5
Geriatric fracture centre vs usual care after proximal femur fracture in older patients: what are the benefits? Results of a large international prospective multicentre study.老年髋部骨折患者在骨科骨折中心与常规治疗后:有哪些获益?一项大型国际前瞻性多中心研究的结果。
BMJ Open. 2021 May 10;11(5):e039960. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039960.
6
Effect of a 6 am-9 am Dedicated Orthopaedic Trauma Room on Hip Fracture Outcomes in a Community Level II Trauma Center.上午6点至9点的专门骨科创伤室对社区二级创伤中心髋部骨折治疗结果的影响
J Orthop Trauma. 2021 May 1;35(5):245-251. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001966.
7
Establishing a Geriatric Hip Fracture Program at a Level 1 Community Trauma Center.在一级社区创伤中心建立老年髋部骨折项目。
Orthop Nurs. 2020 May/Jun;39(3):171-179. doi: 10.1097/NOR.0000000000000655.
8
A Reimbursement System Based on a 48-Hour Target Time for Surgery Shortens the Waiting Time for Hip Fracture Fixation in Elderly Patients.基于48小时手术目标时间的报销系统缩短了老年患者髋部骨折固定手术的等待时间。
J Orthop Trauma. 2020 May;34(5):248-251. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001681.
9
Choosing implementation strategies to address contextual barriers: diversity in recommendations and future directions.选择实施策略以解决背景障碍:建议的多样性和未来方向。
Implement Sci. 2019 Apr 29;14(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s13012-019-0892-4.
10
The orthogeriatric comanagement improves clinical outcomes of hip fracture in older adults.骨科老年病学联合管理可改善老年髋部骨折患者的临床转归。
Osteoporos Int. 2019 Apr;30(4):907-916. doi: 10.1007/s00198-019-04858-2. Epub 2019 Feb 4.