Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Department of Medicine, UMass Chan Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA.
Liver Transpl. 2024 Jun 1;30(6):618-627. doi: 10.1097/LVT.0000000000000313. Epub 2023 Dec 18.
Disparities exist in the access to living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in the United States. However, the association of neighborhood-level social determinants of health (SDoH) on the receipt of LDLT is not well-established. This was a retrospective cohort study of adult liver transplant recipients between January 1, 2005 and December 31, 2021 at centers performing LDLT using the United Network for Organ Sharing database, which was linked through patients' ZIP code to a set of 24 neighborhood-level SDoH measures from different data sources. Temporal trends and center differences in neighborhood Social Deprivation Index (SDI), a validated scale of socioeconomic deprivation ranging from 0 to 100 (0=least disadvantaged), were assessed by transplant type. Multivariable logistic regression evaluated the association of increasing SDI on receipt of LDLT [vs. deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT)]. There were 51,721 DDLT and 4026 LDLT recipients at 59 LDLT-performing centers during the study period. Of the 24 neighborhood-level SDoH measures studied, the SDI was most different between the 2 transplant types, with LDLT recipients having lower SDI (ie, less socioeconomic disadvantage) than DDLT recipients (median SDI 37 vs. 47; p < 0.001). The median difference in SDI between the LDLT and DDLT groups significantly decreased from 13 in 2005 to 3 in 2021 ( p = 0.003). In the final model, the SDI quintile was independently associated with transplant type ( p < 0.001) with a threshold SDI of ~40, above which increasing SDI was significantly associated with reduced odds of LDLT (vs. reference SDI 1-20). As a neighborhood-level SDoH measure, SDI is useful for evaluating disparities in the context of LDLT. Center outreach efforts that aim to reduce disparities in LDLT could preferentially target US ZIP codes with SDI > 40.
在美国,活体供肝移植(LDLT)的可及性存在差异。然而,社区层面健康社会决定因素(SDoH)对 LDLT 接受程度的影响尚不清楚。这是一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了 2005 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 12 月 31 日期间在美国进行 LDLT 的中心的成年肝移植受者,使用了器官共享联合网络数据库,该数据库通过患者的邮政编码与来自不同数据源的 24 个社区层面 SDoH 指标相关联。通过移植类型评估了社会剥夺指数(SDI)的时间趋势和中心差异,SDI 是一种验证的社会经济剥夺程度的有效衡量标准,范围从 0 到 100(0=最不受影响)。多变量逻辑回归评估了 SDI 增加与 LDLT 接受率之间的关联[与死亡供体肝移植(DDLT)相比]。在研究期间,59 个 LDLT 中心进行了 51721 例 DDLT 和 4026 例 LDLT。在所研究的 24 个社区层面 SDoH 指标中,SDI 在两种移植类型之间的差异最大,LDLT 受者的 SDI (即社会经济劣势程度)低于 DDLT 受者(中位数 SDI 为 37 比 47;p <0.001)。2005 年 LDLT 组和 DDLT 组之间的 SDI 中位数差异从 13 显著下降到 2021 年的 3(p = 0.003)。在最终模型中,SDI 五分位数与移植类型独立相关(p <0.001),SDI 阈值约为 40,高于该阈值,SDI 增加与 LDLT 的可能性降低显著相关(与参考 SDI 1-20 相比)。作为社区层面的 SDoH 衡量标准,SDI 可用于评估 LDLT 背景下的差异。旨在减少 LDLT 差异的中心外展工作可以优先针对 SDI > 40 的美国邮政编码。