Department of Surgery, The Research Institute for Transplantation Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Int J Surg. 2023 Nov 1;109(11):3459-3466. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000634.
The benefits of living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in patients with a high Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) score (who have high waitlist mortality) are unclear. Regional availability of deceased-donor organs must be considered when evaluating LDLT benefits. The authors aimed to compare the survival benefit of intended-LDLT to awaiting deceased-donor liver transplantation (DDLT) in patients with a MELD score greater than or equal to 30 in a region with severe organ shortage.
This retrospective review included 649 patients with a MELD score greater than or equal to 30 placed on the liver transplantation waitlist. They were divided into intended-LDLT ( n =205) or waiting-DDLT ( n =444) groups based on living-donor eligibility and compared for patient survival from the time of waitlisting. Post-transplantation outcomes of transplant recipients and living donors were analyzed.
Intended-LDLT patients had higher 1-year survival than waiting-DDLT patients (53.7 vs. 28.8%, P <0.001). LDLT was independently associated with lower mortality [hazard ratio (HR), 0.62; 95% CI, 0.48-0.79; P <0.001]. During follow-up, 25 patients were de-listed, 120 underwent LDLT, 170 underwent DDLT, and 334 remained on the waitlist. Among patients undergoing transplantation, the risk of post-transplantation mortality was similar for LDLT and DDLT after adjusting for pretransplantation MELD score (HR, 1.86; 95% CI, 0.73-4.75; P =0.193), despite increased surgical complications after LDLT (33.1 vs. 19.4%, P =0.013). There was no mortality among living-donors, but 4.2% experienced complications of grade 3 or higher.
Compared to awaiting DDLT, LDLT offers survival benefits for patients with a MELD score greater than or equal to 30, while maintaining acceptable donor outcomes. LDLT is a feasible treatment for patients with a MELD score greater than or equal to 30 in regions with severe organ shortages.
对于终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分较高(等待名单死亡率较高)的活体供肝肝移植(LDLT)患者,活体供肝肝移植的益处尚不清楚。在评估 LDLT 的益处时,必须考虑到死体供体器官的区域可用性。作者旨在比较 MELD 评分大于或等于 30 的患者中,预期 LDLT 与等待死体供肝肝移植(DDLT)的生存获益,这些患者所在区域的器官严重短缺。
本回顾性研究纳入了 649 名 MELD 评分大于或等于 30 的患者,这些患者均被列入肝移植等待名单。根据活体供体的资格,他们被分为预期 LDLT(n=205)或等待 DDLT(n=444)组,并比较从列入等待名单开始的患者生存情况。分析移植受者和活体供者的移植后结局。
预期 LDLT 患者的 1 年生存率高于等待 DDLT 患者(53.7%比 28.8%,P<0.001)。LDLT 与死亡率降低独立相关[风险比(HR),0.62;95%可信区间,0.48-0.79;P<0.001]。随访期间,25 名患者被除名,120 名患者接受 LDLT,170 名患者接受 DDLT,334 名患者仍在等待名单上。在接受移植的患者中,在调整移植前 MELD 评分后,LDLT 和 DDLT 的移植后死亡率风险相似(HR,1.86;95%可信区间,0.73-4.75;P=0.193),尽管 LDLT 后手术并发症增加(33.1%比 19.4%,P=0.013)。活体供者无死亡,但 4.2%发生 3 级或更高级别的并发症。
与等待 DDLT 相比,LDLT 为 MELD 评分大于或等于 30 的患者提供生存获益,同时保持可接受的供者结局。在器官严重短缺的地区,LDLT 是 MELD 评分大于或等于 30 的患者的一种可行治疗方法。