Hirschberg G G, Fatt I, Brown R D
Scand J Rehabil Med. 1986;18(4):173-5.
On manual testing for skinfold tenderness greater resistance has been reported in patients with marked skinfold tenderness. On objective measurement of skin mobility, by raising a skinfold with a vacuum pump and by establishing a stress/strain curve, no difference in skin mobility was found between subjects with and without skinfold tenderness. Furthermore, contrary to manual testing, the suction testing causes no pain in subjects with clinical skinfold tenderness. In a second series of suction tests, comparing skin mobility in a subject with relaxed and contracted underlying muscles, it was found that muscular contraction reduces skin mobility by 50%. The conclusion is that resistance felt by manual skinfold testing is not inherent in the structures, but is caused by contraction of underlying muscles because of pain caused by the manual skinfold test.
在对皮褶压痛进行手动测试时,据报告,皮褶压痛明显的患者存在更大的阻力。在通过用真空泵提起皮褶并建立应力/应变曲线对皮肤移动性进行客观测量时,发现有皮褶压痛和无皮褶压痛的受试者之间皮肤移动性没有差异。此外,与手动测试相反,吸力测试不会给有临床皮褶压痛的受试者带来疼痛。在第二系列的吸力测试中,比较受试者在其下方肌肉放松和收缩时的皮肤移动性,发现肌肉收缩会使皮肤移动性降低50%。结论是,手动皮褶测试感觉到的阻力并非结构所固有,而是由手动皮褶测试引起的疼痛导致下方肌肉收缩所致。