Department of Prevention and Community Health, Milken Institute School of Public Health, The George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia.
Power to Decide, Washington, District of Columbia.
Womens Health Issues. 2024 Mar-Apr;34(2):142-147. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2023.10.003. Epub 2023 Dec 14.
In light of the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization decision overturning Roe v. Wade, the number of people who need to travel out of state for abortion is increasing as several states impose abortion bans. Better understanding the characteristics of patients who obtained out-of-state abortions before the decision can provide a reference point for future research and inform efforts to improve abortion access.
We used data from the 2014 Abortion Patient Survey, administered by the Guttmacher Institute, to examine the prevalence and characteristics of patients obtaining nonhospital abortions outside of their state of residence. We examined bivariate and multivariable associations between selected characteristics and obtaining an abortion out of state.
Six percent of abortion patients traveled out of state for care. Among patients who obtained their abortion out of state, more than half (56.9%) were non-Hispanic (NH) white, 26.6% were non-Hispanic Black, and 10.2% were Hispanic. Two-fifths (43.9%) resided in the South, one-third (34.3%) resided in the Midwest, 15% resided in the Northeast, and 7% resided in the West. More than one-third (38.2%) had family incomes below 100% of the federal poverty level (FPL), and two-thirds (67.7%) paid out of pocket; only 3% used Medicaid. Profiles of out-of-state abortion patients differed from in-state abortion patients by all characteristics except age. In adjusted analyses, NH Black (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.61-0.96), NH Asian, South Asian, and Asian Pacific Islander (AOR: 0.37; 95% CI: 0.20-0.67), and Hispanic (AOR: 0.46; 95% CI: 0.33-0.64) patients had lower odds of traveling out of state compared with their NH white counterparts. Compared with those paying for their abortion with private insurance, those who paid out of pocket had higher odds of traveling out of state (AOR: 1.75; 95% CI: 1.29-2.37) and those paying with Medicaid had lower odds (AOR: 0.27; 95% CI: 0.15-0.47).
Given the observed differences by race/ethnicity and method of payment for abortion, people of color and those without resources to pay out of pocket may especially benefit from efforts to support access to abortion care via interstate travel as an increasing number of states ban abortion.
随着多个州颁布堕胎禁令,因堕胎而需要前往州外的人数正在增加,罗诉韦德案的推翻。了解在该决定之前前往州外堕胎的患者的特征,可以为未来的研究提供参考,并为改善堕胎机会提供信息。
我们使用盖特马赫研究所管理的 2014 年堕胎患者调查数据,检查了在居住地以外州获得非医院堕胎的患者的流行率和特征。我们检查了选定特征与州外堕胎之间的双变量和多变量关联。
6%的堕胎患者前往州外就医。在前往州外堕胎的患者中,超过一半(56.9%)是非西班牙裔(NH)白人,26.6%是非西班牙裔黑人,10.2%是西班牙裔。五分之二(43.9%)居住在南部,三分之一(34.3%)居住在中西部,15%居住在东北部,7%居住在西部。超过三分之一(38.2%)的家庭收入低于联邦贫困线(FPL)的 100%,有三分之二(67.7%)自掏腰包支付费用;只有 3%使用医疗补助。州外堕胎患者的特征与州内堕胎患者的特征除年龄外均不同。在调整分析中,NH 黑人(调整后的优势比 [AOR]:0.76;95%置信区间 [CI]:0.61-0.96)、NH 亚裔、南亚裔和亚太裔(AOR:0.37;95% CI:0.20-0.67)和西班牙裔(AOR:0.46;95% CI:0.33-0.64)患者前往州外的可能性低于其 NH 白人同行。与使用私人保险支付堕胎费用的人相比,自掏腰包支付费用的人前往州外的可能性更高(AOR:1.75;95% CI:1.29-2.37),而使用医疗补助支付费用的人前往州外的可能性较低(AOR:0.27;95% CI:0.15-0.47)。
鉴于种族/族裔和堕胎支付方式的差异,有色人种和没有自掏腰包支付费用资源的人可能特别受益于通过州际旅行支持堕胎机会的努力,因为越来越多的州禁止堕胎。