• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

决定前后人们对堕胎法的了解和态度。

People's knowledge of and attitudes toward abortion laws before and after the decision.

机构信息

William L. Yarber Endowed Professor in Sexual Health, Department of Applied Health Science, School of Public Health-Bloomington, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.

Assistant Research Scientist, Department of Applied Health Science, School of Public Health-Bloomington, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.

出版信息

Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2023 Dec;31(1):2233794. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2023.2233794.

DOI:10.1080/26410397.2023.2233794
PMID:37565622
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10424603/
Abstract

Although media response to the decision was widespread in the United States, the extent to which people were aware of the Mississippi law leading to the decision, the case, is unclear, as are the resulting effects of the decision on legal abortion. As such, we examined people's awareness of abortion legality prior to and after the decision announcement, as well as the potential implications associated with the decision (i.e. overturning of ). We also examined people's attitudes toward abortion legality, specifically focusing on 15 weeks' gestation to correspond with the Mississippi law that led to . Data were collected across two studies at different times. In Study 1, a 15-minute survey was administered to IPSOS' KnowledgePanel (= 1014) prior to the decision announcement. A shorter version of that survey was administered to a second sample using NORC's AmeriSpeak Omnibus panel (= 1002). Nearly half of that sample (42.2%) completed the survey prior to the decision announcement. People were generally unaware of the Mississippi law, the case, and implications associated with the decision (e.g. overturning ). People generally endorsed abortion being legal at 15 weeks or later, but this varied by circumstance. We did not find meaningful effects of the decision announcement on people's knowledge and attitudes. Our findings suggest that the intense response to the decision from the media and people involved in the abortion movement may not represent the general public's reaction.

摘要

尽管媒体对这一决定的反应在美国广泛传播,但人们对导致这一决定的密西西比州法律、案件的了解程度尚不清楚,该决定对合法堕胎的影响也不清楚。因此,我们调查了人们在决定宣布前后对堕胎合法性的认识,以及与该决定相关的潜在影响(即推翻)。我们还调查了人们对堕胎合法性的态度,特别是关注 15 周妊娠,以对应导致这一决定的密西西比州法律。数据是在两次不同时间的研究中收集的。在研究 1 中,在决定宣布前,IPSOS 的 KnowledgePanel(=1014)进行了一项 15 分钟的调查。NORC 的 AmeriSpeak 综合调查小组(=1002)对第二个样本进行了该调查的简短版本。该样本中有近一半(42.2%)在决定宣布前完成了调查。人们普遍不知道密西西比州法律、案件以及与该决定相关的影响(例如推翻)。人们普遍支持在 15 周或更晚时堕胎合法,但这取决于具体情况。我们没有发现决定宣布对人们的知识和态度产生有意义的影响。我们的研究结果表明,媒体和参与堕胎运动的人对这一决定的强烈反应可能并不代表公众的反应。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f7e/10424603/355d277167fd/ZRHM_A_2233794_F0006_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f7e/10424603/2bde7f8db179/ZRHM_A_2233794_F0001_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f7e/10424603/21c4f3dabe3c/ZRHM_A_2233794_F0002_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f7e/10424603/67d679a3185f/ZRHM_A_2233794_F0003_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f7e/10424603/08eba2148562/ZRHM_A_2233794_F0004_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f7e/10424603/1c6da8ff613d/ZRHM_A_2233794_F0005_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f7e/10424603/355d277167fd/ZRHM_A_2233794_F0006_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f7e/10424603/2bde7f8db179/ZRHM_A_2233794_F0001_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f7e/10424603/21c4f3dabe3c/ZRHM_A_2233794_F0002_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f7e/10424603/67d679a3185f/ZRHM_A_2233794_F0003_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f7e/10424603/08eba2148562/ZRHM_A_2233794_F0004_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f7e/10424603/1c6da8ff613d/ZRHM_A_2233794_F0005_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f7e/10424603/355d277167fd/ZRHM_A_2233794_F0006_OC.jpg

相似文献

1
People's knowledge of and attitudes toward abortion laws before and after the decision.决定前后人们对堕胎法的了解和态度。
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2023 Dec;31(1):2233794. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2023.2233794.
2
Requests for Self-managed Medication Abortion Provided Using Online Telemedicine in 30 US States Before and After the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization Decision.在多布斯诉杰克逊妇女健康组织案裁决前后,美国30个州通过在线远程医疗提供自我管理药物流产的申请情况。
JAMA. 2022 Nov 1;328(17):1768-1770. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.18865.
3
An exploratory examination of attitudes toward illegal abortion in the U.S. through endorsement of various punishments.通过对各种惩罚的支持来探究美国民众对非法堕胎的态度。
Contraception. 2023 May;121:109952. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2023.109952. Epub 2023 Jan 11.
4
Potential Effects of on Civil Commitment Law.对民事收容法的潜在影响。 (你提供的原文中“of”后面似乎缺少具体内容)
Am J Law Med. 2023 Jul;49(2-3):359-373. doi: 10.1017/amj.2023.37. Epub 2024 Feb 12.
5
A national analysis of ED presentations for early pregnancy and complications: Implications for post-Roe America.一项关于急诊就诊早期妊娠和并发症的全国性分析:对后罗伊美国的影响。
Am J Emerg Med. 2023 Aug;70:90-95. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2023.05.011. Epub 2023 May 22.
6
Perceptions of abortion access across the United States prior to the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization decision: Results from a national survey.《多布斯诉杰克逊妇女健康组织案》之前美国对堕胎机会的认知:全国调查结果。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2023 Sep;55(3):153-164. doi: 10.1363/psrh.12238. Epub 2023 Jul 20.
7
Abortion Attitudes and Behavioral Intentions of Obstetrics and Gynecology Residents at Four Midwestern Residency Programs Prior to .中西部四个住院医师培训项目的妇产科住院医师在之前的堕胎态度和行为意图 。 你提供的原文似乎不完整,句子未结束,翻译可能会有些生硬,你可补充完整原文后再次让我翻译。
WMJ. 2024 Jul;123(3):172-176.
8
INTRODUCTION: Securing Reproductive Justice After .引言:保障生殖正义在后......
J Law Med Ethics. 2023;51(3):463-467. doi: 10.1017/jme.2023.88. Epub 2023 Dec 13.
9
Abortion Access for Women in Custody in the Wake of .妇女羁押期间的堕胎机会
Am J Law Med. 2023 Dec;49(4):471-492. doi: 10.1017/amj.2024.4. Epub 2024 Apr 2.
10
A Mixed-Methods Approach to Understanding the Disconnection between Perceptions of Abortion Acceptability and Support for Roe v. Wade among US Adults.一种混合方法,用于理解美国成年人中堕胎可接受性认知与对罗诉韦德案支持之间的脱节。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2023 Aug 1;48(4):649-678. doi: 10.1215/03616878-10449896.

引用本文的文献

1
English- and Spanish-speaking U.S. adults' perceptions of the most common reasons for abortion: a study of open-ended data before and after Dobbs v. Jackson.说英语和西班牙语的美国成年人对堕胎最常见原因的看法:一项关于多布斯诉杰克逊案前后开放式数据的研究。
Reprod Health. 2025 Jul 18;22(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s12978-025-02039-5.
2
Assessing the impact of the decision on abortion attitudes by abortion identity labels: a mixed-methods longitudinal study.通过堕胎身份标签评估该决定对堕胎态度的影响:一项混合方法纵向研究。
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2025 Dec;33(1):2518669. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2025.2518669. Epub 2025 Jul 25.
3

本文引用的文献

1
A Mixed-Methods Approach to Understanding the Disconnection between Perceptions of Abortion Acceptability and Support for Roe v. Wade among US Adults.一种混合方法,用于理解美国成年人中堕胎可接受性认知与对罗诉韦德案支持之间的脱节。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2023 Aug 1;48(4):649-678. doi: 10.1215/03616878-10449896.
2
Passage of abortion ban and women's accurate understanding of abortion legality.堕胎禁令的通过和女性对堕胎合法性的准确理解。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Jul;225(1):63.e1-63.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.02.009. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
3
Same-sex marriage legalization associated with reduced implicit and explicit antigay bias.
Abortion Rights: Perspectives of Academic Scientists in the United States.
堕胎权利:美国学术科学家的观点
Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle). 2024 Sep 4;5(1):602-612. doi: 10.1089/whr.2024.0041. eCollection 2024.
4
The perceived impact of a post-Dobbs landscape on U.S. adolescents and young adults.多布斯案判决后对美国青少年和青年的影响。
Contraception. 2024 Oct;138:110513. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110513. Epub 2024 Jun 13.
同性婚姻合法化与减少隐性和显性反同偏见有关。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Apr 30;116(18):8846-8851. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1806000116. Epub 2019 Apr 15.
4
Coverage of Abortion in Select U.S. Newspapers.美国部分报纸对堕胎的报道。
Womens Health Issues. 2019 Jan-Feb;29(1):80-86. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2018.08.008. Epub 2018 Oct 9.
5
The Effect of a Supreme Court Decision Regarding Gay Marriage on Social Norms and Personal Attitudes.最高法院关于同性婚姻的裁决对社会规范和个人态度的影响。
Psychol Sci. 2017 Sep;28(9):1334-1344. doi: 10.1177/0956797617709594. Epub 2017 Jul 31.
6
Reasons why women have induced abortions: a synthesis of findings from 14 countries.女性进行人工流产的原因:来自14个国家的研究结果综述
Contraception. 2017 Oct;96(4):233-241. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2017.06.014. Epub 2017 Jul 8.
7
Women's Knowledge of and Support for Abortion Restrictions in Texas: Findings from a Statewide Representative Survey.德克萨斯州女性对堕胎限制的了解与支持:一项全州代表性调查的结果
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2016 Dec;48(4):189-197. doi: 10.1363/48e8716. Epub 2016 Apr 15.
8
Are all abortions equal? Should there be exceptions to the criminalization of abortion for rape and incest?所有堕胎情况都一样吗?对于强奸和乱伦导致的堕胎,将其定罪是否应该有例外情况?
J Law Med Ethics. 2015 Spring;43(1):87-104. doi: 10.1111/jlme.12198.
9
Does state-level context matter for individuals' knowledge about abortion, legality and health? Challenging the 'red states v. blue states' hypothesis.州层面的背景信息对个人关于堕胎、合法性和健康的知识有影响吗?挑战“红州对蓝州”假说。
Cult Health Sex. 2015;17(6):733-46. doi: 10.1080/13691058.2014.994230. Epub 2015 Jan 26.
10
Knowledge of Abortion Laws and Services Among Low-Income Women in Three United States Cities.美国三个城市低收入女性对堕胎法律和服务的了解情况
J Immigr Minor Health. 2015 Dec;17(6):1811-8. doi: 10.1007/s10903-014-0147-z.