• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在 之后,非堕胎生殖保健服务获取的早期全国趋势。

Early national trends in non-abortion reproductive care access after .

机构信息

Department of Health Administration and Policy, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, United States.

The Lexington Center IVF Inc, Boston, MA, United States.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2024 Mar 8;12:1309068. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1309068. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2024.1309068
PMID:38525331
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10957616/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

was overturned in 2022. No peer-reviewed evidence exists for the indirect spillover effects of overturning on non-abortion reproductive care access for diverse patient populations.

METHODS

National data were from 2013-2023 HHS Title X Directory, 2013-2020 CDC Artificial Reproductive Technologies (ART) Surveillance and 2021-2023 manual collection, and Guttmacher Institute. Outcome measures included numbers of ART clinics and Title X entities. Title X entities are those that receive federal funds to establish and operate voluntary family planning projects, especially for low-income patients. We reported pre-and post- changes, associations between changes in measures and abortions, and characteristics of changed measures by region and political geography.

RESULTS

Post- America witnessed national declines of 1.03% in ART clinics and 18.34% in Title X entities, and average state decreases of 0.08 ART clinics ( < 0.05) and 18 Title X entities ( < 0.001). State-level ART clinic closures and abortion reductions had little association except for Texas, Oklahoma, Arizona, New York, and California. Plummets in Title X entities and abortions were positively associated: Reducing 100 abortions was associated with defunding two Title X entities ( < 0.05). The South experienced the largest losses of both, while 83.39% of lost Title X entities were in states that voted Republican in the 2020 presidential election, disproportionate to the 49.02% of states that voted Republican and the 42.52% of US population residing in these states.

CONCLUSION

We provide one of the first few evidence of spillover impacts of overturning on non-abortion care access for diverse populations: low-income men and women, single parents by choice, and biologically and socially infertile patients. Early evidence warns of worsening challenges of inequities and calls for immediate policy actions.

摘要

背景

2022 年,推翻了这一观点。目前尚无同行评议的证据表明,推翻该观点会对不同患者群体的非堕胎生殖保健服务产生间接溢出效应。

方法

国家数据来自 2013-2023 年 HHS Title X 目录、2013-2020 年 CDC 人工生殖技术(ART)监测以及 2021-2023 年的人工收集和古特马赫研究所。结果测量包括 ART 诊所和 Title X 实体的数量。Title X 实体是指那些获得联邦资金以建立和运营自愿计划生育项目的实体,特别是为低收入患者提供服务。我们报告了变化前后的情况、变化前后措施与堕胎之间的关联,以及按地区和政治地理划分的变化措施的特征。

结果

在美国之后,全国的 ART 诊所数量减少了 1.03%,Title X 实体数量减少了 18.34%,平均每个州的 ART 诊所减少了 0.08 个( < 0.05),Title X 实体减少了 18 个( < 0.001)。除了德克萨斯州、俄克拉荷马州、亚利桑那州、纽约州和加利福尼亚州外,州一级的 ART 诊所关闭和堕胎减少之间几乎没有关联。Title X 实体和堕胎数量的急剧下降呈正相关:减少 100 例堕胎与取消两个 Title X 实体的资金( < 0.05)有关。南部地区的损失最大,而失去的 100 个 Title X 实体中有 83.39%位于 2020 年总统选举中投票给共和党的州,这与投票给共和党的州的 49.02%不成比例,也与居住在这些州的 42.52%的美国人口不成比例。

结论

我们提供了推翻该观点对不同人群的非堕胎护理服务的间接溢出效应的首批证据之一:低收入的男性和女性、有选择的单身父母以及生物和社会上不育的患者。早期的证据警告说,不平等现象的挑战正在恶化,并呼吁立即采取政策行动。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec28/10957616/088addf82b36/fpubh-12-1309068-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec28/10957616/ed691c67ee9e/fpubh-12-1309068-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec28/10957616/e43f828bb33d/fpubh-12-1309068-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec28/10957616/088addf82b36/fpubh-12-1309068-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec28/10957616/ed691c67ee9e/fpubh-12-1309068-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec28/10957616/e43f828bb33d/fpubh-12-1309068-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec28/10957616/088addf82b36/fpubh-12-1309068-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Early national trends in non-abortion reproductive care access after .在 之后,非堕胎生殖保健服务获取的早期全国趋势。
Front Public Health. 2024 Mar 8;12:1309068. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1309068. eCollection 2024.
2
Health Equity in a Post 'Roe Versus Wade' America.“罗诉韦德案”裁决后美国的健康公平性
Cureus. 2022 Dec 1;14(12):e32100. doi: 10.7759/cureus.32100. eCollection 2022 Dec.
3
Beyond Roe, after Casey: the present and future of a "fundamental" right.罗诉韦德案之后,凯西案之后:一项“基本”权利的现状与未来。
Womens Health Issues. 1993 Fall;3(3):162-70. doi: 10.1016/s1049-3867(05)80251-8.
4
Projected Implications of Overturning Roe v Wade on Abortion Training in U.S. Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Programs.罗诉韦德案被推翻对美国妇产科住院医师培训中堕胎培训的预计影响。
Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Aug 1;140(2):146-149. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004832. Epub 2022 Apr 27.
5
Overturning Roe v. Wade: consequences for midlife women's health and well-being.推翻罗诉韦德案:对中年女性健康与福祉的影响
Womens Midlife Health. 2023 Jan 6;9(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s40695-022-00085-8.
6
Abortion in America: 12 years after Roe v. Wade.美国的堕胎问题:罗诉韦德案12年后
Popul Today. 1985 Nov;13(11):2, 8-9.
7
Clinton repeals antiabortion policies as activists map out new strategies.随着活动人士制定新策略,克林顿废除了反堕胎政策。
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst. 1993 Feb 9(3):1-2.
8
: Navigating the New Quagmire and Its Impacts on Abortion and Reproductive Health Care.: 论新困境及其对堕胎和生殖保健的影响。
Health Educ Behav. 2022 Dec;49(6):924-928. doi: 10.1177/10901981221125430. Epub 2022 Sep 29.
9
U.S. abortion policy since Roe v. Wade.自罗诉韦德案以来的美国堕胎政策。
Am J Gynecol Health. 1993 Jul-Aug;7(4):98-106.
10
A national analysis of ED presentations for early pregnancy and complications: Implications for post-Roe America.一项关于急诊就诊早期妊娠和并发症的全国性分析:对后罗伊美国的影响。
Am J Emerg Med. 2023 Aug;70:90-95. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2023.05.011. Epub 2023 May 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Experiences of Gender and Racial/Ethnic Discrimination in Sexual Healthcare Among Transgender and Nonbinary Young Adults of Color.有色人种跨性别和非二元性别的年轻成年人在性健康护理中遭遇性别及种族/民族歧视的经历。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2025 Jun;57(2):231-240. doi: 10.1111/psrh.70017. Epub 2025 Jun 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Estimated Travel Time and Spatial Access to Abortion Facilities in the US Before and After the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Decision.美国多布斯诉杰克逊妇女健康组织案前后的堕胎设施出行时间估计和空间可达性。
JAMA. 2022 Nov 22;328(20):2041-2047. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.20424.
2
The impact of policy changes from the perspective of providers of family planning care in the US: results from a qualitative study.从美国计划生育服务提供者的角度看政策变化的影响:一项定性研究的结果。
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2022 Dec;30(1):2089322. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2022.2089322.
3
What Overturning Roe v Wade May Mean for Assisted Reproductive Technologies in the US.
推翻罗诉韦德案对美国辅助生殖技术可能意味着什么。
JAMA. 2022 Jul 5;328(1):15-16. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.10163.
4
Navigating Loss of Abortion Services - A Large Academic Medical Center Prepares for the Overturn of .应对堕胎服务的缺失——一家大型学术医疗中心为(某项法案)的推翻做准备 。 (注:原文最后“of”后面内容缺失,翻译只能根据现有内容尽量完整表达)
N Engl J Med. 2022 Jun 2;386(22):2061-2064. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2206246. Epub 2022 May 11.
5
Title X Improved Access To Most Effective And Moderately Effective Contraception In US Safety-Net Clinics, 2016-18.标题 X:2016-2018 年,美国安全网诊所中最有效和中度有效的避孕措施的可及性得到改善。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2022 Apr;41(4):497-506. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2021.01483.
6
Restrictive State Abortion Bans - A Reproductive Injustice.限制性州堕胎禁令——一种生殖不公正现象。
N Engl J Med. 2022 Mar 31;386(13):1197-1199. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2119364. Epub 2022 Mar 26.
7
The changing world of IVF: the pros and cons of new business models offering assisted reproductive technologies.体外受精领域的变革:新商业模式提供辅助生殖技术的利弊。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2022 Feb;39(2):305-313. doi: 10.1007/s10815-022-02399-y. Epub 2022 Jan 20.
8
"We have to respect that option": The abortion aversion complex in safety-net healthcare organizations.“我们必须尊重这一选择”:安全网医疗组织中的堕胎回避情结。
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Dec;291:114468. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114468. Epub 2021 Oct 9.
9
Decline in sperm count and motility in young adult men from 2003 to 2013: observations from a U.S. sperm bank.2003年至2013年美国年轻成年男性精子数量和活力的下降:来自一家精子库的观察结果。
Andrology. 2016 Mar;4(2):270-6. doi: 10.1111/andr.12149. Epub 2016 Jan 20.