Department of Public Health Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USA.
Department of Psychology, College of Behavioral, Social, and Health Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USA.
Int J Drug Policy. 2024 Jan;123:104288. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2023.104288. Epub 2023 Dec 15.
Objective adherence measures, such as electronic blister pack (BP), for direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) for hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment have high accuracy, but their use is limited in real practice settings. We examined the association of self-reported adherence using a visual analogue scale (VAS) with objective BP adherence and sustained virologic response (SVR) among people who inject drugs.
We conducted secondary analyses using a subset of participants (N = 493) from the per-protocol sample of the HERO study, a pragmatic randomized trial of HCV treatment interventions that used both VAS and BP to measure adherence to a 12-week sofosbuvir/velpatasvir DAA regimen. Multivariable mixed-effects regression models tested the association of self-report adherence level with longitudinal weekly objective adherence. Multivariable logistic regression tested the association of self-report adherence with SVR.
The average VAS and BP adherences were 95.1 % (SD = 8.9 %) and 76.0 % (16.0 %), respectively, and the proportion of the participants achieving SVR was 92.9 %. The estimated adjusted mean objective adherence was significantly different (-16 %; 95 % CI: -22 %, -11 %, p < .001) between participants with 100 % and <80 % VAS adherence. The likelihood of SVR was significantly lower for those with <80 % VAS adherence [adjusted OR = 0.07; 95 % CI: 0.02, 0.24; p < .001] compared to those with 100 %.
Self-reported adherence overestimated objective adherence. However, higher self-report adherence was significantly associated with higher objective adherence. Also, self-reported adherence ≥80 % was significantly associated with SVR. Thus, the self-report measure has utility as a monitoring tool for adherence during DAA treatment.
用于丙型肝炎病毒 (HCV) 治疗的直接作用抗病毒药物 (DAA) 的客观依从性措施,如电子药板 (BP),具有很高的准确性,但在实际实践环境中的使用受到限制。我们检查了使用视觉模拟量表 (VAS) 报告的自我报告依从性与注射毒品者的客观 BP 依从性和持续病毒学应答 (SVR) 之间的关联。
我们使用 HERO 研究方案样本中的参与者子集(N=493)进行了二次分析,该研究是一项 HCV 治疗干预的实用随机试验,使用 VAS 和 BP 来衡量对 12 周索非布韦/维帕他韦 DAA 方案的依从性。多变量混合效应回归模型测试了自我报告依从性水平与纵向每周客观依从性的关联。多变量逻辑回归测试了自我报告依从性与 SVR 的关联。
平均 VAS 和 BP 依从率分别为 95.1%(SD=8.9%)和 76.0%(16.0%),参与者实现 SVR 的比例为 92.9%。估计的调整后平均客观依从性在 VAS 依从性为 100%和 <80%的参与者之间存在显著差异(-16%;95%CI:-22%,-11%,p<0.001)。VAS 依从性 <80%的患者获得 SVR 的可能性明显较低[调整后的 OR=0.07;95%CI:0.02,0.24;p<0.001]与 VAS 依从性为 100%的患者相比。
自我报告的依从性高估了客观依从性。然而,较高的自我报告依从性与较高的客观依从性显著相关。此外,自我报告的依从性≥80%与 SVR 显著相关。因此,自我报告测量作为 DAA 治疗期间依从性的监测工具具有一定的效用。