• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人类与机器人对话中的问题与失败:研讨会报告

Working with roubles and failures in conversation between humans and robots: workshop report.

作者信息

Förster Frank, Romeo Marta, Holthaus Patrick, Wood Luke J, Dondrup Christian, Fischer Joel E, Liza Farhana Ferdousi, Kaszuba Sara, Hough Julian, Nesset Birthe, Hernández García Daniel, Kontogiorgos Dimosthenis, Williams Jennifer, Özkan Elif Ecem, Barnard Pepita, Berumen Gustavo, Price Dominic, Cobb Sue, Wiltschko Martina, Tisserand Lucien, Porcheron Martin, Giuliani Manuel, Skantze Gabriel, Healey Patrick G T, Papaioannou Ioannis, Gkatzia Dimitra, Albert Saul, Huang Guanyu, Maraev Vladislav, Kapetanios Epaminondas

机构信息

Department of Computer Science, School of Physics, Engineering and Computer Science, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom.

Department of Computer Science, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Front Robot AI. 2023 Dec 1;10:1202306. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2023.1202306. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/frobt.2023.1202306
PMID:38106544
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10722147/
Abstract

This paper summarizes the structure and findings from the first . The workshop was organized to bring together a small, interdisciplinary group of researchers working on miscommunication from two complementary perspectives. One group of technology-oriented researchers was made up of roboticists, Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) researchers and dialogue system experts. The second group involved experts from conversation analysis, cognitive science, and linguistics. Uniting both groups of researchers is the belief that communication failures between humans and machines need to be taken seriously and that a systematic analysis of such failures may open fruitful avenues in research beyond current practices to improve such systems, including both speech-centric and multimodal interfaces. This workshop represents a starting point for this endeavour. The aim of the workshop was threefold: Firstly, to establish an interdisciplinary network of researchers that share a common interest in investigating communicative failures with a particular view towards robotic speech interfaces; secondly, to gain a partial overview of the "failure landscape" as experienced by roboticists and HRI researchers; and thirdly, to determine the potential for creating a robotic benchmark scenario for testing future speech interfaces with respect to the identified failures. The present article summarizes both the "failure landscape" surveyed during the workshop as well as the outcomes of the attempt to define a benchmark scenario.

摘要

本文总结了首次研讨会的架构和成果。此次研讨会旨在召集一小群从两个互补视角研究沟通失误问题的跨学科研究人员。其中一组以技术为导向的研究人员包括机器人专家、人机交互(HRI)研究人员和对话系统专家。第二组则有来自会话分析、认知科学和语言学领域的专家。两组研究人员的共同信念是,人机之间的沟通失败问题需要得到重视,并且对这类失败进行系统分析可能会为超越当前实践以改进此类系统(包括以语音为中心的和多模态界面)的研究开辟富有成果的途径。本次研讨会是这一努力的起点。研讨会的目标有三个:第一,建立一个跨学科研究人员网络,他们对研究沟通失败问题有着共同兴趣,尤其关注机器人语音界面;第二,对机器人专家和人机交互研究人员所经历的“失败图景”有一个部分性的总体认识;第三,确定针对已识别的失败情况创建一个用于测试未来语音界面的机器人基准场景的可能性。本文总结了研讨会期间所调查的“失败图景”以及定义基准场景的尝试结果。

相似文献

1
Working with roubles and failures in conversation between humans and robots: workshop report.人类与机器人对话中的问题与失败:研讨会报告
Front Robot AI. 2023 Dec 1;10:1202306. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2023.1202306. eCollection 2023.
2
Macromolecular crowding: chemistry and physics meet biology (Ascona, Switzerland, 10-14 June 2012).大分子拥挤现象:化学与物理邂逅生物学(瑞士阿斯科纳,2012年6月10日至14日)
Phys Biol. 2013 Aug;10(4):040301. doi: 10.1088/1478-3975/10/4/040301. Epub 2013 Aug 2.
3
Art, Design and Communication Theory in Creating the Communicative Social Robot 'Haru'.创作社交型通信机器人“春”过程中的艺术、设计与传播理论
Front Robot AI. 2021 Mar 1;8:577107. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2021.577107. eCollection 2021.
4
Understanding and Resolving Failures in Human-Robot Interaction: Literature Review and Model Development.理解与解决人机交互中的故障:文献综述与模型开发
Front Psychol. 2018 Jun 15;9:861. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00861. eCollection 2018.
5
Modelling Multimodal Dialogues for Social Robots Using Communicative Acts.使用交际行为对社交机器人进行多模态对话建模。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Jun 18;20(12):3440. doi: 10.3390/s20123440.
6
Recent advancements in multimodal human-robot interaction.多模态人机交互的最新进展。
Front Neurorobot. 2023 May 11;17:1084000. doi: 10.3389/fnbot.2023.1084000. eCollection 2023.
7
Lessons Learned About Designing and Conducting Studies From HRI Experts.从人机交互研究专家那里学到的关于设计和开展研究的经验教训。
Front Robot AI. 2022 Jan 28;8:772141. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2021.772141. eCollection 2021.
8
Companion robots for older people: importance of user-centred design demonstrated through observations and focus groups comparing preferences of older people and roboticists in South West England.陪伴老年人的机器人:通过观察和焦点小组比较英格兰西南部老年人和机器人专家的偏好,展示了以用户为中心的设计的重要性。
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 26;9(9):e032468. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032468.
9
A Meta-Analysis on Remote HRI and In-Person HRI: What Is a Socially Assistive Robot to Do?远程人机交互与当面人机交互的元分析:社交型机器人该做什么?
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Sep 21;22(19):7155. doi: 10.3390/s22197155.
10
A Systematic Review of Human and Robot Personality in Health Care Human-Robot Interaction.医疗保健人机交互中人类与机器人个性的系统评价
Front Robot AI. 2021 Sep 17;8:748246. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2021.748246. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Editorial: Failures and repairs in human-robot communication.社论:人机通信中的故障与修复
Front Robot AI. 2025 Mar 10;12:1583911. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2025.1583911. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Who Is Responsible for a Dialogue Breakdown? An Error Recovery Strategy That Promotes Cooperative Intentions From Humans by Mutual Attribution of Responsibility in Human-Robot Dialogues.谁应对对话中断负责?一种通过在人机对话中相互归因责任来促进人类合作意图的错误恢复策略。
Front Robot AI. 2019 Apr 24;6:29. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2019.00029. eCollection 2019.
2
The body talks: Sensorimotor communication and its brain and kinematic signatures.身体的语言:感觉运动通讯及其大脑和运动学特征。
Phys Life Rev. 2019 Mar;28:1-21. doi: 10.1016/j.plrev.2018.06.014. Epub 2018 Jun 30.
3
Understanding and Resolving Failures in Human-Robot Interaction: Literature Review and Model Development.理解与解决人机交互中的故障:文献综述与模型开发
Front Psychol. 2018 Jun 15;9:861. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00861. eCollection 2018.
4
Editors' Introduction: Miscommunication.编者按:误解
Top Cogn Sci. 2018 Apr;10(2):264-278. doi: 10.1111/tops.12340.
5
Repair: The Interface Between Interaction and Cognition.修复:交互与认知的接口。
Top Cogn Sci. 2018 Apr;10(2):279-313. doi: 10.1111/tops.12339.
6
Running Repairs: Coordinating Meaning in Dialogue.运行修复:对话中的协调意义。
Top Cogn Sci. 2018 Apr;10(2):367-388. doi: 10.1111/tops.12336. Epub 2018 Apr 24.
7
Universal Principles in the Repair of Communication Problems.修复沟通问题的通用原则。
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 16;10(9):e0136100. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136100. eCollection 2015.
8
Systematic analysis of video data from different human-robot interaction studies: a categorization of social signals during error situations.对来自不同人机交互研究的视频数据进行系统分析:错误情况下社交信号的分类。
Front Psychol. 2015 Jul 8;6:931. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00931. eCollection 2015.
9
Is "huh?" a universal word? Conversational infrastructure and the convergent evolution of linguistic items.“嗯?”是一个通用词吗?会话结构与语言项的趋同进化
PLoS One. 2013 Nov 8;8(11):e78273. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078273. eCollection 2013.
10
A meta-analysis of factors affecting trust in human-robot interaction.元分析影响人机交互信任的因素。
Hum Factors. 2011 Oct;53(5):517-27. doi: 10.1177/0018720811417254.