Schaefer Eliana, Lawson Jonathan, Ibrahim Tamara, Yohe Gabriel, Zhang Gongliang, Giladi Aviram M
The Curtis National Hand Center, MedStar Union Memorial Hospital, Baltimore, MD.
Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC.
J Hand Surg Glob Online. 2023 Aug 22;5(6):763-767. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2023.07.010. eCollection 2023 Nov.
We sought to investigate the role of prophylactic antibiotics for distal fingertip crush injury or transphalangeal amputation treated outside of an operating room and better understand the factors that contribute to antibiotic-prescribing decisions. We hypothesized that prophylactic antibiotics do not meaningfully reduce the incidence of infection and that antibiotics are prescribed in a predictable way.
This is a retrospective review of all patients treated in a MedStar-affiliated emergency department or urgent care for nonsurgical distal fingertip trauma in 2019. Patient demographics, comorbidities, injury characteristics, interventions, and follow-up details were recorded. Exclusion criteria included signs of infection at the time of presentation, minor injuries not requiring intervention, bite wounds, one-time intravenous antibiotic administration without oral course, and surgical intervention. Outcomes included infection and interventions at follow-up. Chi-square analysis was performed, comparing antibiotic and no-antibiotic groups. A stepwise binomial regression was used to evaluate for variables predictive of antibiotic prescription.
We identified eight infections in 323 patients included in the study (2.5% incidence of infection). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of infection between patients treated with antibiotics (2.7%) and those who did not receive antibiotics (2.2%). However, due to the low incidence of infections, we were likely underpowered for this analysis. We also created a model to predict antibiotic prescribing, which achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.86 ( < .0001) based on age, bleeding disorders, depressive disorders, open wound status, amputation, fractures, and encounter type.
The low incidence of infection (2.5%) and lack of a meaningful difference between the groups call into question prophylactic antibiotic prescribing after these distal fingertip injuries. Our model does predict provider prescribing habits, identifying areas for potential practice pattern change.
TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic III.
我们试图研究预防性抗生素在手术室以外治疗的远端指尖挤压伤或经指骨截肢中的作用,并更好地了解促成抗生素处方决策的因素。我们假设预防性抗生素不会显著降低感染发生率,且抗生素的处方开具具有可预测性。
这是一项对2019年在MedStar附属急诊科或紧急护理中心接受非手术性远端指尖创伤治疗的所有患者的回顾性研究。记录了患者的人口统计学信息、合并症、损伤特征、干预措施和随访细节。排除标准包括就诊时的感染迹象、无需干预的轻伤、咬伤、未进行口服疗程的一次性静脉抗生素给药以及手术干预。结局指标包括随访时的感染情况和干预措施。进行卡方分析,比较抗生素组和非抗生素组。采用逐步二项式回归评估预测抗生素处方的变量。
我们在纳入研究的323例患者中发现了8例感染(感染发生率为2.5%)。接受抗生素治疗的患者(2.7%)和未接受抗生素治疗的患者(2.2%)之间的感染发生率无统计学显著差异。然而,由于感染发生率较低,我们可能没有足够的检验效能进行此分析。我们还创建了一个预测抗生素处方的模型,该模型基于年龄、出血性疾病、抑郁症、开放性伤口状态、截肢、骨折和就诊类型,在受试者工作特征曲线下面积为0.86(P < .0001)。
感染发生率较低(2.5%)以及两组之间缺乏显著差异,这让人对这些远端指尖损伤后预防性抗生素的处方开具产生质疑。我们的模型确实能够预测医生的处方习惯,识别出潜在的实践模式改变领域。
研究类型/证据水平:治疗性III级。