Jhaveri Komal, O'Shaughnessy Joyce, Fasching Peter A, Tolaney Sara M, Yardley Denise A, Sharma Vikash Kumar, Biswas Chandroday, Thuerigen Astrid, Pathak Purnima, Rugo Hope S
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Texas Oncology-Baylor University Medical Center and the US Oncology Research Network, Dallas, TX, USA.
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2023 Dec 14;15:17588359231216095. doi: 10.1177/17588359231216095. eCollection 2023.
Current standard-of-care first-line treatment of patients with hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC) is cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) + endocrine therapy. In the MONALEESA-2 trial, first-line ribociclib + letrozole demonstrated statistically significant overall survival (OS) benefit placebo + letrozole in postmenopausal patients with HR+/HER2- ABC. In the PALOMA-2 trial, first-line palbociclib + letrozole did not show OS benefit placebo + letrozole in a similar patient population. Understanding OS outcomes in the respective trials is critical for treatment decisions; however, there are no head-to-head clinical trial data comparing ribociclib and palbociclib.
To conduct a matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) to compare progression-free survival (PFS) and OS of first-line ribociclib + letrozole versus palbociclib + letrozole in postmenopausal patients with HR+/HER2- ABC.
Letrozole-anchored MAIC using individual patient data from MONALEESA-2 and published summary data from PALOMA-2.
Using individual data, patients from MONALEESA-2 who matched inclusion criteria from PALOMA-2 were selected, and weighting was conducted to ensure baseline characteristics were similar to those in published aggregated data from PALOMA-2. The Bucher method was used to generate corresponding hazard ratios (HRs).
The final effective sample size compared = 150 (ribociclib) and = 112 (placebo) MONALEESA-2 patients with = 444 (palbociclib) and = 222 (placebo) PALOMA-2 patients. After matching and weighting, patient characteristics were well balanced. MAIC analysis showed a numerical PFS benefit [HR, 0.80; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.58-1.11; = 0.187] and significant OS benefit (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.48-0.96; = 0.031) with ribociclib + letrozole versus palbociclib + letrozole.
Results of this cross-trial MAIC analysis showed a numerical PFS benefit and significantly greater OS benefit with first-line ribociclib + letrozole palbociclib + letrozole. These results support letrozole + ribociclib as the preferred first-line CDK4/6i for postmenopausal patients with HR+/HER2- ABC.
NCT01958021; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01958021 (MONALEESA-2) and NCT01740427; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01740427 (PALOMA-2).
目前,激素受体阳性/人表皮生长因子受体2阴性(HR+/HER2-)晚期乳腺癌(ABC)患者的标准一线治疗方案是细胞周期蛋白依赖性激酶4/6抑制剂(CDK4/6i)+内分泌治疗。在MONALEESA-2试验中,一线使用瑞博西尼+来曲唑治疗绝经后HR+/HER2- ABC患者,与安慰剂+来曲唑相比,总生存期(OS)有统计学意义的显著获益。在PALOMA-2试验中,一线使用哌柏西利+来曲唑治疗类似患者群体,与安慰剂+来曲唑相比,未显示出OS获益。了解各试验中的OS结果对于治疗决策至关重要;然而,尚无比较瑞博西尼和哌柏西利的直接头对头临床试验数据。
进行匹配调整间接比较(MAIC),以比较一线使用瑞博西尼+来曲唑与哌柏西利+来曲唑治疗绝经后HR+/HER2- ABC患者的无进展生存期(PFS)和OS。
采用以来曲唑为锚定的MAIC,使用来自MONALEESA-2的个体患者数据和来自PALOMA-2已发表的汇总数据。
利用个体数据,从MONALEESA-2中选择符合PALOMA-2纳入标准的患者,并进行加权处理,以确保基线特征与PALOMA-2已发表的汇总数据中的特征相似。采用布彻方法生成相应的风险比(HR)。
最终有效样本量比较了150例(瑞博西尼)和112例(安慰剂)MONALEESA-2患者与444例(哌柏西利)和222例(安慰剂)PALOMA-2患者。经过匹配和加权后,患者特征得到了良好平衡。MAIC分析显示,与哌柏西利+来曲唑相比,瑞博西尼+来曲唑在数值上有PFS获益[HR,0.80;95%置信区间(CI),0.58 - 1.11;P = 0.187],且有显著的OS获益(HR,0.68;95% CI, 0.48 - 0.96;P = 0.031)。
这项跨试验MAIC分析的结果显示,与哌柏西利+来曲唑相比,一线使用瑞博西尼+来曲唑在数值上有PFS获益且OS获益显著更大。这些结果支持来曲唑+瑞博西尼作为绝经后HR+/HER2- ABC患者首选的一线CDK4/6i。