• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

绿色协议绩效评估的多标准评估框架。

Multi-criteria assessment framework for evaluation of Green Deal performance.

机构信息

Graduate School, Kayseri University, Kayseri, Turkey.

Department of Industrial Engineering, Kayseri University, Kayseri, Turkey.

出版信息

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Jan;31(3):4686-4704. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-31370-2. Epub 2023 Dec 18.

DOI:10.1007/s11356-023-31370-2
PMID:38108985
Abstract

The European Green Deal (EGD) is a long-term and important policy to combat climate change. It contains comprehensive regulations that concern the European continent beyond individuals, companies, and cities. Moreover, achieving environmental sustainability depends on the whole world taking responsibility and concrete steps quickly. Although successful and rapid change requires collective effort and high performance across all topics, involving all countries, communities, and sectors, leaving no one behind, since the economic conditions and infrastructures of countries are different, the process of adaptation to green transformation varies. In this study, the multi-criteria decision-making approach has been used to evaluate the performance of the EU member states in terms of many different criteria under the protecting, reducing, and enabling dimensions in an integrated and comprehensive manner. In this context, the data of the EU member states obtained from Eurostat on 3 main and 15 sub-criteria were used, criterion weights were determined by the MEREC method, and then the EGD performances of the countries were revealed by the MAIRCA method. According to the results, "the primary energy consumption" and "freight transport by mode" were selected as the most significant criteria in terms of EGD compliance performance. As a result of the evaluation of the performances of the alternatives, the Netherlands had the best EGD performance which was followed by Sweden while Ireland had the worst ranking and Cyprus was the other underperforming member. Comparative analyses were conducted with the aim of testing the consistency of the proposed methodology.

摘要

《欧洲绿色协议》(EGD)是应对气候变化的一项长期而重要的政策。它包含了对欧洲大陆的全面规定,不仅涉及个人、公司和城市,还涵盖了更广泛的范围。此外,实现环境可持续性需要全世界迅速承担责任并采取具体行动。尽管成功和快速变革需要所有主题的集体努力和卓越表现,涉及所有国家、社区和部门,不落下任何一个,但由于各国的经济条件和基础设施不同,适应绿色转型的过程也有所不同。在这项研究中,采用多准则决策方法,以综合全面的方式,从保护、减少和赋能三个维度,评估欧盟成员国在许多不同标准下的表现。在此背景下,使用了欧盟统计局提供的欧盟成员国在三个主要标准和 15 个子标准方面的数据,通过 MEREC 方法确定了标准权重,然后通过 MAIRCA 方法揭示了各国的 EGD 表现。结果表明,“一次能源消耗”和“各种运输方式的货运量”是与 EGD 合规表现最相关的关键标准。通过对替代方案的表现进行评估,荷兰在 EGD 表现方面表现最佳,其次是瑞典,而爱尔兰表现最差,塞浦路斯则是表现较差的成员国之一。进行了比较分析,目的是测试所提出方法的一致性。

相似文献

1
Multi-criteria assessment framework for evaluation of Green Deal performance.绿色协议绩效评估的多标准评估框架。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Jan;31(3):4686-4704. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-31370-2. Epub 2023 Dec 18.
2
The 2023 Latin America report of the Countdown on health and climate change: the imperative for health-centred climate-resilient development.《2023年健康与气候变化倒计时拉丁美洲报告:以健康为中心的气候适应型发展的必要性》
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2024 Apr 23;33:100746. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2024.100746. eCollection 2024 May.
3
Building sustainability assessment: A comparison between ITACA, DGNB, HQE and SBTool alignment with the European Green Deal.建筑可持续性评估:ITACA、DGNB、HQE和SBTool与欧洲绿色协议的对比
Heliyon. 2024 Jul 10;10(14):e34478. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34478. eCollection 2024 Jul 30.
4
Assessment of agri-environmental situation in selected EU countries: a multi-criteria decision-making approach for sustainable agricultural development.评估选定欧盟国家的农业环境状况:可持续农业发展的多准则决策方法。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Apr;29(17):25556-25567. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-17655-4. Epub 2021 Nov 30.
5
A Comparative Analysis of Bioeconomy Development in European Union Countries.欧盟国家生物经济发展的比较分析。
Environ Manage. 2023 Feb;71(2):215-233. doi: 10.1007/s00267-022-01751-3. Epub 2022 Dec 1.
6
Urban health: an example of a "health in all policies" approach in the context of SDGs implementation.城市健康:在实现可持续发展目标背景下“所有政策促进健康”方法的一个范例。
Global Health. 2019 Dec 18;15(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s12992-019-0529-z.
7
Small class sizes for improving student achievement in primary and secondary schools: a systematic review.小班教学对提高中小学学生成绩的影响:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 11;14(1):1-107. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.10. eCollection 2018.
8
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
9
Underground Mine Safety and Health: A Hybrid MEREC-CoCoSo System for the Selection of Best Sensor.地下矿山安全与健康:一种混合 MEREC-CoCoSo 系统,用于选择最佳传感器。
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Feb 17;24(4):1285. doi: 10.3390/s24041285.
10
Strengthening the evidence-base of integrated care for people with multi-morbidity in Europe using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA).运用多标准决策分析(MCDA)加强欧洲多病共存患者综合护理的证据基础。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jul 24;18(1):576. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3367-4.