Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Centre for Surgery, Centre for Obesity and Metabolic Surgery, Medical Centre, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Strasse 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Obes Surg. 2024 Feb;34(2):310-317. doi: 10.1007/s11695-023-06982-9. Epub 2023 Dec 18.
Banded sleeve gastrectomy (BSG) has been shown to enable better weight loss than non-banded sleeve gastrectomy (SG) in retrospective analyses. These findings were supported by two randomized controlled trials (RCT). However, to date, mid-term prospective data is not available.
We invited all 94 patients of an RCT comparing banded to non-banded sleeve gastrectomy at 3 years (DRKS00007729) for a 5-year follow-up visit. Eighty-two patients (BSG n = 42; SG n = 40) came for evaluation. Outcome measures were identical with the RCT to allow longitudinal comparison. Data analysis was descriptive and focused on biometric data, development of comorbidities, mid-term complications, quality of life, and type of body contouring surgery (BCS).
The per-protocol analysis revealed a treatment difference of 9% (CI - 1.5 to 19.6) excess weight loss (EWL). Total weight loss (TWL) was 27.4% (CI 23.5-31.3) after SG and 31.6% (CI 27.3-35.5) after BSG. Twenty percent of patients after SG and 11.9% following BSG had been converted to a gastric bypass. Type 2 diabetes went into remission in most patients (SG 66.7% vs. BSG 63.6%). Antihypertensive medication was stopped or reduced in 81.3% after SG and 80% after BSG. Reflux symptoms were similar in both groups (symptoms [Formula: see text] 1/ week: SG 28.2% vs. BSG 26.8%). Frequency of postprandial regurgitation was higher after BSG (SG 23% vs. BSG 59%). Forty percent of patients had undergone BCS at time of follow-up.
Five-year weight loss after BSG was 9% EWL and 4.2% TWL higher compared to SG. The main added morbidity following BSG was postprandial regurgitation.
带袖套胃切除术(BSG)在回顾性分析中显示比非带袖套胃切除术(SG)能更好地减轻体重。这一发现得到了两项随机对照试验(RCT)的支持。然而,迄今为止,中期前瞻性数据尚不可用。
我们邀请了在比较带袖套和非带袖套胃切除术的 3 年 RCT(DRKS00007729)中的 94 名患者进行 5 年随访。82 名患者(BSG 组 n=42;SG 组 n=40)接受了评估。结果测量与 RCT 相同,以便进行纵向比较。数据分析是描述性的,重点是生物统计学数据、合并症的发展、中期并发症、生活质量以及身体整形手术(BCS)的类型。
意向治疗分析显示,BSG 组的额外体重减轻(EWL)为 9%(CI-1.5 至 19.6)。SG 组的总体重减轻(TWL)为 27.4%(CI 23.5-31.3),BSG 组为 31.6%(CI 27.3-35.5)。SG 组有 20%的患者和 BSG 组有 11.9%的患者转为胃旁路术。大多数患者的 2 型糖尿病进入缓解期(SG 组 66.7%,BSG 组 63.6%)。SG 组有 81.3%的患者停止或减少了降压药物,BSG 组有 80%的患者停止或减少了降压药物。两组的反流症状相似(每周症状[Formula: see text]1/次:SG 组 28.2%,BSG 组 26.8%)。BSG 组餐后反流的频率更高(SG 组 23%,BSG 组 59%)。40%的患者在随访时接受了 BCS。
BSG 后 5 年的体重减轻量为 EWL 增加 9%,TWL 增加 4.2%,高于 SG。BSG 后主要的附加发病率是餐后反流。