• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胃旁路术、袖状胃切除术或单吻合口胃旁路术?随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, sleeve gastrectomy, or one-anastomosis gastric bypass? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials.

机构信息

Division of Digestive Surgery, University Hospitals of Geneva, Genève 14, Switzerland.

出版信息

Obesity (Silver Spring). 2022 Mar;30(3):614-627. doi: 10.1002/oby.23338. Epub 2022 Feb 8.

DOI:10.1002/oby.23338
PMID:35137548
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9303972/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine which bariatric procedure allows patients to obtain the best weight-loss outcomes and a remission of type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

Databases were searched for randomized-controlled trials comparing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) with sleeve gastrectomy (SG) or one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB). The mean difference (MD) or the relative risk was determined.

RESULTS

Twenty-five randomized-controlled trials were analyzed. Excess weight loss (EWL, percentage) was greater for RYGB patients at 3 years (MD: 11.93, p < 0.00001) and 5 years (MD: 13.11, p = 0.0004). Higher excess BMI loss (percentage) was found in RYGB at 1 year (MD: 11.66, p = 0.01). Total weight loss (percentage) was greater for RYGB patients after 3 months (MD: 2.41, p = 0.02), 6 months (MD: 3.83, p < 0.00001), 1 year (MD: 6.35, p < 0.00001), and 5 years (MD: 3.90, p = 0.005). No difference in terms of remission of type 2 diabetes was seen between RYGB and SG. EWL was significantly more important after OAGB than after RYGB after 1 year (MD: -10.82, p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

RYGB is more efficient than SG in the midterm. OAGB offers greater EWL than RYGB after 1 year, but further evidence is needed to confirm this result.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定哪种减重手术能使患者获得最佳的减重效果并缓解 2 型糖尿病。

方法

检索比较 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术(RYGB)与袖状胃切除术(SG)或单吻合胃旁路术(OAGB)的随机对照试验数据库。确定均数差(MD)或相对风险。

结果

分析了 25 项随机对照试验。RYGB 患者的超重减轻率(EWL,百分比)在 3 年(MD:11.93,p<0.00001)和 5 年(MD:13.11,p=0.0004)时更高。RYGB 在 1 年时的多余 BMI 减轻率(百分比)更高(MD:11.66,p=0.01)。RYGB 患者在 3 个月(MD:2.41,p=0.02)、6 个月(MD:3.83,p<0.00001)、1 年(MD:6.35,p<0.00001)和 5 年(MD:3.90,p=0.005)时的总减重(百分比)更大。RYGB 和 SG 在缓解 2 型糖尿病方面没有差异。OAGB 在 1 年后的 EWL 明显比 RYGB 更重要(MD:-10.82,p=0.003)。

结论

RYGB 在中期比 SG 更有效。OAGB 在 1 年后的 EWL 比 RYGB 更大,但需要更多证据来证实这一结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d516/9303972/e9b96788a1e3/OBY-30-614-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d516/9303972/61bba4409b14/OBY-30-614-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d516/9303972/08783f59ba09/OBY-30-614-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d516/9303972/5eb860c801a9/OBY-30-614-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d516/9303972/f5a965c34b34/OBY-30-614-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d516/9303972/c08f23b2a675/OBY-30-614-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d516/9303972/e9b96788a1e3/OBY-30-614-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d516/9303972/61bba4409b14/OBY-30-614-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d516/9303972/08783f59ba09/OBY-30-614-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d516/9303972/5eb860c801a9/OBY-30-614-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d516/9303972/f5a965c34b34/OBY-30-614-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d516/9303972/c08f23b2a675/OBY-30-614-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d516/9303972/e9b96788a1e3/OBY-30-614-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, sleeve gastrectomy, or one-anastomosis gastric bypass? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials.胃旁路术、袖状胃切除术或单吻合口胃旁路术?随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2022 Mar;30(3):614-627. doi: 10.1002/oby.23338. Epub 2022 Feb 8.
2
Comparison of single-anastomosis gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy on type 2 diabetes mellitus remission for obese patients: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.比较单吻合口胃旁路术和袖状胃切除术治疗肥胖 2 型糖尿病患者的疗效:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Asian J Surg. 2023 Oct;46(10):4152-4160. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2023.03.062. Epub 2023 Mar 29.
3
Long-term follow-up after sleeve gastrectomy versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus one-anastomosis gastric bypass: a prospective randomized comparative study of weight loss and remission of comorbidities.袖状胃切除术与 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术与单吻合口胃旁路术的长期随访:减肥和缓解合并症的前瞻性随机对照研究。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Feb;33(2):401-410. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6307-9. Epub 2018 Jun 25.
4
Remission of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) after Sleeve Gastrectomy (SG), One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB), and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB): A Systematic Review.袖状胃切除术(SG)、单吻合口胃旁路术(OAGB)和 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术(RYGB)治疗 2 型糖尿病(T2DM)缓解的系统评价。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 May 19;59(5):985. doi: 10.3390/medicina59050985.
5
[Comparison of 1-year outcomes between Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y duodenojejunal bypass in the patients of obesity with type 2 diabetes mellitus].[肥胖合并2型糖尿病患者中Roux-en-Y胃旁路术与袖状胃切除术加Roux-en-Y十二指肠空肠旁路术1年结局的比较]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2023 Nov 25;26(11):1051-1057. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20230817-00056.
6
Type 2 diabetes remission after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), sleeve gastrectomy (SG), and one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB): results of the longitudinal assessment of bariatric surgery study.胃旁路术(RYGB)、袖状胃切除术(SG)和单吻合口胃旁路术(OAGB)治疗 2 型糖尿病缓解:减肥手术研究的纵向评估结果。
BMC Endocr Disord. 2022 Oct 26;22(1):260. doi: 10.1186/s12902-022-01171-8.
7
Surgery for weight loss in adults.成人减肥手术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Aug 8;2014(8):CD003641. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003641.pub4.
8
Five-Year BAROS Score Outcomes for Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass, One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass, and Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Comparative Study.Roux-en-Y胃旁路术、单吻合口胃旁路术和袖状胃切除术的五年BAROS评分结果:一项比较研究
Obes Surg. 2024 Feb;34(2):487-493. doi: 10.1007/s11695-023-07015-1. Epub 2023 Dec 26.
9
Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass vs Vertical Sleeve Gastrectomy in the Remission of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Roux-en-Y胃旁路术与垂直袖状胃切除术治疗2型糖尿病缓解情况的系统评价和Meta分析
Pol Przegl Chir. 2024 Jan 15;96(3):69-82. doi: 10.5604/01.3001.0054.2674.
10
Comparison of metabolic outcomes in patients undergoing laparoscopic roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy - a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路手术与袖状胃切除术患者代谢结局的比较——一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Swiss Med Wkly. 2018 Jul 5;148:w14633. doi: 10.57187/smw.2018.14633. eCollection 2018.

引用本文的文献

1
Vagal-Sparing Versus Non-Vagal-Sparing Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: Complications and Weight Outcomes.保留迷走神经与不保留迷走神经的Roux-en-Y胃旁路手术:并发症及体重结果
Obes Surg. 2025 Aug 8. doi: 10.1007/s11695-025-08144-5.
2
Optimal Thromboprophylaxis in Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery in a Private Third-Level Center in Mexico City.墨西哥城一家私立三级中心腹腔镜减肥手术的最佳血栓预防措施
Cureus. 2025 Jun 23;17(6):e86593. doi: 10.7759/cureus.86593. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Predictors of Low Muscle Strength and Reduction in Fat-Free Mass in Multi-Ethnic Asian Populations Undergoing Bariatric-Metabolic Surgery.

本文引用的文献

1
Consensus Report: Definition and Interpretation of Remission in Type 2 Diabetes.共识报告:2型糖尿病缓解的定义与解读
Diabetes Care. 2021 Aug 30;44(10):2438-44. doi: 10.2337/dci21-0034.
2
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
3
Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: 5-year outcomes of merged data from two randomized clinical trials (SLEEVEPASS and SM-BOSS).
接受减重代谢手术的多民族亚洲人群中低肌肉力量和去脂体重减少的预测因素
Obes Surg. 2025 Jul 21. doi: 10.1007/s11695-025-08015-z.
4
One-Anastomosis Versus Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass in the Resolution of Comorbidities: A Non-inferiority Meta-analysis and Meta-regression.单吻合术与Roux-en-Y胃旁路术对合并症的治疗效果:一项非劣效性Meta分析和Meta回归分析
Obes Surg. 2025 Jul 18. doi: 10.1007/s11695-025-08077-z.
5
2025 Clinical Practice Guidelines for Diabetes Management in Korea: Recommendation of the Korean Diabetes Association.《2025年韩国糖尿病管理临床实践指南:韩国糖尿病协会的建议》
Diabetes Metab J. 2025 Jul;49(4):582-783. doi: 10.4093/dmj.2025.0469. Epub 2025 Jul 1.
6
Hypoabsorption in Bariatric Surgery: Is the Benefit Worth the Risk?减重手术中的吸收不良:益处是否值得冒风险?
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Feb 25;61(3):398. doi: 10.3390/medicina61030398.
7
The latest evidence and guidance in lifestyle and surgical interventions to achieve weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.关于超重或肥胖人群实现体重减轻的生活方式及手术干预的最新证据与指南。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2025 Apr;27 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):20-34. doi: 10.1111/dom.16296. Epub 2025 Mar 3.
8
Long-Term Outcome of One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: 10-Year Follow-Up of a Single Institution Series.单吻合口胃旁路术的长期结局:单机构系列研究的10年随访
Obes Surg. 2025 Jan;35(1):216-223. doi: 10.1007/s11695-024-07624-4. Epub 2024 Dec 11.
9
Association of preoperative frailty with suboptimal weight loss response among patients undergoing metabolic and bariatric surgery.代谢与减重手术患者术前虚弱与体重减轻反应欠佳的相关性
Surg Endosc. 2024 Dec;38(12):7112-7117. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11285-w. Epub 2024 Sep 29.
10
Short-term gut microbiota's shift after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y vs one anastomosis gastric bypass: results of a multicenter randomized control trial.腹腔镜 Roux-en-Y 与单吻合口胃旁路术后短期肠道微生物群的变化:一项多中心随机对照试验的结果。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Nov;38(11):6643-6656. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11154-6. Epub 2024 Sep 18.
腹腔镜 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术与腹腔镜袖状胃切除术:两项随机临床试验(SLEEVEPASS 和 SM-BOSS)合并数据的 5 年结果。
Br J Surg. 2021 Jan 27;108(1):49-57. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znaa011.
4
Effect of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy vs Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass on Weight Loss and Quality of Life at 7 Years in Patients With Morbid Obesity: The SLEEVEPASS Randomized Clinical Trial.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术与 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术治疗病态肥胖患者 7 年的减肥效果和生活质量比较:SLEEVEPASS 随机临床试验。
JAMA Surg. 2021 Feb 1;156(2):137-146. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.5666.
5
Sleeve gastrectomy or gastric bypass: a "post-code" lottery? A comprehensive national analysis of the utilization of bariatric surgery in Switzerland between 2011-2017.袖状胃切除术或胃旁路手术:“邮政编码”抽奖?对2011年至2017年间瑞士减肥手术使用情况的全国性综合分析。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2021 Mar;17(3):563-574. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2020.10.023. Epub 2020 Oct 22.
6
Revisional surgery after one anastomosis/mini gastric bypass: A narrative review.一次吻合术/迷你胃旁路术后的翻修手术:一篇叙述性综述。
J Res Med Sci. 2020 Jun 30;25:62. doi: 10.4103/jrms.JRMS_727_19. eCollection 2020.
7
One anastomosis gastric bypass vs. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a 5-year follow-up prospective randomized trial.单吻合口胃旁路术与 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术:一项 5 年随访前瞻性随机试验。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2021 Feb;406(1):171-179. doi: 10.1007/s00423-020-01949-1. Epub 2020 Aug 6.
8
Sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Two-year results from a Swedish multicenter randomized controlled trial.袖状胃切除术和 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术治疗 2 型糖尿病:一项瑞典多中心随机对照试验的两年结果。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2020 Aug;16(8):1035-1044. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2020.04.033. Epub 2020 May 5.
9
Laparoscopic Roux-En-Y gastric bypass versus one anastomosis (loop) gastric bypass for obesity: A prospective comparative study of weight loss and complications.腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路术与单吻合口(回肠袢)胃旁路术治疗肥胖症的前瞻性比较研究:体重减轻及并发症情况
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2020 May 18;55:143-147. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.04.040. eCollection 2020 Jul.
10
Biliopancreatic Limb Length in One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: Which Is the Best?单吻合口胃旁路术中胆胰支长度:何者最佳?
Obes Surg. 2020 Oct;30(10):3685-3694. doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-04687-x.