The Wisconsin Poison Center, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
School of Pharmacy, The Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2023 Nov;61(11):941-951. doi: 10.1080/15563650.2023.2285702. Epub 2023 Dec 19.
Phenibut is an unregulated supplement that acts primarily as a gamma-aminobutyric acid type B receptor agonist. Use of phenibut can lead to dependence and subsequent withdrawal when use is stopped. Phenibut withdrawal can cause severe symptoms such as delirium, hallucinations, and seizures. The purpose of this systematic review is to characterize the natural history of phenibut withdrawal and summarize treatment strategies published in the literature.
A systematic review was conducted using the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses checklist. English language peer-reviewed articles or conference abstracts in humans describing phenibut withdrawal after cessation of use were included. Databases (Ovid/MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Science Direct) and references of included articles were searched. Case reports were appraised using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklist for case reports. Patient demographics and key outcomes, including withdrawal characteristics and treatment characteristics, were collected into a predefined data collection sheet by six independent reviewers.
Search results yielded 515 articles of which 25 were included. All articles were case reports or published conference abstracts. All of the cases (100 percent) involved male patients and the median age was 30 years, (interquartile range 23.5-34 years, range 4 days-68 years). The median daily phenibut dose prior to experiencing withdrawal was 10 g (interquartile range 4.75-21.5 g, range 1-200 g). The shortest duration of phenibut use (2-3 g daily) prior to withdrawal was one week. Withdrawal symptoms occurred as quickly as two hours after the last phenibut dose. Sixteen patients (64 percent) reported progression of withdrawal severity within the first 24 hours of healthcare contact. Seizures were reported in two patients (8 percent), intubation in six patients (24 percent), and intensive care unit admission in 11 patients (44 percent). Withdrawal patterns and outcomes were similar in those using phenibut alone and those with comorbid polysubstance use. Withdrawal treatment strategies varied widely. Only three cases (12 percent) were managed outpatient and all three utilized a phenibut tapering strategy. All patients undergoing medication-assisted abstinence were admitted inpatient for symptom management and received a drug that acts on gamma-aminobutyric acid receptors. The most commonly used medication was a benzodiazepine, reported in 17 cases (68 percent). Nineteen patients (76 percent) required at least two drug therapies to manage symptoms. Baclofen was used in 15 cases (60 percent), primarily in conjunction with gamma-aminobutyric acid type A agonists (12 of 15 cases) or as monotherapy during a phenibut taper (two of 15 cases). Two patients using baclofen monotherapy outpatient, after initial stabilization with multiple drug classes, reported adverse effects. One patient had a seizure and the other experienced recurrent withdrawal symptoms, returned to using phenibut, and was admitted to a hospital for withdrawal symptom management with benzodiazepines.
This review is subject to several limitations. Due to the manual nature of article selection, it is possible relevant articles may not have been included. As the entire data set is comprised of case reports it may suffer from publications bias. Outcomes and meaningful conclusions from specific treatment strategies were rarely available because of the heterogeneous nature of case reports. It is possible those reporting only phenibut use were actually using multiple substances. The doses of phenibut a user believed they were taking may be different from what was present in the unregulated product.
Phenibut withdrawal appears to have a range of severity. It is important to recognize that patients undergoing phenibut abstinence may have progressive symptom worsening during early withdrawal. All published cases of abrupt phenibut abstinence were admitted inpatients for symptom management. Benzodiazepines or barbiturates with adjunctive baclofen appear to be the most commonly used drugs for moderate to severe withdrawal. Outpatient management via slow phenibut tapers with or without adjunctive gamma-aminobutyric acid agonist therapy may be successful. However, there is no standard treatment, and consultation with experts (e.g., toxicologists, addiction specialists) experienced in managing withdrawal syndromes is recommended. Significant study is warranted to develop methods of triaging phenibut withdrawal (e.g., severity scoring, inpatient versus outpatient management) and creating optimal treatment regimens.
苯海索是一种不受监管的补充剂,主要作为γ-氨基丁酸 B 型受体激动剂发挥作用。使用苯海索会导致依赖,停止使用后会出现戒断。苯海索戒断会导致严重的症状,如谵妄、幻觉和癫痫发作。本系统评价的目的是描述苯海索戒断的自然史,并总结文献中报道的治疗策略。
使用系统评价和荟萃分析报告项目的首选报告项目清单进行系统评价。纳入了描述停止使用苯海索后戒断的英语同行评审文章或人类会议摘要。数据库(Ovid/MEDLINE、Web of Science 和 Science Direct)和纳入文章的参考文献进行了搜索。使用乔安娜布里格斯研究所对病例报告的关键评估清单对病例报告进行了评估。六位独立审查员将患者人口统计学和关键结果(包括戒断特征和治疗特征)收集到一个预定义的数据收集表中。
搜索结果产生了 515 篇文章,其中 25 篇被纳入。所有文章都是病例报告或发表的会议摘要。所有病例(100%)均为男性患者,中位年龄为 30 岁(四分位间距 23.5-34 岁,范围 4 天-68 岁)。在经历戒断之前,苯海索的每日剂量中位数为 10 克(四分位间距 4.75-21.5 克,范围 1-200 克)。最短的苯海索使用时间(每天 2-3 克)在戒断前为一周。戒断症状在最后一次苯海索剂量后两小时内迅速出现。16 名患者(64%)在医疗保健接触的前 24 小时内报告戒断严重程度进展。两名患者(8%)出现癫痫发作,六名患者(24%)需要插管,11 名患者(44%)需要入住重症监护病房。单独使用苯海索和合并多种物质使用的患者的戒断模式和结果相似。戒断治疗策略差异很大。只有 3 例(12%)患者在门诊接受管理,所有 3 例均采用苯海索逐渐减量的策略。所有接受药物辅助戒断的患者均住院接受症状管理,并使用作用于γ-氨基丁酸受体的药物。最常使用的药物是苯二氮䓬类药物,报告了 17 例(68%)。19 名患者(76%)需要至少两种药物治疗来控制症状。巴氯芬在 15 例(60%)中使用,主要与γ-氨基丁酸 A 型激动剂联合使用(15 例中的 12 例),或作为苯海索逐渐减量的单一疗法(15 例中的 2 例)。两名使用巴氯芬单一疗法的患者在最初使用多种药物类别的稳定后,门诊出现不良反应。一名患者出现癫痫发作,另一名患者出现复发性戒断症状,重新开始使用苯海索,并因戒断症状管理而入院,接受苯二氮䓬类药物治疗。
本综述存在一些局限性。由于文章选择的性质是手动的,因此可能有相关文章未被包括在内。由于整个数据集由病例报告组成,因此可能存在发表偏倚。由于病例报告的性质各不相同,因此很少有关于特定治疗策略的结局和有意义的结论。那些仅报告苯海索使用情况的人实际上可能正在使用多种物质。用户认为他们正在服用的苯海索的剂量可能与不受监管的产品中的实际剂量不同。
苯海索戒断似乎有一定程度的严重程度。重要的是要认识到,经历苯海索戒断的患者可能会在早期戒断期间出现症状恶化。所有突然戒断的苯海索患者均住院接受症状管理。苯二氮䓬类药物或巴比妥类药物联合辅助巴氯芬似乎是治疗中重度戒断的最常用药物。通过缓慢的苯海索减量,联合或不联合γ-氨基丁酸激动剂治疗,门诊管理可能是成功的。然而,目前尚无标准治疗方法,建议咨询熟悉戒断综合征管理的专家(如毒理学家、成瘾专家)。有必要进行大量研究,以制定苯海索戒断(如严重程度评分、门诊与住院管理)的分诊方法,并制定最佳治疗方案。