Simulation and Skills Development Center, Health Affairs, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
King Abdullah bin Abdulaziz University Hospital, Health Affairs, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Dec 19;23(1):972. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04935-5.
Due to the unmet need for valid instruments that evaluate critical components of simulation scenarios, this research aimed to develop and validate an instrument that measures the quality of healthcare simulation scenarios.
A sequential transformative mixed-method research design was used to conduct the study. The development and validation of the instrument involved two phases: the qualitative phase, which included defining the instrument's theoretical background and instrument construction, followed by the quantitative phase, where the instrument was piloted and validated. The qualitative study included 17 healthcare simulation experts, where three focus group was conducted, and the first version of the instrument was constructed based on the focus group analysis and the theoretical framework constructed using the literature review. During the quantitative phase, the instrument's quantitative piloting included 125 healthcare simulation scenarios; then, the instrument went through construct validity and reliability testing.
Content experts confirmed the theoretical model and instrument framework. The average item content validity index (I-CVI) scores and the average of the I-CVI scores (S-CVI/Ave) for all items on the scale or the average proportion relevance judged by all experts was 0.87. The conformity factor analysis results showed a good fit for the proposed 10-factor model (CFI (the comparative fit index) = 0.998, Tucker-Lewis index = 0.998, Root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) = 0.061. The final instrument included ten domains: 1. Learning objectives, 2. Target group, 3. Culture, 4. Scenario case, 5. Scenario narrative briefing, 6. Scenario complexity, 7. Scenario flow, 8. Fidelity, 9. Debriefing, and 10.
The SSQI included 44 items that are rated on a 3-point scale (Meets Expectations = (2), Needs Improvement, (1), Inadequate (0)).
This validated and reliable instrument will be helpful to healthcare educators and simulation experts who want to develop simulation-based training scenarios and ensure the quality of written scenarios.
由于缺乏有效的工具来评估模拟场景的关键组成部分,因此本研究旨在开发和验证一种用于评估医疗保健模拟场景质量的工具。
采用序贯转化混合方法设计进行研究。该工具的开发和验证分为两个阶段:定性阶段,包括确定工具的理论背景和工具构建,然后是定量阶段,在该阶段对工具进行试点和验证。定性研究包括 17 名医疗保健模拟专家,其中进行了三次焦点小组讨论,并根据焦点小组分析和使用文献综述构建的理论框架构建了工具的初始版本。在定量阶段,对工具进行了定量试点,包括 125 个医疗模拟场景;然后,对工具进行了结构有效性和可靠性测试。
内容专家证实了理论模型和工具框架。所有项目的平均项目内容有效性指数(I-CVI)评分和所有专家判断的平均 I-CVI 评分(S-CVI/Ave)的平均值为 0.87。一致性因子分析结果表明,所提出的 10 因素模型拟合良好(比较拟合指数(CFI)=0.998,Tucker-Lewis 指数=0.998,近似均方根误差(RMSEA)=0.061。最终的工具包括十个领域:1.学习目标,2.目标群体,3.文化,4.案例情景,5.情景叙述简介,6.情景复杂性,7.情景流程,8.逼真度,9.讨论,10.评估。SSQI 包括 44 个项目,这些项目的评分标准为 3 分制(符合预期=(2),需要改进=(1),不足=(0))。
该验证和可靠的工具将有助于医疗保健教育者和模拟专家开发基于模拟的培训场景,并确保书面场景的质量。