Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou, China.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Dec 15;102(50):e36647. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000036647.
Current research on the most effective surgical method for papillary thyroid microcarcinoma is in dispute. Specifically, whether a total thyroidectomy (TT) is superior to a thyroid lobectomy (LT) in terms of recurrence rate, postoperative complications, and recurrence-free survival is an issue to be addressed. The objective of this study was to compare TT with LT in terms of recurrence, postoperative complications, and recurrence-free survival.
In accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systemic Reviews and Meta-Analyses standards, the PubMed, Embase, web of science and the Cochrane Library database were searched for relevant studies comparing TT versus LT. By pooling the relative risks (RR) of the 2 surgical procedures, perioperative results of the 2 group can be estimated. Recurrence-free survival was calculated from hazard ratios between the 2 surgical group.
This meta-analysis included 8 studies involving 16,208 patients. In the TT group, there were fewer recurrences than in the LT group. (RR = 0.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.39 to 1.18; P = .001). In subgroup analyses based on country and sample size, there were no significant differences between the 2 groups for the recurrence rates. We found that patients that underwent LT had lower total complication rates (RR = 15.12; 95% CI, 8.89 to 25.73; P = .009), wound recurrent laryngeal nerve injury and hypocalcemia. In terms of survival, TT can provide better recurrence-free survival than LT, with a hazard ratios of 0.57 (95% CI 0.36 to 0.90; P = .003).
Comparing TT with LT, no statistical difference was found in recurrence rates between the 2 groups. In addition, the analysis showed a slight improvement in long-term recurrence-free survival for patients who underwent TT than for those who underwent LT, a finding with potential clinical implications for management decisions on papillary thyroid microcarcinoma treatment.
目前对于甲状腺微小乳头状癌最有效的手术方法的研究存在争议。具体来说,全甲状腺切除术(TT)是否在复发率、术后并发症和无复发生存方面优于甲状腺叶切除术(LT),是一个需要解决的问题。本研究旨在比较 TT 与 LT 在复发、术后并发症和无复发生存方面的差异。
根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目标准,检索 PubMed、Embase、web of science 和 Cochrane 图书馆数据库,比较 TT 与 LT 的相关研究。通过对 2 种手术方法的相对风险(RR)进行汇总,可以估计 2 组的围手术期结果。从 2 种手术组之间的风险比计算无复发生存率。
本荟萃分析纳入了 8 项研究,共 16208 例患者。在 TT 组中,复发率低于 LT 组。(RR=0.68;95%置信区间[CI],0.39 至 1.18;P=0.001)。基于国家和样本量的亚组分析,2 组的复发率无显著差异。我们发现,行 LT 的患者总并发症发生率较低(RR=15.12;95%CI,8.89 至 25.73;P=0.009),包括喉返神经损伤和低钙血症。在生存方面,TT 可提供比 LT 更好的无复发生存率,风险比为 0.57(95%CI 0.36 至 0.90;P=0.003)。
与 LT 相比,2 组之间的复发率无统计学差异。此外,分析显示,行 TT 的患者长期无复发生存率略有改善,这对甲状腺微小乳头状癌治疗管理决策具有潜在的临床意义。