University of Rhode Island, Kingston, Rhode Island, USA.
Providence College, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
J Sleep Res. 2024 Aug;33(4):e14111. doi: 10.1111/jsr.14111. Epub 2023 Dec 20.
The effects of sleep deprivation on emotional function are not yet fully understood. Although sleep deprivation has been shown to have larger effects on positive emotional reactivity than on negative, this research has been limited by the use of separate stimuli for positive and negative emotion elicitation. Different sets of stimuli represent a confound that makes it difficult to interpret this difference with confidence. The study reported here was designed to overcome this limitation by using film clips that elicit both positive and negative emotional responses at the same time. Undergraduate participants (33 female, 2 male) completed a laboratory-based emotion elicitation procedure using these film clips. Differences in sleep deprivation, estimated by subjective sleepiness and reaction times, were used to predict responses to these emotion probes. Greater subjective sleepiness was associated with significantly lesser positive responses to the film clips (r = -0.37, p = 0.03). The relationship between subjective sleepiness and negative responses to the same clips was smaller and not significant (r = -0.11, p = 0.51). Reaction times were not related to subjective emotional responses in this sample (all p > 0.40). These results support the theory that sleepiness has asymmetrical effects on positive and negative emotional functioning.
睡眠剥夺对情绪功能的影响尚未完全被理解。尽管睡眠剥夺对积极情绪反应的影响大于对消极情绪反应的影响,但这项研究受到了用于诱发积极和消极情绪的分离刺激的限制。不同的刺激集是一种混淆因素,使得很难有信心地解释这种差异。本报告中的研究旨在通过使用同时诱发积极和消极情绪反应的电影片段来克服这一限制。本科生参与者(33 名女性,2 名男性)使用这些电影片段完成了一项基于实验室的情绪诱发程序。通过主观嗜睡和反应时间来估计睡眠剥夺的差异,以预测对这些情绪探针的反应。主观嗜睡程度越高,对电影片段的积极反应就越低(r = -0.37,p = 0.03)。主观嗜睡与对同一片段的消极反应之间的关系较小且不显著(r = -0.11,p = 0.51)。在这个样本中,反应时间与主观情绪反应没有关系(所有 p 值均大于 0.40)。这些结果支持了睡眠剥夺对积极和消极情绪功能具有不对称影响的理论。