Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Comprehensive Center for Clinical Neurosciences and Mental Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
J Neurol. 2024 Apr;271(4):1937-1946. doi: 10.1007/s00415-023-12101-6. Epub 2023 Dec 21.
Neuromuscular disorders (NMDs) are heterogeneous conditions with a considerable fraction attributed to monogenic defects. Despite the advancements in genomic medicine, many patients remain without a diagnosis. Here, we investigate whether a comprehensive reassessment strategy improves the diagnostic outcomes.
We analyzed 263 patients with NMD phenotypes that underwent diagnostic exome or genome sequencing at our tertiary referral center between 2015 and 2023. We applied a comprehensive reassessment encompassing variant reclassification, re-phenotyping and NGS data reanalysis. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify predictive factors associated with a molecular diagnosis.
Initially, a molecular diagnosis was identified in 53 cases (20%), while an additional 23 (9%) had findings of uncertain significance. Following comprehensive reassessment, the diagnostic yield increased to 23%, revealing 44 distinct monogenic etiologies. Reasons for newly obtained molecular diagnoses were variant reclassifications in 7 and NGS data reanalysis in 3 cases including one recently described disease-gene association (DNAJB4). Male sex reduced the odds of receiving a molecular diagnosis (OR 0.42; 95%CI 0.21-0.82), while a positive family history (OR 5.46; 95%CI 2.60-11.76) and a myopathy phenotype (OR 2.72; 95%CI 1.11-7.14) increased the likelihood. 7% were resolved through targeted genetic testing or classified as acquired etiologies.
Our findings reinforce the use of NGS in NMDs of suspected monogenic origin. We show that a comprehensive reassessment enhances diagnostic accuracy. However, one needs to be aware that genetic diagnoses are often made with uncertainty and can even be downgraded based on new evidence.
神经肌肉疾病(NMDs)是异质性疾病,相当一部分归因于单基因缺陷。尽管基因组医学取得了进步,但许多患者仍未得到诊断。在这里,我们研究了综合重新评估策略是否能提高诊断结果。
我们分析了 2015 年至 2023 年间在我们的三级转诊中心接受诊断外显子组或基因组测序的 263 名 NMD 表型患者。我们应用了一种综合重新评估方法,包括变异重新分类、重新表型和 NGS 数据分析。多变量逻辑回归用于识别与分子诊断相关的预测因素。
最初,53 例(20%)确定了分子诊断,另外 23 例(9%)存在不确定意义的发现。经过综合重新评估,诊断率提高到 23%,揭示了 44 种不同的单基因病因。新获得分子诊断的原因包括 7 例变异重新分类和 3 例 NGS 数据分析,其中包括一个最近描述的疾病基因关联(DNAJB4)。男性性别降低了获得分子诊断的几率(OR 0.42;95%CI 0.21-0.82),而阳性家族史(OR 5.46;95%CI 2.60-11.76)和肌病表型(OR 2.72;95%CI 1.11-7.14)增加了获得诊断的可能性。7%通过靶向基因测试解决或归类为获得性病因。
我们的发现强化了在疑似单基因起源的 NMD 中使用 NGS。我们表明,综合重新评估可提高诊断准确性。然而,需要注意的是,遗传诊断通常存在不确定性,甚至可能根据新证据降级。