• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

长期护理中的长新冠:快速现实主义综述。

Long COVID in long-term care: a rapid realist review.

机构信息

Long Term Care & Assisted Living, Fraser Health Authority, Surrey, British Columbia, Canada.

Long Term Care & Assisted Living, Fraser Health Authority, Surrey, British Columbia, Canada

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2023 Dec 20;13(12):e076186. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076186.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076186
PMID:38128935
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10748963/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The goals of this rapid realist review were to ask: (a) what are the key mechanisms that drive successful interventions for long COVID in long-term care (LTC) and (b) what are the critical contexts that determine whether the mechanisms produce the intended outcomes?

DESIGN

Rapid realist review.

DATA SOURCES

Medline, CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO and Web of Science for peer-reviewed literature and Google for grey literature were searched up to 23 February 2023.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

We included sources focused on interventions, persons in LTC, long COVID or post-acute phase at least 4 weeks following initial COVID-19 infection and ones that had a connection with source materials.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Three independent reviewers searched, screened and coded studies. Two independent moderators resolved conflicts. A data extraction tool organised relevant data into context-mechanism-outcome configurations using realist methodology. Twenty-one sources provided 51 intervention data excerpts used to develop our programme theory. Synthesised findings were presented to a reference group and expert panel for confirmatory purposes.

RESULTS

Fifteen peer-reviewed articles and six grey literature sources were eligible for inclusion. Eleven context-mechanism-outcome configurations identify those contextual factors and underlying mechanisms associated with desired outcomes, such as clinical care processes and policies that ensure timely access to requisite resources for quality care delivery, and resident-centred assessments and care planning to address resident preferences and needs. The underlying mechanisms associated with enhanced outcomes for LTC long COVID survivors were: awareness, accountability, vigilance and empathetic listening.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the LTC sector struggles with organisational capacity issues, they should be aware that comprehensively assessing and monitoring COVID-19 survivors and providing timely interventions to those with long COVID is imperative. This is due to the greater care needs of residents with long COVID, and coordinated efficient care is required to optimise their quality of life.

摘要

目的

本快速现实主义综述旨在探讨:(a)在长期护理(LTC)中,哪些是推动长新冠干预成功的关键机制;(b)哪些是决定这些机制是否产生预期结果的关键背景?

设计

快速现实主义综述。

数据来源

截至 2023 年 2 月 23 日,通过 Medline、CINAHL、Embase、PsycINFO 和 Web of Science 检索同行评议文献,通过 Google 检索灰色文献。

入选标准

我们纳入了专注于干预措施、LTC 中的人、长新冠或急性后阶段至少 4 周以上的新冠感染患者以及与原始材料有联系的研究。

数据提取与综合

三位独立评审员搜索、筛选和编码研究。两位独立的调和员解决了冲突。使用现实主义方法,数据提取工具将相关数据组织到情景-机制-结果配置中。21 个来源提供了 51 个干预措施数据摘录,用于制定我们的计划理论。综合结果被提交给参考小组和专家小组进行确认。

结果

15 篇同行评议文章和 6 篇灰色文献来源符合纳入标准。11 个情景-机制-结果配置确定了与预期结果相关的背景因素和潜在机制,例如确保及时获得必要资源以提供高质量护理的临床护理流程和政策,以及针对居民偏好和需求进行居民为中心的评估和护理计划。与 LTC 长新冠幸存者改善结果相关的潜在机制包括:意识、问责制、警惕和同理心倾听。

结论

尽管长期护理部门面临组织能力问题,但他们应该意识到,全面评估和监测新冠幸存者并及时为长新冠患者提供干预措施至关重要。这是因为长新冠患者的护理需求更大,需要协调高效的护理以优化他们的生活质量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/feba/10748963/df9a0159ce40/bmjopen-2023-076186f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/feba/10748963/df9a0159ce40/bmjopen-2023-076186f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/feba/10748963/df9a0159ce40/bmjopen-2023-076186f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Long COVID in long-term care: a rapid realist review.长期护理中的长新冠:快速现实主义综述。
BMJ Open. 2023 Dec 20;13(12):e076186. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076186.
2
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
5
6
Towards achieving interorganisational collaboration between health-care providers: a realist evidence synthesis.实现医疗机构间合作的途径:一项基于实际证据的系统综述。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Jun;11(6):1-130. doi: 10.3310/KPLT1423.
7
Practical nursing recommendations for palliative care for people with dementia living in long-term care facilities during the COVID-19 pandemic: A rapid scoping review.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,对长期护理机构中患有痴呆症的人的姑息治疗的实用护理建议:快速范围审查。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2021 Jan;113:103781. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103781. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
8
How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?“护理路径技术”对卒中护理服务整合的影响是如何衡量的,以及有哪些证据支持其在这方面的有效性?
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2008 Mar;6(1):78-110. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2007.00098.x.
9
10
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.

引用本文的文献

1
Post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 in residents in long-term care homes: Examining symptoms and recovery over time.长期护理机构居民中新冠病毒病的急性后遗症:症状及随时间恢复情况的研究
PLoS One. 2025 May 5;20(5):e0321295. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321295. eCollection 2025.
2
Theory development of under what circumstances and what works for promoting disaster preparedness among long-term care facility (LTCF) stakeholders: protocol for realist review.长期护理机构(LTCF)利益相关者在何种情况下以及采取何种措施促进备灾的理论发展:现实主义综述方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Mar 6;15(3):e087837. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087837.
3
A Novel Facet of In-Hospital Food Consumption Associated with Hospital Mortality in Patients with Scheduled Admission-Addition of a Study Protocol to Test the Existence of Effects of COVID-19 in the Same Study in the Post-COVID-19 Period.

本文引用的文献

1
Grand rounds in methodology: when are realist reviews useful, and what does a 'good' realist review look like?方法学大查房:何时使用现实主义综述有用,以及“好”的现实主义综述是什么样的?
BMJ Qual Saf. 2023 Mar;32(3):173-180. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2022-015236. Epub 2022 Dec 29.
2
A qualitative exploration of the clinical presentation, trajectory, management and recovery of COVID-19 in older people: Learning from frontline staff experiences.对老年人 COVID-19 的临床表现、病程、管理和康复的定性探索:从一线工作人员的经验中学习。
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Nov;30(6):e5223-e5233. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13941. Epub 2022 Aug 13.
3
一种与计划性住院患者院内死亡相关的新的住院期间食物消费模式-在 COVID-19 后时期同一研究中加入研究方案以检验 COVID-19 影响存在性的研究方案。
Nutrients. 2024 Jul 19;16(14):2327. doi: 10.3390/nu16142327.
4
Exploring Post-COVID-19 Functional Outcomes in Residents in Long-Term Care Homes in British Columbia, Canada.探索加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省长期护理机构居民感染新冠病毒后的功能转归情况。
Gerontol Geriatr Med. 2024 May 21;10:23337214241245551. doi: 10.1177/23337214241245551. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
Malnutrition and Sarcopenia in COVID-19 Survivors.
COVID-19 幸存者的营养不良和肌肉减少症。
Clin Geriatr Med. 2022 Aug;38(3):559-564. doi: 10.1016/j.cger.2022.04.001. Epub 2022 Apr 21.
4
Unintended Consequences of Pandemic Management Strategies on Residents and Family in One Long-term Care Home in British Columbia: A Patient-Supported Qualitative Study.不列颠哥伦比亚省一家长期护理院大流行管理策略对居民和家庭的意外影响:一项患者支持的定性研究
Innov Aging. 2022 Jul 2;6(5):igac036. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igac036. eCollection 2022.
5
A call to action to enhance understanding of long COVID in long-term care home residents.呼吁采取行动,加强对长期护理机构居民中新冠长期症状的了解。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022 Jul;70(7):1943-1945. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17889. Epub 2022 May 26.
6
Potential for Drug Interactions and Polypharmacy From Treatment of COVID-19 in Long-Term Care.长期护理机构中新冠病毒病治疗引发药物相互作用及多种药物联合使用的可能性
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2022 Jun;23(6):949-950. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2022.03.016. Epub 2022 Apr 6.
7
The Recovery After COVID-19 in Nursing Home Residents.新冠疫情后养老院居民的康复情况
Gerontol Geriatr Med. 2022 Apr 11;8:23337214221094192. doi: 10.1177/23337214221094192. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
8
Post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection in nursing homes: Do not forget the most vulnerable.养老院中新冠病毒感染的急性后遗症:勿遗忘最脆弱群体。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022 May;70(5):1352-1354. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17760. Epub 2022 Mar 25.
9
Psychological and Functional Impact of COVID-19 in Long-Term Care Facilities: The COVID-A Study.长期护理机构中 COVID-19 的心理和功能影响:COVID-A 研究。
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2022 Apr;30(4):431-443. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2022.01.007. Epub 2022 Jan 22.
10
COVID-19: endemic doesn't mean harmless.新冠病毒:地方性流行并不意味着无害。
Nature. 2022 Jan;601(7894):485. doi: 10.1038/d41586-022-00155-x.