Suppr超能文献

TikTok上与前交叉韧带相关内容的有效性。

Validity of Material Related to the Anterior Cruciate Ligament on TikTok.

作者信息

D'Ambrosi Riccardo, Hewett Timothy E

机构信息

IRCCS Ospedale Galeazzi-Sant'Ambrogio, Milan, Italy.

Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche per la Salute, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Orthop J Sports Med. 2024 Feb 22;12(2):23259671241228543. doi: 10.1177/23259671241228543. eCollection 2024 Feb.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Video material is one of the most common types of digital information on social media platforms.

PURPOSE

To assess the validity and informational value of TikTok videos with regard to the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL).

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

METHODS

Using the terms "anterior cruciate ligament" AND/OR "ACL," 420 TikTok videos were retrieved, of which 100 videos were included in the analysis. The video duration and the number of likes, shares, and views were recorded. Videos were categorized based on the source (private user, physical therapist, surgeon, and researcher), subject type (patient experience, physical therapy, injury mechanism, anatomy, clinical test, and surgical technique), content (patient experience/testimony, education, and rehabilitation), and any background audio (music or voice). Video quality assessments were conducted using the DISCERN instrument, The () benchmark criteria, and the Global Quality Score (GQS). Associations between quantitative variables were tested using the Spearman rank correlation. One-way analysis of variance or Mann-Whitney test was performed to assess whether video quality differed by video characteristics.

RESULTS

A total of 41 videos were published by private users (41%), 34 by physical therapists (34%), 23 by surgeons (23%), and 2 by researchers (2%). Most of the information regarded patient experience (34%), followed by physical therapy (20%), injury mechanism (19%), anatomy (11%), clinical test (9%), and surgical technique (7%). The mean video length was 40.55 ± 41.58 seconds. The mean number of views was 151,084.39 ± 487,150.02, while the mean numbers of comments, likes, and shares were 72.80 ± 249.68, 6781.49 ± 29,163.96, and 98.71 ± 307.76, respectively. The mean DISCERN, , and GQS scores were 15.73 ± 1.44, 0.19 ± 0.39, and 1.16 ± 0.37, respectively, indicating the poorest quality on all 3 indices. The number of views, likes, shares, comments, and video lengths were all positively correlated with DISCERN (except the number of shares), , and GQS scores ( < .05). A significant difference was found in DISCERN scores between videos by private users and those by surgeons (15.37 ± 0.98 vs 16.22 ± 1.57; = .007).

CONCLUSION

Our analysis has demonstrated that the educational value of these videos on the ACL on TikTok is poor. Given the rapid growth of TikTok, further research is needed.

摘要

背景

视频素材是社交媒体平台上最常见的数字信息类型之一。

目的

评估TikTok视频在前交叉韧带(ACL)方面的有效性和信息价值。

研究设计

横断面研究。

方法

使用“前交叉韧带”和/或“ACL”等术语检索到420条TikTok视频,其中100条视频纳入分析。记录视频时长以及点赞、分享和观看次数。视频根据来源(私人用户、物理治疗师、外科医生和研究人员)、主题类型(患者体验、物理治疗、损伤机制、解剖学、临床检查和手术技术)、内容(患者体验/证词、教育和康复)以及任何背景音频(音乐或语音)进行分类。使用DISCERN工具、()基准标准和全球质量评分(GQS)进行视频质量评估。使用Spearman等级相关性检验定量变量之间的关联。进行单因素方差分析或Mann-Whitney检验以评估视频质量是否因视频特征而异。

结果

私人用户发布了41条视频(41%),物理治疗师发布了34条(34%),外科医生发布了23条(23%),研究人员发布了2条(2%)。大多数信息涉及患者体验(34%),其次是物理治疗(20%)、损伤机制(19%)、解剖学(11%)、临床检查(9%)和手术技术(7%)。视频平均时长为40.55±41.58秒。平均观看次数为151,084.39±487,150.02,而评论、点赞和分享的平均次数分别为72.80±249.68、6781.49±29,163.96和98.71±307.76。DISCERN、()和GQS的平均得分分别为15.73±1.44、0.19±0.39和1.16±0.37,表明在所有三个指标上质量最差。观看次数、点赞数、分享数、评论数和视频时长均与DISCERN(分享数除外)、()和GQS得分呈正相关(P<0.05)。发现私人用户发布的视频与外科医生发布的视频在DISCERN得分上存在显著差异(15.37±0.98对16.22±1.57;P = 0.007)。

结论

我们的分析表明,TikTok上这些关于ACL的视频的教育价值较差。鉴于TikTok的快速发展,需要进一步研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c2c/10893838/4a25b186edaf/10.1177_23259671241228543-fig1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验