Cakir Muzaffer Utku, Yavuz-Aksu Berna, Aksu Ugur
Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, University of Istanbul, Istanbul 34134, Turkey.
Duzen Laboratory Group, Biochemistry Section, Istanbul 34394, Turkey.
J Transl Int Med. 2022 Nov 15;11(4):393-400. doi: 10.2478/jtim-2022-0045. eCollection 2023 Dec.
Haemodilution leads to complications in clinical practice. It is exactly unknown whether this damage is caused by the fluid or by the stretching of the vascular bed. We aimed to compare two different haemodilution techniques at the same anaemic level.
Normovolemic or hypervolemic haemodilution was performed on twelve adult male Wistar rats. In the normovolemic procedure, blood was withdrawn and instantaneously administered with similar amounts of 6% hydroxyethyl starch (HES 130/0.4). Fluid was administered without withdrawing blood in the hypervolemic procedure. In both models, a 25% haematocrit level was targeted and kept at this level for 90 min to deepen the anaemia effect. Besides haemodynamics measurement, renal function (creatinine, blood urea nitrogen) and injury (tissue norepinephrine, malondialdehyde) were evaluated. Also, systemic hypoxia (lactate), oxidative stress (malondialdehyde, ischaemia-modified albumin), inflammation (tumour necrosis factor-alpha [TNF-α]), osmotic stress, adrenal stress (norepinephrine, epinephrine), and vascular stretching (atrial natriuretic peptide [ANP]) were assessed.
Arterial pressure in the normovolemic group was lower than in the hypervolemic group. Serum creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, and lactate levels were higher in the normovolemic group. Tissue norepinephrine and malondialdehyde levels were higher in the normovolemic group. Serum ANP, malondialdehyde, ischaemia-modified albumin, free haemoglobin, syndecan-1, and TNF-α were higher in both groups compared to respective baseline.
Normovolemic haemodilution may lead to hypoxic kidney injury. The hypervolemic state may be advantageous if fluid is to be administered. Thus, the effect of the fluid itself can be relatively masked.
血液稀释在临床实践中会引发并发症。目前尚不清楚这种损害是由液体本身还是血管床的扩张所致。我们旨在比较在相同贫血水平下的两种不同血液稀释技术。
对12只成年雄性Wistar大鼠进行等容或高容血液稀释。在等容程序中,抽取血液并即刻输注等量的6%羟乙基淀粉(HES 130/0.4)。在高容程序中,不抽血而直接输注液体。在两种模型中,目标是使血细胞比容达到25%并维持90分钟以加深贫血效应。除了测量血流动力学外,还评估了肾功能(肌酐、血尿素氮)和损伤情况(组织去甲肾上腺素、丙二醛)。此外,还评估了全身缺氧(乳酸)、氧化应激(丙二醛、缺血修饰白蛋白)、炎症(肿瘤坏死因子-α [TNF-α])、渗透压应激、肾上腺应激(去甲肾上腺素、肾上腺素)和血管扩张(心钠素 [ANP])。
等容组的动脉压低于高容组。等容组的血清肌酐、血尿素氮和乳酸水平较高。等容组的组织去甲肾上腺素和丙二醛水平较高。与各自的基线相比,两组的血清ANP、丙二醛、缺血修饰白蛋白、游离血红蛋白、多配体蛋白聚糖-1和TNF-α均升高。
等容血液稀释可能导致缺氧性肾损伤。如果要输注液体,高容状态可能更具优势。因此,液体本身的影响可能会相对被掩盖。