Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Centre, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany.
Curr Oncol. 2023 Nov 23;30(12):10085-10099. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30120733.
Pretherapeutic discussion in the head and neck tumor board (HNT) has been mandatory at the University Medical Center Freiburg since 01/2015, and it is intended to contribute to a survival benefit through interdisciplinary decision making. Prior to 2015, an optional HNT existed in which mainly advanced tumor stages were discussed. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of a pretherapeutic HNT on treatment and survival in laryngeal cancer.
A retrospective data analysis of 412 laryngeal carcinoma patients treated at the Head and Neck Cancer Center of the University Medical Center Freiburg between 01/2010 and 12/2020 was conducted. Differences regarding TNM status, UICC classification, tumor localization, gender and age at initial diagnosis, recurrence, secondary tumors, therapy, 5-year survival, and 5-year recurrence-free survival (5YSR/5Y-RFS) were assessed for therapy initiation with or without a pretherapeutic HNT.
In total, 314 patients underwent a pretherapeutic HNT, and 98 received therapy initiation without an HNT. The HNT group showed significantly more advanced T stages and UICC classifications ( < 0.001; = 0.003) and more frequent primary chemo/radiotherapy ( < 0.001). There was no significant difference regarding 5YSR (43 vs. 47 months, = 0.96) or 5Y-RFS (48 vs. 52 months, = 0.16). The time between initial diagnosis and therapy initiation was significantly longer when an HNT was performed (38 vs. 20 days, = 0.008).
The HNT group showed significantly more advanced tumor stages, suggesting that even before it became mandatory, it was frequently used for interdisciplinary case discussion in more complex cases. Due to the small number of T3/4 patients in the non-HNT group, a survival advantage of an HNT cannot be validly demonstrated in our study. However, the HNT led to broader patient counselling regarding their therapy options. At the same time, a significant delay in therapy initiation could be seen, suggesting that workflows between diagnosis, HNT presentation, and therapy initiation should be optimized.
自 2015 年 1 月以来,弗莱堡大学医学中心的头颈部肿瘤委员会(HNT)的预治疗讨论已成为强制性要求,其目的是通过跨学科决策来提高生存率。在 2015 年之前,存在一个可选的 HNT,主要讨论晚期肿瘤。本研究的目的是确定预治疗 HNT 对头颈部癌症治疗和生存的影响。
对弗莱堡大学医学中心头颈部癌症中心 2010 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月期间治疗的 412 例喉癌患者进行回顾性数据分析。评估了治疗开始时有无预治疗 HNT 的患者的 TNM 分期、UICC 分类、肿瘤定位、性别和初诊年龄、复发、继发肿瘤、治疗、5 年生存率和 5 年无复发生存率(5YSR/5Y-RFS)之间的差异。
共有 314 例患者接受了预治疗 HNT,98 例患者在没有 HNT 的情况下开始治疗。HNT 组 T 分期和 UICC 分类明显更晚(<0.001;=0.003),且原发放化疗更频繁(<0.001)。5YSR(43 个月 vs. 47 个月,=0.96)或 5Y-RFS(48 个月 vs. 52 个月,=0.16)无显著差异。进行 HNT 时,从初诊到开始治疗的时间明显延长(38 天 vs. 20 天,=0.008)。
HNT 组显示出明显更晚期的肿瘤分期,这表明即使在它成为强制性要求之前,它也经常被用于更复杂病例的跨学科病例讨论。由于非 HNT 组 T3/4 患者数量较少,因此本研究不能有效地证明 HNT 的生存优势。然而,HNT 使患者在治疗方案方面得到了更广泛的咨询。同时,治疗开始时间明显延迟,这表明应优化诊断、HNT 演示和治疗开始之间的工作流程。