Quel de Oliveira Camila, Bundy Anita, Middleton James W, Refshauge Kathryn, Rogers Kris, Davis Glen M
Sydney School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Discipline of Physiotherapy, Graduate School of Health, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW 2007, Australia.
J Clin Med. 2023 Dec 8;12(24):7588. doi: 10.3390/jcm12247588.
(1) Background: Despite inconclusive evidence on the benefits of activity-based therapies (ABTs) in people with spinal cord injuries, implementation has occurred in clinics worldwide in response to consumers' requests. We explored the clinical changes and participants' perceptions from engaging in an ABT program in the community. (2) Methods: This mixed-methods study involved a pragmatic observational multiple-baseline design and an evaluation of participants' perceptions. Fifteen participants were included. Outcome measures were balance in sitting using the Seated Reach Distance test, mobility using the Modified Rivermead Mobility Index and quality of life using the Quality of Life Index SCI version pre- and post-participation in an ABT community-based program. Linear mixed models and logistic regressions were used to analyse the effects of intervention. Semi-structured interviews explored participants' perceptions using inductive thematic analysis. (3) Results: There was an increase of 9% in the standardised reach distance (95% CI 2-16) for sitting balance, 1.33 points (95% CI: 0.81-1.85) in mobility and 1.9 points (0.17-2.1) in quality of life. Two themes emerged from the interviews: (1) reduced impact of disability and an increased sense of life as before, and (2) the program was superior to usual rehabilitation. No adverse events related to the intervention were observed. (4) Conclusion: ABT delivered in the community improved clinical outcomes in people with a chronic SCI. High levels of satisfaction with the program were reported.
(1) 背景:尽管关于基于活动的疗法(ABTs)对脊髓损伤患者益处的证据尚无定论,但应消费者需求,该疗法已在全球范围内的诊所实施。我们探讨了参与社区ABT项目后的临床变化及参与者的看法。(2) 方法:这项混合方法研究采用了实用的观察性多基线设计,并对参与者的看法进行了评估。纳入了15名参与者。在参与基于社区的ABT项目前后,使用坐位前伸距离测试评估坐位平衡,使用改良的Rivermead活动指数评估活动能力,使用生活质量指数SCI版本评估生活质量。采用线性混合模型和逻辑回归分析干预效果。通过半结构化访谈,采用归纳主题分析法探索参与者的看法。(3) 结果:坐位平衡的标准化前伸距离增加了9%(95%可信区间2 - 16),活动能力提高了1.33分(95%可信区间:0.81 - 1.85),生活质量提高了1.9分(0.17 - 2.1)。访谈中出现了两个主题:(1) 残疾影响减轻,生活感觉如前增强;(2) 该项目优于常规康复。未观察到与干预相关的不良事件。(4) 结论:在社区实施的ABT改善了慢性脊髓损伤患者的临床结局。报告显示对该项目满意度较高。