Agroscope, Agroecology and Environment, Zurich, Switzerland; ETH Zurich, Institute for Terrestrial Ecosystems, Ecosystem Management, Zurich, Switzerland.
Agroscope, Agroecology and Environment, Zurich, Switzerland.
Sci Total Environ. 2024 Feb 20;912:169494. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.169494. Epub 2023 Dec 22.
Floral resource loss and pesticide exposure are major threats to bees in intensively managed agroecosystems, but interactions among these drivers remain poorly understood. Altered composition and lowered diversity of pollen nutrition may reinforce negative pesticide impacts on bees. Here we investigated the development and survival of the solitary bee Osmia bicornis provisioned with three different pollen types, as well as a mixture of these types representing a higher pollen diversity. We exposed bees of each nutritional treatment to five pesticides at different concentrations in the laboratory. Two field-realistic concentrations of three nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) modulating insecticides (thiacloprid, sulfoxaflor and flupyradifurone), as well as of two fungicides (azoxystrobin and tebuconazole) were examined. We further measured the expression of two detoxification genes (CYP9BU1, CYP9BU2) under exposure to thiacloprid across different nutrition treatments as a potential mechanistic pathway driving pesticide-nutrition interactions. We found that more diverse pollen nutrition reduced development time, enhanced pollen efficacy (cocoon weight divided by consumed pollen weight) and pollen consumption, and increased weight of O. bicornis after larval development (cocoon weight). Contrary to fungicides, high field-realistic concentrations of all three insecticides negatively affected O. bicornis by extending development times. Moreover, sulfoxaflor and flupyradifurone also reduced pollen efficacy and cocoon weight, and sulfoxaflor reduced pollen consumption and increased mortality. The expression of detoxification genes differed across pollen nutrition types, but was not enhanced after exposure to thiacloprid. Our findings highlight that lowered diversity of pollen nutrition and high field-realistic exposure to nAChR modulating insecticides negatively affected the development of O. bicornis, but we found no mitigation of negative pesticide impacts through increased pollen diversity. These results have important implications for risk assessment for bee pollinators, indicating that negative effects of nAChR modulating insecticides to developing solitary bees are currently underestimated.
在集约化农业生态系统中,花卉资源的丧失和农药暴露对蜜蜂构成了主要威胁,但这些驱动因素之间的相互作用仍知之甚少。花粉营养成分的改变和多样性的降低可能会加剧农药对蜜蜂的负面影响。在这里,我们研究了三种不同花粉类型以及这些类型的混合物(代表更高的花粉多样性)为食的独居蜜蜂 Osmia bicornis 的发育和生存。我们将每种营养处理的蜜蜂暴露在实验室中的五种不同浓度的农药中。我们检查了三种作用于烟碱型乙酰胆碱受体(nAChR)的调制杀虫剂(噻虫啉、噻虫胺和氟吡呋喃酮),以及两种杀菌剂(唑菌胺酯和戊唑醇)的两个田间现实浓度。我们还测量了 CYP9BU1 和 CYP9BU2 两种解毒基因在噻虫啉暴露下不同营养处理下的表达情况,作为潜在的机制途径,推动了农药-营养相互作用。我们发现,更多样化的花粉营养减少了发育时间,提高了花粉功效(茧重除以消耗的花粉重量)和花粉消耗,并增加了 O. bicornis 幼虫发育后的体重(茧重)。与杀菌剂相反,所有三种杀虫剂的高田间现实浓度通过延长发育时间对 O. bicornis 产生负面影响。此外,噻虫胺和氟吡呋喃酮还降低了花粉功效和茧重,而噻虫胺降低了花粉消耗并增加了死亡率。解毒基因的表达在不同的花粉营养类型之间有所不同,但在暴露于噻虫啉后没有增强。我们的研究结果表明,花粉营养多样性降低和高田间现实浓度接触 nAChR 调制杀虫剂对 O. bicornis 的发育产生负面影响,但我们没有发现通过增加花粉多样性来减轻农药的负面影响。这些结果对蜜蜂传粉者的风险评估具有重要意义,表明目前对 nAChR 调制杀虫剂对正在发育的独居蜜蜂的负面影响估计不足。