Suppr超能文献

杀虫剂呋虫胺单独及与杀菌剂氟唑菌酰胺联合对 3 种蜜蜂的毒性。

Toxicity of the insecticide sulfoxaflor alone and in combination with the fungicide fluxapyroxad in three bee species.

机构信息

Dipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie Agro-Alimentari, Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna, Viale Fanin 42, 40127, Bologna, Italy.

CREAF, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193, Bellaterra, Spain.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 25;11(1):6821. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-86036-1.

Abstract

The sulfoximine insecticide sulfoxaflor is regarded as a potential substitute for neonicotinoids that were recently banned in the EU due to their side effects on bees. Like neonicotinoids, sulfoxaflor acts as a competitive modulator of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. In agricultural environments, bees are commonly exposed to combinations of pesticides, and neonicotinoids are known to interact synergistically with fungicides. The objective of our study is to assess the acute oral toxicity of sulfoxaflor alone and in combination with a single dose of fluxapyroxad, a succinate dehydrogenase inhibitor (SDHI) fungicide, in three bee species: Apis mellifera, Bombus terrestris and Osmia bicornis. Because synergism may be dose-dependent, we tested a range of sulfoxaflor doses. Synergistic effects were assessed using three different approaches: Bliss criterion of drugs independence, ratio test comparing LDs and model deviation ratio. Osmia bicornis was the most sensitive species to sulfoxaflor and both O. bicornis and A. mellifera showed significant synergism between the insecticide and the fungicide. For the most part, these synergistic effects were weak and only occurred at early assessment times and intermediate sulfoxaflor doses. The potential ecological relevance of these effects should be confirmed in field and/or cage studies. Overall, our laboratory results demonstrate that sulfoxaflor is somewhat less toxic than the recently banned neonicotinoids imidacloprid, thiamethoxam and clothianidin, but much more toxic than other neonicotinoids (acetamiprid, thiacloprid) still in use in the EU at the time this study was conducted.

摘要

肟类杀虫剂唑虫酰胺被认为是拟除虫菊酯的潜在替代品,拟除虫菊酯因对蜜蜂有副作用而最近在欧盟被禁用。与拟除虫菊酯一样,唑虫酰胺作为烟碱型乙酰胆碱受体的竞争性调节剂。在农业环境中,蜜蜂通常会接触到多种农药的混合物,并且已知拟除虫菊酯与杀菌剂具有协同作用。我们研究的目的是评估唑虫酰胺单独使用以及与单一剂量琥珀酸脱氢酶抑制剂(SDHI)杀菌剂氟吡菌酰胺联合使用对三种蜜蜂物种(Apis mellifera、Bombus terrestris 和 Osmia bicornis)的急性口服毒性。由于协同作用可能是剂量依赖性的,因此我们测试了一系列唑虫酰胺剂量。使用三种不同的方法评估协同作用:药物独立性 Bliss 标准、比较 LD 的比率测试和模型偏差比。Osmia bicornis 对唑虫酰胺最敏感,杀虫剂和杀菌剂之间存在显著协同作用。对于大多数情况,这些协同作用很弱,仅在早期评估时间和中等唑虫酰胺剂量下发生。这些效应的潜在生态相关性应在田间和/或笼养研究中得到证实。总体而言,我们的实验室结果表明,唑虫酰胺的毒性略低于最近被禁用的新烟碱类杀虫剂吡虫啉、噻虫嗪和噻虫胺,但比在本研究进行时仍在欧盟使用的其他新烟碱类杀虫剂(乙酰甲胺磷、噻虫啉)毒性更大。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a14/7994444/ed28385d3bdc/41598_2021_86036_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验