Institute for Life Course Health Research, Department of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa; School of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK.
Institute for Life Course Health Research, Department of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.
Lancet HIV. 2024 Jan;11(1):e42-e51. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(23)00265-5.
When caregivers live in remote settings characterised by extreme poverty, poor access to health services, and high rates of HIV/AIDS, their caregiving ability and children's development might be compromised. We aimed to test the effectiveness of a community-based child health and parenting intervention to improve child HIV testing, health, and development in rural Lesotho.
We implemented a matched cluster-randomised, controlled trial in the Mokhotlong district in northeastern Lesotho with 34 community clusters randomly assigned to intervention or wait-list control groups within a pair. Eligible clusters were villages with non-governmental organisation partner presence and an active preschool. Participants were caregiver-child dyads, where the child was 12-60 months old at baseline. The intervention consisted of eight group sessions delivered at informal preschools to all children in each village. Mobile health events were hosted for all intervention (n=17) and control (n=17) clusters, offering HIV testing and other health services to all community members. Primary outcomes were caregiver-reported child HIV testing, child language development, and child attention. Assessments were done at baseline, immediately post-intervention (3 months post-baseline), and 12 months post-intervention. We assessed child language by means of one caregiver-report measure (MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventory [CDI]) and used two observational assessments of receptive language (the Mullen Scales of Early Learning receptive language subscale, and the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test 4th edn). Child attention was assessed by means of the Early Childhood Vigilance Task. Assessors were masked to group assignment. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial was registered with ISRCTN.com, ISRCTN16654287 and is completed.
Between Aug 8, 2015, and Dec 10, 2017, 1040 children (531 intervention; 509 control) and their caregivers were enrolled in 34 clusters (17 intervention; 17 control). Compared with controls, the intervention group reported significantly higher child HIV testing at the 12-month follow-up (relative risk [RR] 1·46, 95% CI 1·29 to 1·65, p<0·0001), but not immediately post-intervention. The intervention group showed significantly higher child receptive language on the caregiver report (CDI) at immediate (effect size 3·79, 95% CI 0·78 to 6·79, p=0·028) but not at 12-month follow-up (effect size 2·96, 95% CI -0·10 to 5·98, p=0·056). There were no significant group differences for the direct assessments of receptive language. Child expressive language and child attention did not differ significantly between groups.
Integrated child health and parenting interventions, delivered by trained and supervised lay health workers, can improve both child HIV testing and child development.
United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR).
当照顾者生活在以极端贫困、获取卫生服务机会有限和艾滋病毒/艾滋病发病率高为特征的偏远地区时,他们的照顾能力和儿童的发育可能会受到影响。我们旨在检验一种基于社区的儿童健康和养育干预措施,以改善莱索托农村地区儿童的艾滋病毒检测、健康和发育状况。
我们在莱索托东北部的莫霍特隆区实施了一项匹配的整群随机对照试验,34 个社区整群被随机分配到干预组或等待名单对照组。符合条件的整群是在非政府组织合作伙伴存在和有活跃学前教育的村庄。参与者是照顾者-儿童对,其中儿童在基线时为 12-60 个月。干预包括在每个村庄的非正式学前班为所有儿童提供八次小组课程。为所有干预(n=17)和对照组(n=17)组举办了移动健康活动,为所有社区成员提供艾滋病毒检测和其他卫生服务。主要结果是照顾者报告的儿童艾滋病毒检测、儿童语言发展和儿童注意力。评估在基线、干预后立即(基线后 3 个月)和干预后 12 个月进行。我们通过一种照顾者报告的测量方法(麦克阿瑟-贝茨交际发展量表[CDI])评估儿童的语言,并使用两种接受性语言的观察性评估方法(穆伦早期学习量表接受性语言分量表和皮博迪图片词汇测验第 4 版)。通过幼儿警觉性任务评估儿童注意力。评估人员对分组分配情况进行了屏蔽。分析采用意向治疗。该试验在 ISRCTN.com、ISRCTN16654287 进行了注册,现已完成。
2015 年 8 月 8 日至 2017 年 12 月 10 日,在 34 个群组中(17 个干预组;17 个对照组)共招募了 1040 名儿童(531 名干预组;509 名对照组)及其照顾者。与对照组相比,干预组在 12 个月随访时报告的儿童艾滋病毒检测率显著更高(相对风险[RR] 1.46,95%CI 1.29 至 1.65,p<0.0001),但在干预后立即检测时并非如此。干预组在接受者报告(CDI)上的儿童接受性语言显示出显著更高的得分,即时(效应量 3.79,95%CI 0.78 至 6.79,p=0.028),但在 12 个月随访时没有(效应量 2.96,95%CI -0.10 至 5.98,p=0.056)。在接受性语言的直接评估中,两组之间没有显著的组间差异。儿童表达性语言和儿童注意力在两组之间没有显著差异。
由经过培训和监督的非专业卫生工作者提供的综合儿童健康和养育干预措施,可以提高儿童艾滋病毒检测和儿童发育水平。
美国国际开发署(USAID)和总统防治艾滋病紧急救援计划(PEPFAR)。