Suppr超能文献

基于格子玻尔兹曼模型的螺杆挤出机混合段高粘度广义牛顿流体流动模拟

Simulation of High-Viscosity Generalized Newtonian Fluid Flows in the Mixing Section of a Screw Extruder Using the Lattice Boltzmann Model.

作者信息

Liu Liguo, Meng Zhuo, Zhang Yujing, Sun Yize

机构信息

College of Mechanical Engineering, Donghua University, Shanghai 201620, China.

出版信息

ACS Omega. 2023 Dec 7;8(50):47991-48018. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.3c06663. eCollection 2023 Dec 19.

Abstract

The mixing quality of polymer melts in the mixing section of a single-screw extruder and an injection molding machine has considerable effects on the properties of the molded products. Therefore, the study of the flow field of polymer melts in the mixing section is of great importance. The lattice Boltzmann method (LBM) exhibits unique advantages in simulating non-Newtonian fluids. Many researchers have used LBM to study the flow of medium- and low-viscosity fluids. In their studies, the Reynolds number of fluid flows is generally moderate. However, polymer melts are typical high-viscosity fluids, and their flow Reynolds number is generally very small. The single-relaxation-time lattice Boltzmann method (SRT-LBM) has been used previously to study the flow field of power law fluids in the mixing section. Herein, the flow field of high-viscosity generalized Newtonian fluids in the mixing section of a single-screw extruder is studied using SRT-LBM, the two-relaxation-time lattice Boltzmann method (TRT-LBM), and the multiple-relaxation-time lattice Boltzmann method (MRT-LBM). Through comparison, TRT-LBM has been found to exhibit obvious advantages regarding stability, calculation accuracy, calculation efficiency, and selection of simulation parameters. The TRT-LBM is more suitable for studying high-viscosity generalized Newtonian fluids than SRT-LBM and MRT-LBM. SRT-LBM has low computational efficiency when simulating high-viscosity generalized Newtonian fluids, and instability is easily caused when the fluid has a yield stress. For MRT-LBM, only by studying the relaxation parameters can its advantages be fully utilized. However, optimizing the accuracy and stability of the MRT-LBM via parameter research and linear stability analysis is difficult. For non-Newtonian fluids, it is difficult to optimize the relaxation parameters to make the MRT-LBM more stable and accurate than the TRT-LBM. It is difficult for the MRT-LBM to realize its potential when simulating high-viscosity generalized Newtonian fluids. In addition, we studied the flow pattern in the cross section of the screw channel and compared it to the results reported in previous studies.

摘要

单螺杆挤出机和注塑机混合段中聚合物熔体的混合质量对成型产品的性能有相当大的影响。因此,研究聚合物熔体在混合段的流场具有重要意义。格子玻尔兹曼方法(LBM)在模拟非牛顿流体方面具有独特优势。许多研究人员使用LBM研究中低粘度流体的流动。在他们的研究中,流体流动的雷诺数一般适中。然而,聚合物熔体是典型的高粘度流体,其流动雷诺数通常非常小。单松弛时间格子玻尔兹曼方法(SRT-LBM)此前已用于研究混合段幂律流体的流场。在此,使用SRT-LBM、双松弛时间格子玻尔兹曼方法(TRT-LBM)和多松弛时间格子玻尔兹曼方法(MRT-LBM)研究单螺杆挤出机混合段中高粘度广义牛顿流体的流场。通过比较发现,TRT-LBM在稳定性、计算精度、计算效率和模拟参数选择方面具有明显优势。与SRT-LBM和MRT-LBM相比,TRT-LBM更适合研究高粘度广义牛顿流体。SRT-LBM在模拟高粘度广义牛顿流体时计算效率低,当流体具有屈服应力时容易引起不稳定性。对于MRT-LBM,只有通过研究松弛参数才能充分发挥其优势。然而,通过参数研究和线性稳定性分析来优化MRT-LBM的精度和稳定性很困难。对于非牛顿流体,很难通过优化松弛参数使MRT-LBM比TRT-LBM更稳定、更精确。MRT-LBM在模拟高粘度广义牛顿流体时难以发挥其潜力。此外,我们研究了螺杆通道横截面中的流动模式,并将其与先前研究报告的结果进行了比较。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f36/10733923/7340f4ffe46d/ao3c06663_0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验