Kaarre Janina, Herman Zachary J, Grassi Alberto, Hamrin Senorski Eric, Musahl Volker, Samuelsson Kristian
Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Sahlgrenska Sports Medicine Center, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Orthop J Sports Med. 2023 Dec 22;11(12):23259671231217725. doi: 10.1177/23259671231217725. eCollection 2023 Dec.
Graft failure after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is a debilitating complication often requiring revision surgery. It is widely agreed upon that functional knee outcomes after revision ACLR (r-ACLR) are inferior compared with those after primary reconstruction. However, data are scarce on outcomes after multiple-revision ACLR (mr-ACLR).
To compare patient-reported knee function in terms of Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) preoperatively and 1-year postoperatively after primary ACLR, r-ACLR, and mr-ACLR and evaluate the pre- to postoperative improvement in KOOS scores for each procedure.
Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.
Patients from the Swedish National Knee Ligament Registry who underwent their index ACLR between 2005 and 2020 with a minimum age of 15 years at the time of surgery were included in this study. All patients had pre- and postoperative KOOS data. The 1-year postoperative KOOS and the pre- to postoperative changes in KOOS were assessed between patients who underwent primary ACLR and those who underwent subsequent r-ACLR and mr-ACLR.
Of 20,542 included patients, 19,769 (96.2%) underwent primary ACLR, 760 (3.7%) underwent r-ACLR, and 13 (0.06%) underwent mr-ACLR. Patients who underwent r-ACLR had significantly smaller pre- to postoperative changes on all KOOS subscales compared with patients undergoing primary ACLR ( < .0001 for all). Furthermore, patients in the mr-ACLR group had significantly smaller changes in the KOOS-Pain subscale compared with patients in the r-ACLR group (-9 ± 23.3 vs 2.5 ± 18; = .024).
The study results indicated that while improvement is seen after primary ACLR, r-ACLR, and mr-ACLR, the greatest improvement in functional outcomes is observed after primary ACLR. Patients who underwent at least 1 r-ACLR, specifically mr-ACLR, had lower postoperative outcome scores, indicating that primary ACLR may provide the best chance for recovery after ACL injury.
前交叉韧带重建术(ACLR)后移植物失败是一种令人衰弱的并发症,通常需要翻修手术。人们普遍认为,翻修前交叉韧带重建术(r - ACLR)后的膝关节功能结局比初次重建术后的要差。然而,关于多次翻修前交叉韧带重建术(mr - ACLR)后的结局数据很少。
比较初次ACLR、r - ACLR和mr - ACLR术前及术后1年患者报告的膝关节功能,采用膝关节损伤和骨关节炎疗效评分(KOOS)进行评估,并评估每种手术方式术前至术后KOOS评分的改善情况。
队列研究;证据等级,3级。
本研究纳入了瑞典国家膝关节韧带注册中心的患者,这些患者在2005年至2020年间接受了初次ACLR,手术时年龄最小为15岁。所有患者均有术前和术后的KOOS数据。在接受初次ACLR的患者与接受后续r - ACLR和mr - ACLR的患者之间,评估术后1年的KOOS以及KOOS术前至术后的变化。
在纳入的20542例患者中,19769例(96.2%)接受了初次ACLR,760例(3.7%)接受了r - ACLR,13例(0.06%)接受了mr - ACLR。与接受初次ACLR的患者相比,接受r - ACLR的患者在所有KOOS子量表上术前至术后的变化明显更小(所有均P < 0.0001)。此外,与r - ACLR组患者相比,mr - ACLR组患者在KOOS - 疼痛子量表上的变化明显更小(-9±23.3 vs 2.5±18;P = 0.024)。
研究结果表明,虽然初次ACLR、r - ACLR和mr - ACLR后均可见改善,但初次ACLR后功能结局的改善最大。至少接受过1次r - ACLR(特别是mr - ACLR)的患者术后结局评分较低,这表明初次ACLR可能为前交叉韧带损伤后提供最佳的恢复机会。