Cristiani Riccardo, Hamrin Senorski Eric, Helito Camilo P, Samuelsson Kristian, Stålman Anders
Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Section of Sports Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Stockholm Sports Trauma Research Center (SSTRC), FIFA Medical Centre of Excellence, Stockholm, Sweden.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2025 Jun;33(6):2044-2051. doi: 10.1002/ksa.12496. Epub 2024 Oct 3.
To evaluate and compare the subjective knee function in patients undergoing revision and bilateral anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) with those undergoing primary ACLR in a large cohort.
Patients without concomitant ligament injuries who underwent primary, revision or bilateral ACLR at the Capio Artro Clinic, Stockholm, Sweden, between 2005 and 2018 were identified. The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) was collected preoperatively and at 1, 2 and 5 years postoperatively from the Swedish National Knee Ligament Registry. Patients who underwent revision and bilateral ACLR were compared with those who underwent primary ACLR (control group) using Student's t test.
A total of 6831 patients (6102 with primary ACLRs, 343 with revision ACLRs and 386 with bilateral ACLRs) were included. Preoperatively, there were significant but nonclinically relevant differences in favour of the revision ACLR group for KOOS Symptoms, Pain, Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and Sport/Rec subscale scores compared with the primary ACLR group. Postoperatively, except for the 1-year Symptoms and ADL subscales, the revision ACLR group reported significantly lower scores on all KOOS subscales than the primary ACLR group, with clinically relevant differences (>8-10 points) for the 1-, 2- and 5-year Sport/Rec and Quality of Life (QOL) subscales. The bilateral ACLR group reported significantly, but not clinically relevant, inferior scores on the 1-year Symptoms and QOL subscales and the 5-year Sport/Rec and QOL subscales compared with the primary ACLR group.
Revision ACLR, but not bilateral ACLR, was associated with clinically relevant inferior subjective knee function compared with primary ACLR. It is important to counsel patients regarding their future subjective knee function after repeated ACLR. Compared to primary ACLR, inferior subjective results should be expected after revision ACLR, but not after bilateral ACLR.
Level III.
在一个大型队列中评估和比较接受翻修和双侧前交叉韧带重建(ACLR)的患者与接受初次ACLR的患者的主观膝关节功能。
确定2005年至2018年期间在瑞典斯德哥尔摩卡皮奥关节诊所接受初次、翻修或双侧ACLR且无合并韧带损伤的患者。术前以及术后1年、2年和5年从瑞典国家膝关节韧带登记处收集膝关节损伤和骨关节炎疗效评分(KOOS)。使用学生t检验将接受翻修和双侧ACLR的患者与接受初次ACLR的患者(对照组)进行比较。
共纳入6831例患者(6102例初次ACLR、343例翻修ACLR和386例双侧ACLR)。术前,与初次ACLR组相比,翻修ACLR组在KOOS症状、疼痛、日常生活活动(ADL)和运动/娱乐子量表评分方面存在显著但无临床意义的差异,有利于翻修ACLR组。术后,除了1年时的症状和ADL子量表外,翻修ACLR组在所有KOOS子量表上的得分均显著低于初次ACLR组,在1年、2年和5年的运动/娱乐和生活质量(QOL)子量表上存在临床意义的差异(>8 - 10分)。与初次ACLR组相比,双侧ACLR组在1年时的症状和QOL子量表以及5年时的运动/娱乐和QOL子量表上的得分显著较低,但无临床意义。
与初次ACLR相比,翻修ACLR而非双侧ACLR与临床意义上较差的主观膝关节功能相关。向患者咨询反复ACLR后其未来的主观膝关节功能很重要。与初次ACLR相比,翻修ACLR后应预期主观结果较差,但双侧ACLR后则不然。
三级。