Suppr超能文献

骨科与创伤外科随访护理数字化及视频会诊:基于医疗服务提供者视角的卫生经济评估研究

Digitization of Follow-Up Care in Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery With Video Consultations: Health Economic Evaluation Study From a Health Provider's Perspective.

作者信息

Muschol Jennifer, Heinrich Martin, Heiss Christian, Hernandez Alher Mauricio, Knapp Gero, Repp Holger, Schneider Henning, Thormann Ulrich, Uhlar Johanna, Unzeitig Kai, Gissel Christian

机构信息

Department of Health Economics, Justus Liebig University, Giessen, Germany.

Department of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Giessen, Giessen, Germany.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2023 Dec 25;25:e46714. doi: 10.2196/46714.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recommendations for health care digitization as issued with the Riyadh Declaration led to an uptake in telemedicine to cope with the COVID-19 pandemic. Evaluations based on clinical data are needed to support stakeholders' decision-making on the long-term implementation of digital health.

OBJECTIVE

This health economic evaluation aims to provide the first German analysis of the suitability of video consultations in the follow-up care of patients in orthopedic and trauma surgery, investigate the financial impact on hospital operations and personnel costs, and provide a basis for decisions on digitizing outpatient care.

METHODS

We conducted a randomized controlled trial that evaluated video consultations versus face-to-face consultations in the follow-up care of patients in orthopedic and trauma surgery at a German university hospital. We recruited 60 patients who had previously been treated conservatively or surgically for various knee or shoulder injuries. A digital health app and a browser-based software were used to conduct video consultations. The suitability of telemedicine was assessed using the Telemedicine Satisfaction Questionnaire and the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire. Economic analyses included average time spent by physician per consultation, associated personnel costs and capacities for additional treatable patients, and the break-even point for video consultation software fees.

RESULTS

After 4 withdrawals in each arm, data from a total of 52 patients (telemedicine group: n=26; control group: n=26) were used for our analyses. In the telemedicine group, 77% (20/26) of all patients agreed that telemedicine provided for their health care needs, and 69% (18/26) found telemedicine an acceptable way to receive health care services. In addition, no significant difference was found in the change of patient utility between groups after 3 months (mean 0.02, SD 0.06 vs mean 0.07, SD 0.17; P=.35). Treatment duration was significantly shorter in the intervention group (mean 8.23, SD 4.45 minutes vs mean 10.92, SD 5.58 minutes; P=.02). The use of telemedicine saved 25% (€2.14 [US $2.35]/€8.67 [US $9.53]) in personnel costs and increased the number of treatable patients by 172 annually, assuming 2 hours of video consultations per week. Sensitivity analysis for scaling up video consultations to 10% of the hospital's outpatient cases resulted in personnel cost savings of €73,056 (US $ 80,275.39) for a senior physician. A total of 23 video consultations per month were required to recoup the software fees of telemedicine through reduced personnel costs (break-even point ranging from 12-38 in the sensitivity analysis).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study supports stakeholders' decision-making on the long-term implementation of digital health by demonstrating that video consultations in the follow-up care of patients in orthopedic and trauma surgery result in cost savings and productivity gains for clinics with no negative impact on patient utility.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00023445; https://drks.de/search/en/trial/DRKS00023445.

摘要

背景

《利雅得宣言》发布的医疗保健数字化建议促使远程医疗的采用,以应对新冠疫情。需要基于临床数据的评估来支持利益相关者对数字健康长期实施的决策。

目的

这项卫生经济评估旨在首次对德国骨科和创伤外科患者随访中视频会诊的适用性进行分析,调查对医院运营和人员成本的财务影响,并为门诊护理数字化决策提供依据。

方法

我们在一家德国大学医院进行了一项随机对照试验,评估骨科和创伤外科患者随访中视频会诊与面对面会诊的效果。我们招募了60名曾因各种膝盖或肩部损伤接受过保守治疗或手术治疗的患者。使用一款数字健康应用程序和基于浏览器的软件进行视频会诊。通过远程医疗满意度问卷和EQ-5D-5L问卷评估远程医疗的适用性。经济分析包括医生每次会诊平均花费的时间、相关人员成本和额外可治疗患者的能力,以及视频会诊软件费用的盈亏平衡点。

结果

每组各有4名患者退出后,我们使用了总共52名患者的数据进行分析(远程医疗组:n = 26;对照组:n = 26)。在远程医疗组中,77%(20/26)的患者同意远程医疗满足了他们的医疗需求,69%(18/26)的患者认为远程医疗是接受医疗服务的可接受方式。此外,3个月后两组患者效用变化无显著差异(平均0.02,标准差0.06 vs平均0.07,标准差0.17;P = 0.35)。干预组的治疗时间明显更短(平均8.23,标准差4.45分钟vs平均10.92,标准差5.58分钟;P = 0.02)。假设每周进行2小时视频会诊,远程医疗的使用节省了25%(2.14欧元[2.35美元]/8.67欧元[9.53美元])的人员成本,每年可治疗患者数量增加172例。将视频会诊扩大到医院门诊病例的10%的敏感性分析表明,一名高级医生可节省人员成本73,056欧元(80,275.39美元)。每月总共需要进行23次视频会诊才能通过降低人员成本收回远程医疗的软件费用(敏感性分析中的盈亏平衡点在12 - 38次之间)。

结论

我们的研究通过证明骨科和创伤外科患者随访中的视频会诊可为诊所节省成本并提高生产力,且对患者效用无负面影响,支持了利益相关者对数字健康长期实施的决策。

试验注册

德国临床试验注册中心DRKS00023445;https://drks.de/search/en/trial/DRKS​00023445

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f8f7/10775022/46dbd765f207/jmir_v25i1e46714_fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验