Suppr超能文献

美国各州 1999-2019 年的酒精和大麻政策关系。

Relationships Between Alcohol and Cannabis Policies in U.S. States, 1999-2019.

机构信息

Canadian Institute for Substance Use Research, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.

Clinical Addiction Research and Education (CARE) Unit, Department of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2024 Mar;85(2):254-260. doi: 10.15288/jsad.23-00035. Epub 2023 Dec 26.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

A crucial question regarding the public health impacts of cannabis legalization is its impact on alcohol consumption and alcohol-related harm. However, little is known about whether these changing cannabis policies are occurring in liberal or in restrictive alcohol policy environments, either of which likely affect public health outcomes. We constructed comprehensive state-level alcohol and cannabis policy indices and explored relationships between them.

METHOD

We assessed relationships between the Alcohol Policy Scale (APS) and the Cannabis Policy Scale (CPS) from 1999 to 2019. The APS and CPS were based on 29 and 17 state-level policies, respectively, and each policy was weighted for its relative efficacy and degree of state-year implementation.

RESULTS

From 1999 to 2019, average state APS scores increased modestly (became more restrictive) by 4.11 points (2019 = 43.23, range: 24.44-66.31) and average CPS scores decreased (became less restrictive) by 15.33 points (2019 = 76.40, range: 29.40-95.74) on a 100-point scale. In 2019, average APS scores were similar among states that prohibited (criminalized) possession of cannabis (42.00), decriminalized possession (41.33), legalized medical cannabis (44.36), and legalized recreational cannabis (43.32). Across states, there was no correlation between the restrictiveness of state-level alcohol and cannabis policies ( = .03, = .37) in unadjusted models, although there was some variation by time, geographic region, and political party, with a weak negative correlation in state fixed-effects models.

CONCLUSIONS

Although cannabis policies liberalized rapidly from 1999 to 2019, alcohol policies stayed relatively stable and did not differ by degree of cannabis policy liberalization. In general, there were weak associations between cannabis and alcohol policies among states; however, there was some temporal, regional, and political variation.

摘要

目的

关于大麻合法化对公共健康影响的一个关键问题是其对酒精消费和与酒精相关的危害的影响。然而,对于这些不断变化的大麻政策是在自由或限制酒精政策环境下发生的,人们知之甚少,这两种环境都可能影响公共健康结果。我们构建了全面的州级酒精和大麻政策指数,并探讨了它们之间的关系。

方法

我们评估了 1999 年至 2019 年期间酒精政策量表(APS)和大麻政策量表(CPS)之间的关系。APS 和 CPS 分别基于 29 项和 17 项州级政策,每项政策的权重与其相对效力和州年实施程度有关。

结果

从 1999 年到 2019 年,平均州 APS 评分略有增加(变得更严格)4.11 分(2019 年=43.23,范围:24.44-66.31),平均 CPS 评分降低(变得不那么严格)15.33 分(2019 年=76.40,范围:29.40-95.74),在 100 分制上。2019 年,在禁止(刑事化)拥有大麻的州(42.00)、将拥有大麻合法化的州(41.33)、将医用大麻合法化的州(44.36)和将娱乐性大麻合法化的州(43.32)中,州级酒精和大麻政策的限制程度相似。在未经调整的模型中,各州酒精和大麻政策的限制程度之间没有相关性(=0.03,=0.37),尽管在时间、地理位置和政党方面存在一些差异,州固定效应模型中存在微弱的负相关。

结论

尽管从 1999 年到 2019 年,大麻政策迅速放宽,但酒精政策相对稳定,且不受大麻政策放宽程度的影响。一般来说,各州之间的大麻和酒精政策之间存在微弱的关联;然而,存在一些时间、区域和政治方面的差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验