• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《大麻政策量表:美国各州的一项新研究和监测工具》。

The Cannabis Policy Scale: A New Research and Surveillance Tool for U.S. States.

机构信息

Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.

Sol Price School of Public Policy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.

出版信息

J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2022 Nov;83(6):829-838. doi: 10.15288/jsad.21-00462.

DOI:10.15288/jsad.21-00462
PMID:36484580
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9756403/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Rapid shifts toward cannabis liberalization in the United States have created immense policy variability that is challenging to measure. We developed composite measures to characterize the restrictiveness of U.S. state cannabis policy environments.

METHOD

Nine panelists, consisting of four research team members and five expert policy consultants, nominated distinct cannabis policies pertaining to cannabis prohibition, medicalization, and legalization for recreational use. For each of the 17 nominated policies, panelists developed implementation ratings and rated each policy's relative efficacy for reducing excessive cannabis use by adults, youth use, and impaired driving. Cannabis Policy Scale scores were then calculated for each state-year for all 50 states from 1999 to 2019 by weighting policies by their efficacy and implementation ratings, and then summing over policies.

RESULTS

Median Cannabis Policy Scale scores remained stable until 2008, when they started declining (representing policy liberalization), with steeper declines after 2012. In 2019, state Cannabis Policy Scale scores targeting excessive use among the general population ranged from 29.6 to 66.7 for recreational cannabis legalization states, and from 72.4 to 93.4 for medical cannabis legalization states. Cannabis Policy Scale scores using youth-specific and driving-specific efficacy ratings showed similar trends.

CONCLUSIONS

The Cannabis Policy Scale reflects trends toward liberalization of cannabis policy in many U.S. states. Even within crude policy phenotypes (e.g., medical cannabis programs), Cannabis Policy Scale scores varied considerably between states and over time. The Cannabis Policy Scale is a new measure that can add nuance to cannabis policy research and help assess cannabis policy-outcome relationships.

摘要

目的

美国对大麻合法化的快速转变带来了巨大的政策变化,难以衡量。我们开发了综合指标来描述美国各州大麻政策环境的限制程度。

方法

由四名研究小组成员和五名专家政策顾问组成的九名小组成员提名了与大麻禁止、医疗和娱乐合法化相关的不同大麻政策。对于提名的 17 项政策中的每一项,小组成员都制定了实施评级,并对每项政策减少成年人过度使用大麻、青少年使用和驾驶障碍的相对效果进行了评级。然后,通过对政策的有效性和实施评级进行加权,并对政策进行求和,计算出 1999 年至 2019 年 50 个州每年的大麻政策量表得分。

结果

大麻政策量表的中位数得分在 2008 年之前保持稳定,之后开始下降(表示政策放宽),2012 年之后下降幅度更大。2019 年,针对普通人群过度使用大麻的州大麻政策量表得分,娱乐用大麻合法化的州从 29.6 到 66.7,医疗用大麻合法化的州从 72.4 到 93.4。使用针对青少年和驾驶特定效果的大麻政策量表评分显示出类似的趋势。

结论

大麻政策量表反映了美国许多州大麻政策自由化的趋势。即使在粗略的政策表型(例如,医疗大麻计划)中,大麻政策量表评分在各州之间和随时间变化也有很大差异。大麻政策量表是一种新的度量标准,可以为大麻政策研究增添细微差别,并有助于评估大麻政策结果关系。

相似文献

1
The Cannabis Policy Scale: A New Research and Surveillance Tool for U.S. States.《大麻政策量表:美国各州的一项新研究和监测工具》。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2022 Nov;83(6):829-838. doi: 10.15288/jsad.21-00462.
2
Rating the comparative efficacy of state-level cannabis policies on recreational cannabis markets in the United States.评估美国州级层面的娱乐用大麻政策对娱乐用大麻市场的相对效果。
Int J Drug Policy. 2022 Aug;106:103744. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2022.103744. Epub 2022 May 25.
3
Relationships Between Alcohol and Cannabis Policies in U.S. States, 1999-2019.美国各州 1999-2019 年的酒精和大麻政策关系。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2024 Mar;85(2):254-260. doi: 10.15288/jsad.23-00035. Epub 2023 Dec 26.
4
Alcohol Policies in U.S. States, 1999-2018.美国各州 1999-2018 年的酒精政策。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2020 Jan;81(1):58-67. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2020.81.58.
5
Cannabis policy liberalization is only associated with increased blunt use if states lack strong tobacco control.如果各州缺乏强有力的烟草控制措施,大麻政策的自由化仅与增加使用雪茄烟有关。
Addict Behav. 2024 Oct;157:108100. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2024.108100. Epub 2024 Jul 5.
6
Assessing the public health impacts of legalizing recreational cannabis use in the USA.评估美国娱乐用大麻合法化对公共健康的影响。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2015 Jun;97(6):607-15. doi: 10.1002/cpt.110. Epub 2015 Apr 17.
7
Six policy lessons relevant to cannabis legalization.与大麻合法化相关的六条政策经验教训。
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2019;45(6):698-706. doi: 10.1080/00952990.2019.1569669. Epub 2019 Mar 14.
8
Are recreational cannabis laws associated with declining medical cannabis program enrollment in the U.S.? An analysis of cardholder enrollment and demographic characteristics from 2013 to 2020.美国休闲大麻法律是否与医疗大麻项目注册人数下降有关?对 2013 年至 2020 年持卡人注册和人口统计特征的分析。
Int J Drug Policy. 2022 Feb;100:103531. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2021.103531. Epub 2021 Nov 21.
9
The costs and benefits of cannabis control policies
.大麻管制政策的成本与效益。
Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2020 Sep;22(3):281-287. doi: 10.31887/DCNS.2020.22.3/whall.
10
Impacts of Changing Marijuana Policies on Alcohol Use in the United States.美国大麻政策变化对酒精使用的影响。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2016 Jan;40(1):33-46. doi: 10.1111/acer.12942. Epub 2015 Dec 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Alcohol and Cannabis Use and Co-Use among Ethnic Groups in California.加利福尼亚州不同种族群体中的酒精和大麻使用及共同使用情况。
J Immigr Minor Health. 2025 Aug 7. doi: 10.1007/s10903-025-01743-5.
2
How do restrictions on opioid prescribing, harm reduction, and treatment coverage policies relate to opioid overdose deaths in the United States in 2013-2020? An application of a new state opioid policy scale.2013 - 2020年期间,美国阿片类药物处方限制、减少伤害及治疗覆盖政策与阿片类药物过量死亡之间有何关联?一项新的州阿片类药物政策量表的应用。
Int J Drug Policy. 2025 Mar;137:104713. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2025.104713. Epub 2025 Jan 22.
3
Efficiency and safety of cannabinoid medical use: an analysis of discussions and observed trends on Instagram.大麻素医疗用途的有效性和安全性:对Instagram上讨论及观察趋势的分析
Front Public Health. 2024 Dec 4;12:1494018. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1494018. eCollection 2024.
4
Cannabis Policies, Cannabis, and Opioids in Suicide and Undetermined Intent Death.大麻政策、大麻与自杀及意图不明死亡中的阿片类药物
Am J Prev Med. 2025 Mar;68(3):475-484. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2024.11.009. Epub 2024 Nov 28.
5
Improving Cannabis Policy Research at a Pivotal Time for Policy Development.在政策制定的关键时期改进大麻政策研究。
Am J Public Health. 2024 Nov;114(S8):S635-S638. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2024.307799.
6
Commentary on Pessar et al.: 'Downscaling' United States state cannabis policy to investigate environmental and social impacts on cannabis use.关于佩萨尔等人的评论:将美国州级大麻政策“缩小规模”以调查对大麻使用的环境和社会影响。
Addiction. 2025 Jan;120(1):171-173. doi: 10.1111/add.16694. Epub 2024 Oct 14.
7
Historical change in associations between perceived risk, disapproval, and use of cannabis among young adults ages 19-30, 2011-2022.19-30 岁年轻人感知风险、反对和使用大麻之间的关联在历史上的变化,2011-2022 年。
Addict Behav. 2025 Jan;160:108185. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2024.108185. Epub 2024 Oct 2.
8
The association between state cannabis policies and cannabis use among adults and youth, United States, 2002-2019.2002 - 2019年美国各州大麻政策与成年人及青少年大麻使用之间的关联
Addiction. 2025 Jan;120(1):164-170. doi: 10.1111/add.16663. Epub 2024 Sep 19.
9
Relationships Between Alcohol and Cannabis Policies in U.S. States, 1999-2019.美国各州 1999-2019 年的酒精和大麻政策关系。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2024 Mar;85(2):254-260. doi: 10.15288/jsad.23-00035. Epub 2023 Dec 26.
10
Changes in Cannabis Use From 2014 to 2019 Among Young Adults in Washington State.2014 至 2019 年期间华盛顿州青年人群中大麻使用情况的变化。
Am J Prev Med. 2024 Feb;66(2):252-259. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2023.09.027. Epub 2023 Oct 2.

本文引用的文献

1
How medical are states' medical cannabis policies?: Proposing a standardized scale.各州的医用大麻政策有多“医学”?:提出一个标准化的评估尺度。
Int J Drug Policy. 2021 Aug;94:103202. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2021.103202. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
2
Alcohol policies, firearm policies, and suicide in the United States: a lagged cross-sectional study.美国的酒精政策、枪支政策与自杀:一项滞后的横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Mar 1;21(1):366. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10216-x.
3
The Tobacco Control Scale as a research tool to measure country-level tobacco control policy implementation.烟草控制量表作为衡量国家层面烟草控制政策实施情况的研究工具。
Tob Induc Dis. 2020 Nov 3;18:91. doi: 10.18332/tid/128318. eCollection 2020.
4
Alcohol Policies and Motor Vehicle Crash Deaths Involving Blood Alcohol Concentrations Below 0.08.含酒精浓度低于 0.08 的涉及机动车事故死亡的酒精政策。
Am J Prev Med. 2020 May;58(5):622-629. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.12.015. Epub 2020 Mar 16.
5
Early evidence of the impact of cannabis legalization on cannabis use, cannabis use disorder, and the use of other substances: Findings from state policy evaluations.大麻合法化对大麻使用、大麻使用障碍和其他物质使用影响的早期证据:州政策评估结果。
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2019;45(6):644-663. doi: 10.1080/00952990.2019.1669626. Epub 2019 Oct 11.
6
Alcohol Policies and Alcohol Involvement in Intimate Partner Homicide in the U.S.美国的酒精政策与亲密伴侣杀人案中的酒精因素
Am J Prev Med. 2019 Aug;57(2):172-179. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.02.027. Epub 2019 Jun 22.
7
Development of the International Alcohol Policy and Injury Index.国际酒精政策与伤害指数的制定。
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2018;42. doi: 10.26633/RPSP.2018.6.
8
Association of State Alcohol Policies With Alcohol-Related Motor Vehicle Crash Fatalities Among US Adults.州酒精政策与美国成年人与酒精相关的机动车碰撞死亡事件的关联。
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Jul 1;178(7):894-901. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.1406.
9
Impact of tobacco control policies on smoking prevalence and quit ratios in 27 European Union countries from 2006 to 2014.2006 年至 2014 年 27 个欧盟国家控烟政策对吸烟率和戒烟率的影响。
Tob Control. 2019 Jan;28(1):101-109. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-054119. Epub 2018 Feb 22.
10
Medical Marijuana and Marijuana Legalization.医用大麻与大麻合法化。
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2017 May 8;13:397-419. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032816-045128.