Public Health Research Centre, Comprehensive Health Research Center, CHRC, NOVA National School of Public Health, NOVA University Lisbon, Lisboa, Portugal
Public Health Research Centre, Comprehensive Health Research Center, CHRC, NOVA National School of Public Health, NOVA University Lisbon, Lisboa, Portugal.
BMJ Open. 2023 Dec 27;13(12):e078118. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078118.
This study aims to map and frame the main factors present in support interventions successfully implemented in health organisations in order to provide timely and adequate response to healthcare workers (HCWs) after patient safety incidents (PSIs).
Scoping review guided by the six-stage approach proposed by Arksey and O'Malley and by PRISMA-ScR.
CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Embase, Epistemonikos, PsycINFO, PubMed, SciELO Citation Index, Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, reference lists of the eligible articles, websites and a consultation group.
Empirical studies (original articles) were prioritised. We used the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool Version 2018 to conduct a quality assessment of the eligible studies.
A total of 9766 records were retrieved (last update in November 2022). We assessed 156 articles for eligibility in the full-text screening. Of these, 29 earticles met the eligibility criteria. The articles were independently screened by two authors. In the case of disagreement, a third author was involved. The collected data were organised according to the Organisational factors, People, Environment, Recommendations from other Audies, Attributes of the support interventions. We used EndNote to import articles from the databases and Rayyan to support the screening of titles and abstracts.
The existence of an organisational culture based on principles of trust and non-judgement, multidisciplinary action, leadership engagement and strong dissemination of the support programmes' were crucial factors for their effective implementation. Training should be provided for peer supporters and leaders to facilitate the response to HCWs' needs. Regular communication among the implementation team, allocation of protected time, funding and continuous monitoring are useful elements to the sustainability of the programmes.
HCWs' well-being depends on an adequate implementation of a complex group of interrelated factors to support them after PSIs.
本研究旨在绘制并构建健康组织中成功实施支持干预措施的主要因素框架,以便在发生患者安全事件(PSIs)后及时为医护人员(HCWs)提供充分的响应。
受 Arksey 和 O'Malley 提出的六阶段方法和 PRISMA-ScR 指南指导的范围综述。
CINAHL、Cochrane 图书馆、Embase、Epistemonikos、PsycINFO、PubMed、SciELO Citation Index、Scopus、Web of Science 核心合集、合格文章的参考文献列表、网站和咨询小组。
优先考虑实证研究(原始文章)。我们使用混合方法评估工具 2018 版对合格研究进行质量评估。
共检索到 9766 条记录(最后更新时间为 2022 年 11 月)。我们在全文筛选中评估了 156 篇文章的资格。其中,29 篇文章符合资格标准。这 29 篇文章由两位作者独立筛选。如果意见不一致,则会涉及第三位作者。收集的数据根据组织因素、人员、环境、其他 Audies 的建议、支持干预措施的属性进行组织。我们使用 EndNote 从数据库中导入文章,使用 Rayyan 支持标题和摘要的筛选。
基于信任和非评判原则、多学科行动、领导参与和大力传播支持计划等原则的组织文化的存在是其有效实施的关键因素。应为同伴支持者和领导者提供培训,以促进对 HCWs 需求的响应。实施团队之间的定期沟通、分配受保护的时间、资金和持续监测是计划可持续性的有用要素。
HCWs 的幸福感取决于充分实施一组复杂的相互关联的因素,以在发生 PSIs 后为他们提供支持。