• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

严重不良事件调查的核心是第二受害者支持。

Second Victim Support at the Core of Severe Adverse Event Investigation.

机构信息

Intensive Care Department, Clínico San Cecilio University Hospital, 18016 Granada, Spain.

Patient Safety Committee, Clínico San Cecilio University Hospital, 18016 Granada, Spain.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 15;19(24):16850. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192416850.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph192416850
PMID:36554728
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9779208/
Abstract

There is limited evidence and a lack of standard operating procedures to address the impact of serious adverse events (SAE) on healthcare workers. We aimed to share two years' experience of a second victim support intervention integrated into the SAE management program conducted in a 500-bed University Hospital in Granada, Spain. The intervention strategy, based on the "forYOU" model, was structured into three levels of support according to the degree of affliction and the emotional needs of the professionals. A semi-structured survey of all workers involved in an SAE was used to identify potential second victims. Between 2020 and 2021, the SAE operating procedure was activated 23 times. All healthcare workers involved in an SAE ( = 135) received second-level support. The majority were physicians (51.2%), followed by nurses (26.7%). Only 58 (43.0%) received first-level emotional support and 47 (34.8%) met "second victim" criteria. Seven workers (14.9%) required third-level support. A progressive increase in the notification rates was observed. Acceptance of the procedure by professionals and managers was high. This novel approach improved the number of workers reached by the trained staff; promoted the visibility of actions taken during SAE management and helped foster patient safety culture in our setting.

摘要

针对严重不良事件 (SAE) 对医护人员的影响,目前仅有有限的证据和缺乏标准操作流程。我们旨在分享在西班牙格拉纳达的一家拥有 500 张床位的大学医院中,实施 SAE 管理项目时纳入的二级受害者支持干预措施的两年经验。该干预策略基于“为您”模型,根据专业人员的痛苦程度和情感需求,分为三个支持级别。采用对所有参与 SAE 的工作人员进行半结构化调查的方法,以确定潜在的二级受害者。在 2020 年至 2021 年间,SAE 操作程序共启动了 23 次。所有参与 SAE 的医护人员(n=135)均接受了二级支持。大多数是医生(51.2%),其次是护士(26.7%)。仅有 58 人(43.0%)接受了一级情感支持,47 人(34.8%)符合“二级受害者”标准。有 7 名工作人员(14.9%)需要三级支持。通知率呈逐步上升趋势。专业人员和管理人员对该程序的接受度很高。这种新方法提高了接受培训的工作人员所覆盖的工作人员数量;提高了 SAE 管理过程中所采取措施的可见性,并有助于在我们的环境中培养患者安全文化。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee29/9779208/0ff1afaf2d0e/ijerph-19-16850-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee29/9779208/0ff1afaf2d0e/ijerph-19-16850-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee29/9779208/0ff1afaf2d0e/ijerph-19-16850-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Second Victim Support at the Core of Severe Adverse Event Investigation.严重不良事件调查的核心是第二受害者支持。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 15;19(24):16850. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192416850.
2
Suffering in silence: a qualitative study of second victims of adverse events.默默承受:对不良事件的第二受害者的定性研究
BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Apr;23(4):325-31. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002035. Epub 2013 Nov 15.
3
Becoming a "second victim" in health care: Pathway of recovery after adverse event.医疗保健领域中的“二次受害者”:不良事件后的康复途径。
Rev Calid Asist. 2016 Jul;31 Suppl 2:11-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cali.2016.05.001. Epub 2016 Jul 1.
4
Personal, situational and organizational aspects that influence the impact of patient safety incidents: A qualitative study.影响患者安全事件影响的个人、情境和组织因素:一项定性研究。
Rev Calid Asist. 2016 Jul;31 Suppl 2:34-46. doi: 10.1016/j.cali.2016.02.003. Epub 2016 Apr 20.
5
Interventions in health organisations to reduce the impact of adverse events in second and third victims.针对卫生组织的干预措施,以减轻不良事件对第二受害者和第三受害者的影响。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Aug 22;15:341. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-0994-x.
6
Implementation of a "second victim" program in a pediatric hospital.在一家儿童医院实施“二次受害者”项目。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2015 Apr 1;72(7):563-7. doi: 10.2146/ajhp140650.
7
Supporting staff who are second victims after adverse healthcare events.在不良医疗事件后成为“二次受害者”的辅助人员。
Nurs Manag (Harrow). 2019 Dec 2;26(6):36-43. doi: 10.7748/nm.2019.e1872. Epub 2019 Nov 22.
8
Patient Safety Culture and the Second Victim Phenomenon: Connecting Culture to Staff Distress in Nurses.患者安全文化与“二次受害者”现象:将文化与护士的职业困扰相联系
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2016 Aug;42(8):377-86. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(16)42053-2.
9
Action after Adverse Events in Healthcare: An Integrative Literature Review.医疗保健中不良事件后的行动:综合文献综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 30;17(13):4717. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17134717.
10
Implementing the RISE second victim support programme at the Johns Hopkins Hospital: a case study.在约翰霍普金斯医院实施RISE第二受害者支持计划:一项案例研究。
BMJ Open. 2016 Sep 30;6(9):e011708. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011708.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of second victim experience and support and psychological empowerment on depressive symptoms among nurses in China -a latent class analysis.中国护士的“二次受害者”经历、支持及心理赋权对抑郁症状的影响——一项潜在类别分析
BMC Psychol. 2025 Aug 20;13(1):951. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-03291-x.
2
Second-victim experience in anesthesia and intensive care settings: Organizational gaps, support preferences, and recommendations for action - a cross-sectional study.麻醉与重症监护环境中的“二次受害者”经历:组织差距、支持偏好及行动建议——一项横断面研究
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Jul 25;104(30):e43375. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000043375.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of'the Buddy Study', a peer support program for second victims in healthcare: a survey in two Danish hospital departments.评估“伙伴研究”,一个医疗保健中第二受害者的同伴支持计划:在丹麦两个医院科室的调查。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Apr 27;22(1):566. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07973-9.
2
Prevalence of Second Victims, Risk Factors, and Support Strategies among German Nurses (SeViD-II Survey).德国护士中第二受害者的流行率、风险因素和支持策略(SeViD-II 调查)。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 10;18(20):10594. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182010594.
3
Promoting the Psychological Well-Being of Healthcare Providers Facing the Burden of Adverse Events: A Systematic Review of Second Victim Support Resources.
Second Victim Syndrome Among Healthcare Professionals: A Systematic Review of Interventions and Outcomes.
医疗保健专业人员中的“二次受害者综合征”:干预措施与结果的系统评价
J Healthc Leadersh. 2025 Jun 3;17:225-239. doi: 10.2147/JHL.S526565. eCollection 2025.
4
Current status and influencing factors of the second victim experience and support of operating room nurses.手术室护士二次受害者经历及支持的现状与影响因素
Front Health Serv. 2025 May 15;5:1527983. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2025.1527983. eCollection 2025.
5
Identifying key competencies for supporting second victims in different contexts: a scoping review.确定在不同情境下支持二次受害者的关键能力:一项范围综述
BMJ Open. 2025 May 14;15(5):e094959. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-094959.
6
Avoiding 'second victims' in healthcare: what support do staff want for coping with patient safety incidents, what do they get and is it effective? A systematic review.避免医疗保健领域的“二次受害者”:员工应对患者安全事件需要哪些支持,他们得到了什么支持,这些支持有效吗?一项系统综述。
BMJ Open. 2025 Feb 10;15(2):e087512. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087512.
7
Assessing safety culture and second victim experience following adverse events among Romanian nurses: a cross-sectional study.评估罗马尼亚护士不良事件后的安全文化和“第二受害者”体验:一项横断面研究。
BMC Nurs. 2025 Jan 28;24(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-02745-2.
8
Key elements for designing effective second victim support interventions: a focus group study in European clinical settings.设计有效的“第二受害者”支持干预措施的关键要素:欧洲临床环境中的焦点小组研究
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 6;15(1):e089923. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089923.
9
Developing Core Indicators for Evaluating Second Victim Programs: An International Consensus Approach.制定评估“二次受害者”项目的核心指标:一种国际共识方法。
Int J Public Health. 2024 Aug 30;69:1607428. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2024.1607428. eCollection 2024.
10
"Learn from Errors": Post-traumatic growth among second victims.“从错误中学习”:第二受害者的创伤后成长。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Aug 28;24(1):2330. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19738-6.
促进面临不良事件负担的医疗保健提供者的心理健康:第二受害者支持资源的系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 11;18(10):5080. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18105080.
4
Prevalence of second victims, risk factors and support strategies among young German physicians in internal medicine (SeViD-I survey).德国年轻内科医生中“二次受害者”的患病率、风险因素及支持策略(SeViD-I调查)
J Occup Med Toxicol. 2021 Mar 29;16(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12995-021-00300-8.
5
Psychological and Psychosomatic Symptoms of Second Victims of Adverse Events: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.不良事件中第二受害者的心理和身心症状:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Patient Saf. 2020 Jun;16(2):e61-e74. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000589.
6
Lessons learned for reducing the negative impact of adverse events on patients, health professionals and healthcare organizations.为减少不良事件对患者、卫生专业人员和医疗保健组织的负面影响而吸取的经验教训。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2017 Aug 1;29(4):450-460. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzx056.
7
Does One Size Fit All? Assessing the Need for Organizational Second Victim Support Programs.一刀切是否可行?评估组织第二受害者支持计划的需求。
J Patient Saf. 2021 Apr 1;17(3):e247-e254. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000321.
8
Implementing the RISE second victim support programme at the Johns Hopkins Hospital: a case study.在约翰霍普金斯医院实施RISE第二受害者支持计划:一项案例研究。
BMJ Open. 2016 Sep 30;6(9):e011708. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011708.
9
Interventions in health organisations to reduce the impact of adverse events in second and third victims.针对卫生组织的干预措施,以减轻不良事件对第二受害者和第三受害者的影响。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Aug 22;15:341. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-0994-x.
10
The aftermath of adverse events in Spanish primary care and hospital health professionals.西班牙初级保健和医院卫生专业人员不良事件的后果。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Apr 9;15:151. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-0790-7.