Guerra-Paiva Sofia, Carrillo Irene, Mira José, Fernandes Joana, Strametz Reinhard, Gil-Hernández Eva, Sousa Paulo
NOVA University of Lisbon, Public Health Research Centre, Lisboa, Portugal.
Comprehensive Health Research Center, CHRC, NOVA University of Lisbon, Lisboa, Portugal.
Int J Public Health. 2024 Aug 30;69:1607428. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2024.1607428. eCollection 2024.
To establish a consensus for evaluating second victims (SV) support interventions to facilitate comparison over time and across different organizations.
A three-phase qualitative study was conducted from June 2023 to March 2024. This consensus approach engaged members of the European Researchers Network Working on Second Victims. A nominal group technique and insights from a scoping review were used to create a questionnaire for Delphi Rounds. Indicators were rated 1-5, aiming for agreement if over 70% of participants rated an indicator as feasible and sensitive with scores above 4, followed by a consensus conference.
From an initial set of 113 indicators, 59 were assessed online, with 35 advancing to the Delphi rounds. Two Delphi rounds were conducted, achieving response rates of over 60% and 80% respectively, resulting in consensus on 11 indicators for evaluating SV support programs. These indicators encompass awareness and activation, outcomes of SV support programs, as well as training offered by the institution.
This study presents a scoreboard for designing and monitoring SV support programs, as well as measuring standardized outcomes in future research.
建立评估第二受害者(SV)支持干预措施的共识,以便于进行长期和跨不同组织的比较。
于2023年6月至2024年3月开展了一项三阶段定性研究。这种共识方法让欧洲第二受害者研究网络的成员参与其中。采用名义小组技术和范围综述的见解来创建用于德尔菲轮次的问卷。指标的评分范围为1至5分,目标是如果超过70%的参与者将某个指标评为可行且敏感,且分数高于4分,则达成共识,随后召开共识会议。
从最初的113个指标中,59个在网上进行了评估,35个进入了德尔菲轮次。进行了两轮德尔菲轮次,回复率分别超过60%和80%,就评估SV支持项目的11个指标达成了共识。这些指标包括意识与启动、SV支持项目的结果以及机构提供的培训。
本研究为设计和监测SV支持项目以及在未来研究中衡量标准化结果提供了一个记分牌。