Department of Health and Social Care, School of Midwifery, AP University of Applied Sciences, Noorderplaats 2, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium; School of Health and Social Care, Edinburgh Napier University, Sighthill Campus, EH11 4BN Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Department of Health and Social Care, School of Midwifery, AP University of Applied Sciences, Noorderplaats 2, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium.
Midwifery. 2024 Mar;130:103912. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2023.103912. Epub 2023 Dec 24.
Positive benchmarking can serve as a catalyst for maternity care improvement.
To retrospectively benchmark Flemish maternity care providers' qualities, based on women's positive care experiences, and to explore which attributes of the different care providers contribute to these experiences.
A sequential, two-phased mixed-methods study benchmarking the qualities of the community midwife, the hospital midwife, and the obstetrician. An online questionnaire was used to collect the data among pregnant and postpartum women, who rated their care experiences with the various care providers using the Net Promoter Score. Non-parametric and post hoc tests established the differences between types of clinicians and between antenatal, intrapartum, and postpartum Net Promoter Score mean scores. Content analysis was used to construct a final pool of keywords representing attributes of care professionals, accumulated from the promoters' free text responses. Ranks were assigned to each keyword based on its frequency.
A total of 2385 Net Promoter Scale scores and 1856 free-text responses of 1587 responders were included. The community midwife received the overall highest NPS scores (p < .001). The promoters (n = 1015) assigned community midwives the highest NPS scores (9.67), followed by obstetricians (9.57) and hospital-based midwives (9.51). The distinct benchmarking attributes of community midwives were availability (p < .001), supportiveness (p = .04) and personalised care (p < .001). Being honest (p < .001), empathic (p < .001) and inexhaustible (p = .04) benchmarked hospital midwives. Calmness (p < .001), a no-nonsense approach (p < .001), being humane (p = .01) and comforting (p = .02) benchmarked obstetricians.
DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: The findings indicate that all care providers are highly valued, but community midwives are ranked the highest. The distinct differences between the care professionals can serve as exemplary performance for professional development and shape the profiles of maternity care professionals.
积极的基准测试可以作为改善产妇护理的催化剂。
根据女性对护理的积极体验,对佛兰芒产妇护理提供者的质量进行回顾性基准测试,并探讨不同护理提供者的哪些属性促成了这些体验。
采用序贯、两阶段混合方法对社区助产士、医院助产士和产科医生的质量进行基准测试。使用在线问卷收集了孕妇和产后妇女的数据,她们使用净推荐值 (NPS) 对各种护理提供者的护理体验进行评分。非参数和事后检验确定了不同类型临床医生之间以及产前、产时和产后 NPS 平均得分之间的差异。内容分析用于从促进者的自由文本回复中构建一个最终的关键字池,代表护理专业人员的属性。根据其频率为每个关键字分配一个等级。
共纳入 2385 份 NPS 量表评分和 1856 份来自 1587 名应答者的自由文本回复。社区助产士获得的总体 NPS 评分最高(p<.001)。促进者(n=1015)给予社区助产士最高的 NPS 评分(9.67),其次是产科医生(9.57)和医院助产士(9.51)。社区助产士的独特基准属性是可用性(p<.001)、支持性(p=.04)和个性化护理(p<.001)。诚实(p<.001)、同理心(p<.001)和不知疲倦(p=.04)是医院助产士的基准属性。冷静(p<.001)、直截了当的方法(p<.001)、人道(p=.01)和安慰(p=.02)是产科医生的基准属性。
讨论/结论:研究结果表明,所有护理提供者都受到高度重视,但社区助产士的排名最高。护理专业人员之间的显著差异可以作为专业发展的典范,并塑造产妇护理专业人员的形象。