Suppr超能文献

比利时新冠疫情期间的分娩护理质量:一项基于世卫组织标准的横断面研究

Quality of care at childbirth during the COVID-19 pandemic in Belgium: a cross-sectional study based on WHO standards.

作者信息

Galle Anna, Berghman Helga, D'Hauwers Silke, Vaerewijck Nele, Valente Emanuelle Pessa, Mariani Ilaria, Bomben Arianna, Delle Vedove Stefano, Lazzerini Marzia

机构信息

International Centre for Reproductive Health, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Gent, Belgium

University Centre for Nursing and Midwifery, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Gent, Belgium.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 27;14(12):e086937. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086937.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To examine quality of maternal and newborn care (QMNC) around childbirth in facilities in Belgium during the COVID-19 pandemic and trends over time.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional observational study.

SETTING

Data of the Improving MAternal Newborn carE in the EURO region study in Belgium.

PARTICIPANTS

Women giving birth in a Belgian facility from 1 March 2020 to 1 May 2023 responded a validated online questionnaire based on 40 WHO standards-based quality measures organised in four domains: provision of care, experience of care, availability of resources and organisational changes related to COVID-19.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Quantile regression analysis was performed to assess predictors of QMNC; trends over time were tested with the Mann-Kendall test.

RESULTS

897 women were included in the analysis, 67% (n=601) with spontaneous vaginal birth, 13.3% (n=119) with instrumental vaginal birth (IVB) and 19.7% (n=177) with caesarean section. We found overall high QMNC scores (median index scores>75) but also specific gaps in all domains of QMNC. On provision of care, 21.0% (n=166) of women who experienced labour reported inadequate pain relief, 64.7% (n=74) of women with an instrumental birth reported fundal pressure and 72.3% (n=86) reported that forceps or vacuum cup was used without their consent. On experience of care, 31.1% (n=279) reported unclear communication, 32.9% (n=295) reported that they were not involved in choices,11.5% (n=104) stated not being treated with dignity and 8.1% (n=73) experienced abuse. Related to resources, almost half of the women reported an inadequate number of healthcare professionals (46.2%, n=414). Multivariable analyses showed significantly lower QMNC scores for women with an IVB (-20.4 in the 50th percentile with p<0.001 and 95% CI (-25.2 to -15.5)). Over time, there was a significant increase in QMNC Score for 'experience of care' and 'key organisational changes due to COVID-19' (trend test p< 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Our study showed several gaps in QMNC in Belgium, underlying causes of these gaps should be explored to design appropriate interventions and policies.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04847336.

摘要

目的

研究新冠疫情期间比利时医疗机构分娩前后的孕产妇和新生儿护理质量(QMNC)及其随时间的变化趋势。

设计

横断面观察性研究。

背景

比利时欧洲地区改善孕产妇和新生儿护理研究的数据。

参与者

2020年3月1日至2023年5月1日在比利时医疗机构分娩的妇女,她们对一份基于世界卫生组织40项基于标准的质量指标的有效在线问卷做出了回应,这些指标分为四个领域:护理提供、护理体验、资源可用性以及与新冠疫情相关的组织变革。

主要和次要结局指标

进行分位数回归分析以评估QMNC的预测因素;使用曼-肯德尔检验来检验随时间的变化趋势。

结果

897名妇女纳入分析,其中67%(n = 601)为自然阴道分娩,13.3%(n = 119)为器械助产阴道分娩(IVB),19.7%(n = 177)为剖宫产。我们发现总体QMNC得分较高(中位数指数得分>75),但在QMNC的所有领域也存在特定差距。在护理提供方面,21.0%(n = 166)经历分娩的妇女报告疼痛缓解不足,64.7%(n = 74)器械助产分娩的妇女报告有宫底按压,72.3%(n = 86)报告产钳或吸杯未经其同意使用。在护理体验方面,31.1%(n = 279)报告沟通不清晰,32.9%(n = 295)报告未参与选择,11.5%(n = 104)表示未得到尊严对待,8.1%(n = 73)经历过虐待。在资源方面,近一半的妇女报告医护人员数量不足(46.2%,n = 414)。多变量分析显示,IVB分娩的妇女QMNC得分显著较低(第50百分位数为-20.4,p<0.001,95%CI为(-25.2至-15.5))。随着时间的推移,“护理体验”和“因新冠疫情导致的关键组织变革”的QMNC得分有显著增加(趋势检验p<0.05)。

结论及意义

我们的研究显示比利时在QMNC方面存在若干差距,应探究这些差距的潜在原因,以设计适当的干预措施和政策。

试验注册号

NCT04847336。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1a1/11683956/10cd1f18bfb4/bmjopen-14-12-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验