Suppr超能文献

中等强度瑞舒伐他汀/依折麦布联合治疗与四倍剂量瑞舒伐他汀单药治疗的比较:一项荟萃分析和系统评价。

Moderate-Intensity Rosuvastatin/Ezetimibe Combination versus Quadruple-Dose Rosuvastatin Monotherapy: A Meta-Analysis and Systemic Review.

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics and Computing, Graduate School of Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.

Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service, Wonju, Korea.

出版信息

Yonsei Med J. 2024 Jan;65(1):19-26. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2023.0285.

Abstract

PURPOSE

There are few studies in the literature on the dosage of statin that equivalently reduces low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) compared to an ezetimibe combination and whether such regimens have differences in safety. We compared the lipid-modifying efficacy and safety of 5 mg rosuvastatin/10 mg ezetimibe to those of 20 mg rosuvastatin.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A literature search was conducted using the PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, Web of Sciences, and SCOPUS databases up to December 2021. Human studies investigating the two aforementioned regimens with a randomized controlled design were selected. Outcome variables included the percentage reduction in LDL-C and other lipid parameters and rates of composite adverse events (AEs), including muscle-related symptoms. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed after heterogeneity testing between studies.

RESULTS

Seven studies were included in this meta-analysis. The percentage LDL-C reduction did not differ between the combination and monotherapy groups [standardized mean difference (SMD) 0.08; 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.09 to 0.26; =0.35]. The risk of composite AEs (odds ratio 0.50; 95% CI 0.15 to 1.72; =0.27) of the combination was not different compared to the monotherapy group. The percentage of total cholesterol reduction was greater in the combination group (SMD 0.22; =0.02), whereas that of triglyceride reduction and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol elevation did not differ between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis showed that 5 mg rosuvastatin/10 mg ezetimibe had largely comparable lipid-modifying efficacy and tolerability as 20 mg rosuvastatin.

摘要

目的

文献中关于他汀类药物剂量的研究很少,与依折麦布联合用药相比,能同等程度降低低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C),并且不清楚这些方案在安全性方面是否存在差异。我们比较了 5 毫克瑞舒伐他汀/10 毫克依折麦布与 20 毫克瑞舒伐他汀的降脂疗效和安全性。

材料和方法

检索了PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane、Web of Sciences 和 SCOPUS 数据库,检索截至 2021 年 12 月,纳入了使用随机对照设计比较上述两种方案的人类研究。主要转归变量包括 LDL-C 及其他血脂参数的降低百分比和复合不良事件(AE)发生率,包括肌肉相关症状。在研究间存在异质性时进行了随机效应荟萃分析。

结果

本荟萃分析纳入了 7 项研究。联合治疗组与单药治疗组的 LDL-C 降低百分比无差异[标准化均数差(SMD)0.08;95%置信区间(CI)-0.09 至 0.26;=0.35]。与单药治疗组相比,联合治疗组复合 AE 的风险(比值比 0.50;95%CI 0.15 至 1.72;=0.27)无差异。联合治疗组总胆固醇降低百分比更大(SMD 0.22;=0.02),而甘油三酯降低和高密度脂蛋白胆固醇升高百分比在两组间无差异。

结论

本荟萃分析显示,5 毫克瑞舒伐他汀/10 毫克依折麦布与 20 毫克瑞舒伐他汀相比,具有相当的调脂疗效和可耐受性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/520c/10774651/4d2a016ea264/ymj-65-19-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验