Suppr超能文献

高强度他汀类药物与低/中强度他汀类药物联合依折麦布在达到 LDL-C 目标的动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病患者中的安全性和有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Safety and Effectiveness of High-Intensity Statins Versus Low/Moderate-Intensity Statins Plus Ezetimibe in Patients With Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease for Reaching LDL-C Goals: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

机构信息

Cardiac Primary Prevention Research Center, Cardiovascular Diseases Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Tehran Heart Center, Cardiovascular Diseases Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Clin Cardiol. 2024 Aug;47(8):e24334. doi: 10.1002/clc.24334.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

It remains controversial whether adding ezetimibe to low/moderate-intensity statins has a more beneficial impact on the treatment efficacy and safety of patients with existing atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) compared to high-intensity statin regimens.

HYPOTHESIS

A combination of low/moderate-intensity statins plus ezetimibe might be more effective and safer than high-intensity statin monotherapy.

METHODS

We searched databases for randomized controlled trials comparing lipid profile alterations, drug-related adverse events, and MACE components between high-intensity statin monotherapy and low/moderate-intensity statin plus ezetimibe combination therapy. Pooled risk ratios (RR), mean differences (MD), and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were estimated using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Our comprehensive search resulted in 32 studies comprising 6162 patients treated with monotherapy against 5880 patients on combination therapy. Combination therapy was more effective in reducing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels compared to monotherapy (MD = -6.6, 95% CI: -10.6 to -2.5); however, no significant differences were observed in other lipid parameters. Furthermore, the combination therapy group experienced a lower risk of myalgia (RR = 0.27, 95% CI: 0.13-0.57) and discontinuation due to adverse events (RR = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.51-0.74). The occurrence of MACE was similar between the two treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Adding ezetimibe to low/moderate-intensity statins resulted in a greater reduction in LDL-C levels, a lower rate of myalgia, and less drug discontinuation compared to high-intensity statin monotherapy in patients with existing cardiovascular disease. However, according to our meta-analysis, the observed reduction in LDL-C levels in the combination group did not correlate with a reduction in MACE compared to the high-intensity statin group.

摘要

背景

与高强度他汀类药物治疗相比,在患有动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)的患者中,添加依折麦布至低/中强度他汀类药物是否对治疗效果和安全性具有更大的益处,目前仍存在争议。

假说

低/中强度他汀类药物联合依折麦布的治疗效果可能优于高强度他汀类药物单药治疗。

方法

我们检索了比较高强度他汀类药物单药治疗与低/中强度他汀类药物联合依折麦布治疗在血脂谱变化、药物相关不良事件和主要心血管不良事件(MACE)成分方面的差异的随机对照试验数据库。使用随机效应模型估算汇总风险比(RR)、均数差(MD)和 95%置信区间(95%CI)。

结果

我们全面检索得到了 32 项研究,共纳入了 6162 例接受单药治疗的患者和 5880 例接受联合治疗的患者。与单药治疗相比,联合治疗在降低低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)水平方面更有效(MD=-6.6,95%CI:-10.6 至-2.5);但在其他血脂参数方面无显著差异。此外,联合治疗组肌痛(RR=0.27,95%CI:0.13-0.57)和因不良事件停药(RR=0.61,95%CI:0.51-0.74)的风险更低。两组的 MACE 发生率相似。

结论

在患有 ASCVD 的患者中,与高强度他汀类药物单药治疗相比,添加依折麦布至低/中强度他汀类药物可显著降低 LDL-C 水平,减少肌痛发生率和药物停药率。然而,根据我们的荟萃分析,与高强度他汀类药物组相比,联合治疗组 LDL-C 水平的降低与 MACE 的降低并无相关性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98b1/11319735/fe26b8050ad8/CLC-47-e24334-g004.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验