• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

识别和预测针对医疗从业者的投诉和不当行为的风险:范围综述。

Risk identification and prediction of complaints and misconduct against health practitioners: a scoping review.

机构信息

School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Level 3, Building 503, 85 Park Road, Grafton, Auckland 1023, New Zealand.

出版信息

Int J Qual Health Care. 2024 Jan 13;36(1). doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzad114.

DOI:10.1093/intqhc/mzad114
PMID:38155372
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10791111/
Abstract

Identifying the risk and predicting complaints and misconduct against health practitioners are essential for healthcare regulators to implement early interventions and develop long-term prevention strategies to improve professional practice and enhance patient safety. This scoping review aims to map out existing literature on the risk identification and prediction of complaints and misconduct against health practitioners. This scoping review followed Arksey and O'Malley's five-stage methodological framework. A comprehensive literature search was conducted on MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL databases and finished on the same day (6 September 2021). Articles meeting the eligibility criteria were charted and descriptively analysed through a narrative analysis method. The initial search generated 5473 articles. After the identification, screening, and inclusion process, 81 eligible studies were included for data charting. Three key themes were reported: methods used for identifying risk factors and predictors of the complaints and misconduct, synthesis of identified risk factors and predictors in eligible studies, and predictive tools developed for complaints and misconduct against health practitioners. The findings reveal that risk identification and prediction of complaints and misconduct are complex issues influenced by multiple factors, exhibiting non-linear patterns and being context specific. Further efforts are needed to understand the characteristics and interactions of risk factors, develop systematic risk prediction tools, and facilitate the application in the regulatory environment.

摘要

识别医疗从业者投诉和不当行为的风险并对其进行预测,对于医疗保健监管机构实施早期干预和制定长期预防策略以改善专业实践和提高患者安全至关重要。本范围综述旨在绘制现有关于医疗从业者投诉和不当行为风险识别和预测的文献。本范围综述遵循 Arksey 和 O'Malley 的五阶段方法框架。在 MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 CINAHL 数据库上进行了全面的文献检索,并于同一天(2021 年 9 月 6 日)完成。符合入选标准的文章通过叙述性分析方法进行图表制作和描述性分析。最初的搜索产生了 5473 篇文章。经过识别、筛选和纳入过程,有 81 篇符合条件的研究被纳入数据图表制作。报告了三个关键主题:用于识别投诉和不当行为的风险因素和预测因素的方法、在合格研究中综合确定的风险因素和预测因素,以及为医疗从业者投诉和不当行为开发的预测工具。研究结果表明,投诉和不当行为的风险识别和预测是复杂的问题,受到多种因素的影响,表现出非线性模式并且具有特定的背景。需要进一步努力了解风险因素的特征和相互作用,开发系统的风险预测工具,并促进在监管环境中的应用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/416f/10791111/514e8d029e10/mzad114f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/416f/10791111/b70d7d846dbe/mzad114f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/416f/10791111/514e8d029e10/mzad114f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/416f/10791111/b70d7d846dbe/mzad114f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/416f/10791111/514e8d029e10/mzad114f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Risk identification and prediction of complaints and misconduct against health practitioners: a scoping review.识别和预测针对医疗从业者的投诉和不当行为的风险:范围综述。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2024 Jan 13;36(1). doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzad114.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
4
Ethics of Procuring and Using Organs or Tissue from Infants and Newborns for Transplantation, Research, or Commercial Purposes: Protocol for a Bioethics Scoping Review.从婴儿和新生儿获取器官或组织用于移植、研究或商业目的的伦理问题:生物伦理学范围审查方案
Wellcome Open Res. 2024 Dec 5;9:717. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.23235.1. eCollection 2024.
5
Complaints about chiropractors, osteopaths, and physiotherapists: a retrospective cohort study of health, performance, and conduct concerns.对脊椎按摩师、整骨疗法师和物理治疗师的投诉:一项关于健康、表现和行为问题的回顾性队列研究。
Chiropr Man Therap. 2018 Apr 12;26:12. doi: 10.1186/s12998-018-0180-4. eCollection 2018.
6
Enhancing the scoping study methodology: a large, inter-professional team's experience with Arksey and O'Malley's framework.强化范围研究方法学:一个大型跨专业团队对阿斯基和奥马利框架的应用经验。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Mar 23;13:48. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-48.
7
A Scoping Review of Adult Inpatient Satisfaction with Mental Health Services.成人住院患者对心理健康服务满意度的范围综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Dec 9;11(24):3130. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11243130.
8
Athletes' access to, attitudes towards and experiences of help-seeking for mental health: a scoping review protocol.运动员获取心理健康帮助的途径、态度和体验:系统综述研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Apr 6;13(4):e062279. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062279.
9
Factors influencing practitioners' who do not participate in ethically complex, legally available care: scoping review.影响未参与伦理复杂、合法可提供的医疗保健的从业者的因素:范围综述。
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Sep 28;22(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00703-6.
10
Behavioural modification interventions for medically unexplained symptoms in primary care: systematic reviews and economic evaluation.行为修正干预对初级保健中无法用医学解释的症状:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Sep;24(46):1-490. doi: 10.3310/hta24460.

引用本文的文献

1
The Medicolegal Challenges of Facial Plastic Surgery: A Systematic Review.面部整形手术的法医学挑战:一项系统综述
Aesthet Surg J. 2025 Aug 18;45(9):973-984. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjaf082.
2
Beyond medical errors: exploring the interpersonal dynamics in physician-patient relationships linked to medico-legal complaints.超越医疗差错:探索与医疗法律投诉相关的医患关系中的人际动态。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Aug 29;24(1):1003. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11457-3.
3
Characteristics and risk factors of pharmacist misconduct in New Zealand: a retrospective nationwide analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Systematic review of the factors and the key indicators that identify doctors at risk of complaints, malpractice claims or impaired performance.系统综述识别易发生投诉、医疗事故索赔或表现不佳的医生的因素和关键指标。
BMJ Open. 2021 Aug 24;11(8):e050377. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050377.
2
Does greater patient involvement in healthcare decision-making affect malpractice complaints? A large case vignette survey.患者更多地参与医疗决策是否会影响医疗事故投诉?一项大型病例案例调查。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 2;16(7):e0254052. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254052. eCollection 2021.
3
Rates and Characteristics of Medical Malpractice Claims Against Hospitalists.
新西兰药师不当行为的特征和风险因素:一项回顾性全国性分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Feb 20;24(1):223. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10591-2.
医院医师医疗事故索赔的发生率和特征。
J Hosp Med. 2021 Jul;16(7):390-396. doi: 10.12788/jhm.3557.
4
Unsolicited patient complaints among radiation, medical, and surgical oncologists.放疗、医学和外科肿瘤学家收到的非自愿患者投诉。
Cancer. 2021 Jul 1;127(13):2350-2357. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33513. Epub 2021 Mar 16.
5
Structure and processes of emergency observation units with a geriatric focus: a scoping review.以老年病学为重点的急诊观察单元的结构和流程:范围综述。
BMC Geriatr. 2021 Feb 1;21(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02029-9.
6
Association of Physician Burnout With Suicidal Ideation and Medical Errors.医生职业倦怠与自杀意念和医疗差错的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Dec 1;3(12):e2028780. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.28780.
7
Physician factors associated with increased risk for complaints in primary care emergency services: a case - control study.与初级保健急诊服务中投诉风险增加相关的医师因素:一项病例对照研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Sep 25;21(1):201. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01272-0.
8
Do neurosurgeons receive more patient complaints than other physicians? Describing who is most at risk and how we can improve.神经外科医生比其他医生收到的患者投诉更多吗?描述谁最易面临风险以及我们如何能够改进。
J Neurosurg. 2020 Jul 31;134(6):1990-1997. doi: 10.3171/2020.4.JNS20870. Print 2021 Jun 1.
9
Strategies to measure and improve emergency department performance: a scoping review.衡量和改善急诊科绩效的策略:范围综述。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2020 Jun 15;28(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s13049-020-00749-2.
10
Colorectal Cancer Litigation: 1988-2018.结直肠癌诉讼:1988-2018 年。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2020 Sep;115(9):1525-1531. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000705.