Department of Cardiology Bern University Hospital, Inselspital, University of Bern Switzerland.
Department of Cardiology Itabashi Chuo Medical Center Tokyo Japan.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Jan 2;13(1):e031847. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.031847. Epub 2023 Dec 29.
The optimal time point of staged percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) among patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) remains a matter of debate. Quantitative flow ratio (QFR) is a novel noninvasive method to assess the hemodynamic significance of coronary stenoses. We aimed to investigate whether QFR could refine the timing of staged PCI of non-target vessels (non-TVs) on top of clinical judgment for patients with ACS.
For this cohort study, patients with ACS from Bern University Hospital, Switzerland, scheduled to undergo out-of-hospital non-TV staged PCI were eligible. The primary end point was the composite of non-TV myocardial infarction and urgent unplanned non-TV PCI before planned staged PCI. The association between lowest QFR per patient measured in the non-TV (from index angiogram) and the primary end point was assessed using multivariable adjusted Cox proportional hazards regressions with QFR included as linear or penalized spline (nonlinear) term. QFR was measured in 1093 of 1432 patients with ACS scheduled to undergo non-TV staged PCI. Median time to staged PCI was 28 days. The primary end point occurred in 5% of the patients. In multivariable analysis (1018 patients), there was no independent association between non-TV QFR and the primary end point (hazard ratio, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.69-1.05] per 0.1 increase; =0.125; nonlinear =0.648).
In selected patients with ACS scheduled to undergo staged PCI at a median of 4 weeks after index PCI, QFR did not emerge as an independent predictor of non-TV events before planned staged PCI. Thus, this study does not provide conceptual evidence that QFR is helpful to refine the timing of staged PCI on top of clinical judgment.
URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02241291.
急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者分期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的最佳时间点仍存在争议。定量血流比(QFR)是一种评估冠状动脉狭窄血流动力学意义的新型无创方法。我们旨在研究 QFR 是否可以在临床判断的基础上,改善 ACS 患者非靶血管(非-TV)分期 PCI 的时机。
这项队列研究纳入了瑞士伯尔尼大学医院拟行院外非-TV 分期 PCI 的 ACS 患者。主要终点是非-TV 心肌梗死和计划分期 PCI 前紧急非计划非-TV PCI 的复合终点。使用多变量调整 Cox 比例风险回归模型,以线性或惩罚样条(非线性)项的方式评估每位患者非-TV 测量的最低 QFR(来自索引血管造影)与主要终点之间的关系。共纳入了 1432 例拟行非-TV 分期 PCI 的 ACS 患者,其中 1093 例测量了 QFR。分期 PCI 的中位时间为 28 天。主要终点在 5%的患者中发生。多变量分析(1018 例患者)显示,非-TV QFR 与主要终点之间无独立相关性(风险比,每增加 0.1,为 0.87 [95%CI,0.69-1.05];=0.125;非线性=0.648)。
在索引 PCI 后中位数为 4 周时拟行分期 PCI 的选定 ACS 患者中,QFR 并非计划分期 PCI 前非-TV 事件的独立预测因子。因此,本研究并未提供概念性证据表明 QFR 有助于在临床判断的基础上改善分期 PCI 的时机。